It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: JoshuaCox
I wonder how many accounts will never post again sort of like how many accounts stop posting after the election once people are proven wrong again and again and again and again
Through a series of well-crafted rhetorical questions, Gowdy hinted at the contents of the memo, which he helped write, in his interview with Fox News anchor Chris Wallace on Sunday.
First, Gowdy made it clear the memo isn’t biased. He explained it is the “distilling” of thousands of pages of documents given to House investigators.
“If you think your viewers want to know whether or not the dossier was used in court proceedings, whether or not it was vetted before it was used, whether or not it’s ever been vetted. If you are interested in who paid for the dossier. If you’re interested in Christopher Steele’s relationship with Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee, then, yes, you’ll want the memo to come out,” Gowdy explained.
One of the central questions surrounding the dossier is whether or not it was used — or how heavily it was relied upon — to obtain a FISA court surveillance warrant against Carter Page, a Trump campaign official.
Wallace asked Gowdy about that, but the House Oversight Committee chairman didn’t definitively answer, explaining that if he did, he would be disseminating classified information.
“I will just ask you again, are you interested in whether or not the world’s premier law enforcement agency relied on a work product produced, paid for by the Democratic National Committee?” Gowdy asked.
“Do you want to know whether or not the primary source in these court proceedings had a bias against one candidate? Do you want to know whether or not he said he’d do anything to keep that candidate from becoming elected president?” he added.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: carewemust
I really am glad we have Trey Gowdy in there.
From that, we know what to expect. I want to see the heads roll and the implosions.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: carewemust
That’s easy..
Because Nunes hasn’t actually been privy to the data and is almost certainly just making stuff up for propaganda purposes..
It was Trumps DOJ who put out the statement that Devin hadn’t even seen anything classified..
There is not and never was any evidence...That's what the witch hunt is all about...They are frantically searching for evidence...And they're looking under every rock...
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: JBurns
ANOTHER Memo thread? OMG. Oh well...since there's so much emotion surrounding it, here's my 2 cents related to the DailyWire article you linked to. And also what TREY GOWDY said this morning on Fox News.
If Robert Mueller's investigation is based on REAL EVIDENCE of RUSSIANS attempting to manipulate the outcome of our 2016 election, THAT PART of his 2-pronged investigation will continue. That is what Bob Mueller was appointed to investigate.
If Bob Mueller's CRIMINAL Investigation is based on the fake DOSSIER, or the Illegally obtained FISA spy-warrant, then THAT prong of the investigation must end. (Gowdy said that the MEMO will cause the criminal half of Muellers investigation to be terminated, or severly curtailed in scope.)
That's not Trump's DOJ...It's still Zerobama's Justice Dept...
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: JBurns
Didn’t you see the TRUMP DOJ message where they told Nunes to shut up. That he didn’t even have access to the data he was claiming to have seen???
A trump lap dog came out barking unfounded pro trump nonsense..
Suprise, suprise..
Thomas Paine
@Thomas1774Paine
24m24 minutes ago
FISA memo was just delivered to White House.