It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: eisegesis
Chaos magic can be used for both light and dark endeavors. Memes help see the magic through, for better or worse.
I've stated my position in other threads and most simply don't understand or can't comprehend the next level of controllers that exist... Old constructs must burn and be destroyed for the Phoenix to rise.
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: Boadicea
I will be completely honest. I think Q talks in riddles to pull you in. To get the most eyes and the most involved.
Look at what is taking place in the MSM. Can you believe what they tell you?
So if, say Fox news, published a story about the level of corruption in the FBI would the CNN watchers believe it?
But if they themselves found the proof, it would be harder to deny.
Every good conman knows that you have to give enough truth to gain the mark's trust. Even better if you can set things up in such a way that the mark thinks they figured it out all by themselves, or that they are smarter than the average bear........Lots of ego stroking by the conman helps this along. It also personally involves the mark in the con to the extent that they "own" the con and have an emotional interest in defending and protecting the con.... and the conman.
.
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Boadicea
It may be just as simple as the Trump admin having it's own troll farms... if Donald Trump called on PR people he's known since his days in television to create and man something like this Q phenomenon, as a way to keep his base energized.
It feels a lot more "spooky" than just internet trolls. The direst prediction as to who or what Q is in my opinion, is that they are part of Trumps own private intelligence and military apparatus that he is secretly building outside of the United States government.
I hope that isn't what it is, because the implications are so dark.
originally posted by: IgnorantGod
a reply to: Boadicea
I don't think Q's aimed audience is the mass. I believe Q's purpose is specifically to keep the focus of conspiracy theorists on him. If so, it's probably because the informations they don't want us to know is already out there, waiting to be found. But instead, we are looking at Q and the USA corruption. But where does this corruption really come from?
originally posted by: TheJesuit
Oh and yall jacked my thread BTW Mods same topic s being discussed.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: Boadicea
I will be completely honest. I think Q talks in riddles to pull you in. To get the most eyes and the most involved.
Look at what is taking place in the MSM. Can you believe what they tell you?
So if, say Fox news, published a story about the level of corruption in the FBI would the CNN watchers believe it?
But if they themselves found the proof, it would be harder to deny.
Every good conman knows that you have to give enough truth to gain the mark's trust. Even better if you can set things up in such a way that the mark thinks they figured it out all by themselves, or that they are smarter than the average bear........Lots of ego stroking by the conman helps this along. It also personally involves the mark in the con to the extent that they "own" the con and have an emotional interest in defending and protecting the con.... and the conman.
.
Holy cow does this describe the Q movement to a T.
originally posted by: TheJesuit
LOL GO and read the title of my thread then read the links and youll have a very clear and specific answer.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
a reply to: Boadicea
originally posted by: LightSpeedDriver
One of the best and balanced arguments I have ever seen posted on ATS. You touched on things that I think many members and readers are thinking. I'm in the hope camp, I hope it will be but I too have my reservations. I like being proven wrong though so there is that.
Thank you for the thread.