Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit

originally posted by: Sillyolme
I'm watching this right now.

So wonder what the real reason is???

So wonder what the real reason is???

Wonder no more Silly! I have the answer:

I'm watching this right now.

Hope this helps.

a reply to: Greven

Wanna know what I think is funny ?

Bringing this up considering it happened months ago.

Supposedly that is.

Just in time for Muellers interview.

If people can't see this bullsnip for what it is ?

Quite the shame.

a reply to: whywhynot

PS
So don't read it then. Who's twisting your arm?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: whywhynot

You do realize that they don't have to reveal their sources right?

You also realize that those sources have to actually exist too don't you?
Otherwise you loose readers for being unreliable then you lose advertiser because you lost readers, then you're out of business.

Well Silly it goes to credibility. Of course they don’t have to reveal their sources and they can use anonymous sources if they like. Reporters for the tabloids often do. However, the NYT used to be reliable reading. I admit that I haven’t yet seen articles about Bat Boy in it but give them time because that’s where they are going.

After Stzrok Trump would have been right to fire Mueller.

After losing texts them suddenly finding them again.

Trump would have been RIGHT to fire Mueller.

There's a long list of things .

originally posted by: Greven

I just don't have words for this. Please read the article.

Well read the article...

according to four people told of the matter

This was planted into the "testimonies" for a reason....

STRATEGY.

Trump always 10 steps ahead of the games.

a reply to: Greven

It sounds crazy enough to be made up

a reply to: Grambler

I would agree if not for all the bullsh*t threads making mountains out of molehills if god forbid 2 FBI agents express dislike for Trump... but 3 seperate times where Trump tried to get in the way of an investigation because he didn't feel he had 100% loyalty... that's okay? I want to say something other than GFY, but I'm not sure what.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: whywhynot

PS
So don't read it then. Who's twisting your arm?

Thank you for not twisting my arm.

If you recall I said that I don’t listen to articles that come from unnamed sources so you see you are recommending to me what I already do!

originally posted by: Sillyolme
I'm watching this right now.

So wonder what the real reason is???

It's "Talk" strategy.

Just look at the "reactions"

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: Grambler

I want to say something other than GFY, but I'm not sure what.

It's amazing what kind of emotions from a lack of argument can bring out.

originally posted by: spiritualzombie

originally posted by: Grambler

And in case you missed it, he didnt fire Mueller. He just uestioned if he could be impartial, and was talked out of it.

First he attempted to obstruct Justice by getting Comey alone in a room and suggesting he let go of the Flynn thing. Then he fired Comey... Then he ordered Mueller be fired and the White House council refused the order.

Obstruction of Justice (x3)... Is 3 the official count or were there more attempts?

Your a little confused white house council couldn't stop the president from doing anything. If he wanted to fire him he has every right to do so according to the constitution. Same with Comey removing him as director is within his rights for any reason he sees fit. Most presidents when taking over the white house put in new director's of FBI and CIA.

When he first started everyone thought comey was history in fact Democrats were calling for it because they felt Comey tanked Hillary just before election day.

a reply to: spiritualzombie

Get in the way ?

Trump haters would be hard pressed to PROVE it's been a legal investigation from the start.

originally posted by: neo96
After Stzrok Trump would have been right to fire Mueller.

After losing texts them suddenly finding them again.

Trump would have been RIGHT to fire Mueller.

There's a long list of things .

Unless Trump knows that Mueller is in fact hunting D’s

originally posted by: Greven

McGahn, the lawyer in question, has not denied it.

Strategy Strategy

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: neo96
After Stzrok Trump would have been right to fire Mueller.

After losing texts them suddenly finding them again.

Trump would have been RIGHT to fire Mueller.

There's a long list of things .

Unless Trump knows that Mueller is in fact hunting D’s

I've seen that line of thinking a couple of times.

And I hate to be the bearer of bad news.

But it's just wishful.

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: Grambler

I would agree if not for all the bullsh*t threads making mountains out of molehills if god forbid 2 FBI agents express dislike for Trump... but 3 seperate times where Trump tried to get in the way of an investigation because he didn't feel he had 100% loyalty... that's okay? I want to say something other than GFY, but I'm not sure what.

The beauty is we are all entitled to our opinion.

I find your characterization of the texts to be a gross misrepresentation.

Just today we have texts showing that strzok, who interviewed hillary and her team, saying he wasnt going to go after her loaded for bear because he was worried it would affected him if she became President.

That is far more serious than you are implying, at least in my opinion.

I also dont think trump obstructed by firing mueller, which he is legally allowed to do.

But I have no problem having discussions with people that disagree with me.

a reply to: JinMI

Nah, it's more like when you're faced with a digusting level of hypocrisy. Trump supporters take nothing serious in regards to trump. His campaign is being investigated for collusion... Trump investigated for obstruction... He was apparently surrounded by foreign agents. He fired the guy investigating him and tried the fire the next guy too. And Trump supporters pretend it's all nothing. GFY seems appropriate under the circumstances.

a reply to: JinMI

Nah ...he's still playing make believe. Hes in the bonus round now. It gets trickier to hide stuff on this level.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Greven

Wanna know what I think is funny ?

Bringing this up considering it happened months ago.

Supposedly that is.

Just in time for Muellers interview.

If people can't see this bullsnip for what it is ?

Quite the shame.

Well, this story was allegedly supposed to be dropped on Monday... note this source is a writer for Politico.

There was that whole government shutdown business that pushed it, and then other things after that. Hmm...