-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account- PART 2

a reply to: IAMTAT

They know that already. That's why they chose this new angle to be able to shut the thread down. Because the rules and all. You know. Not because it's not popular in some circles.

"Too bad you can't discuss it. Rules are rules and all". That was the struggle to get the first thread to stay open at the start. They'd just bin them all.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Like this:
Link

1) A clear link to online content about your source material is provided.
2) The "external source" tags are used to differentiate the material as coming from a source not on ATS.

3) DO NOT LINK TO THE CHANS

originally posted by: RadioRobert
They're going to shut down this thread because it references posts elsewhere and on twitter. Like they shut down all the other threads that reference twitter or YouTube or what have you. Wait...

We must need to be saved from ourselves, ... or something...

Screen cap the tweets and you should be fine.

a reply to: OveRcuRrEnteD

So basically, you have to find places where there are attributions to Q without linking directly to Q because the direct source of Q is not allowed here?

OK, then I am fine because I only discuss what someone else posts that Q says that's already in the thread, and when I post source material, I link.

And if I reference something, it's already in one of the two threads and was presumably already linked.

a reply to: OveRcuRrEnteD

Yeah and that suggests we can't post any Q drops anymore because linking to these sites is not allowed. Quite the conundrum.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

You have to find someone else who has already disseminated it.

originally posted by: OveRcuRrEnteD
a reply to: IAMTAT

Like this:
Link

1) A clear link to online content about your source material is provided.
2) The "external source" tags are used to differentiate the material as coming from a source not on ATS.

So...
1.) YES-Twitter or FB source w/link
2.) YES-Personally archived screen shot (?)
3.) NO-chan/Codef*g link.
4.) Redd-it link (?)

a reply to: IAMTAT

I decided to avoid Reddit after the whole T-D debacle. I hate censorship.

Edit: Is this okay?

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: OveRcuRrEnteD
a reply to: IAMTAT

Like this:
Link

1) A clear link to online content about your source material is provided.
2) The "external source" tags are used to differentiate the material as coming from a source not on ATS.

So...
1.) YES-Twitter or FB source w/link
2.) YES-Personally archived screen shot (?)
3.) NO-chan/Codef*g link.
4.) Redd-it link (?)

My understanding is that #3 Codef*g link IS allowed....

MODS please correct me if i'm wrong!

a reply to: nikkib0421

Sherman was being investigated for some lobbying violations in Canada and I think that is the tip of the iceberg. Someone was afraid he was going to say too much.

There is plenty of information linking Apotex to CF/CGI/CHAI.

The fact that the lobbying investigation was dropped after Sherman's MURDER should raise a few red flags.

Investigation Ending

This a deep rabbit hole and I think it has something to do with some HIV testing/research facilities that were set up in Winnipeg and their business of distributing medications to underprivileged areas throughout the world. When I find more information, I will share it.

a reply to: Perfectenemy
Yes, it does seem to be at the moment. Definitely a tricky situation. I think we'll find a way to keep the mods happy and in doing so the thread should improve in quality. There is no need for multiple quotes of the same Q drop. I would like to see more dissemination of older drops in the light of recent news and happenings. "future proves past" type of stuff..

originally posted by: erikthegreen
a reply to: nikkib0421

Sherman was being investigated for some lobbying violations in Canada and I think that is the tip of the iceberg. Someone was afraid he was going to say too much.

There is plenty of information linking Apotex to CF/CGI/CHAI.

The fact that the lobbying investigation was dropped after Sherman's MURDER should raise a few red flags.

Investigation Ending


This a deep rabbit hole and I think it has something to do with some HIV testing/research facilities that were set up in Winnipeg and their business of distributing medications to underprivileged areas throughout the world. When I find more information, I will share it.

Wasn't there a huge scandal way back when about HIV/AIDS meds being tainted or contaminated? Could it have links back to that at all?

originally posted by: OveRcuRrEnteD
a reply to: Perfectenemy
Yes, it does seem to be at the moment. Definitely a tricky situation. I think we'll find a way to keep the mods happy and in doing so the thread should improve in quality. There is no need for multiple quotes of the same Q drop. I would like to see more dissemination of older drops in the light of recent news and happenings. "future proves past" type of stuff..

To avoid multiple NEW Q postings...we should probably designate 1-2 active members here to grab and post them here.

Dashen and Perfectenemy?

a reply to: The GUT

Byrd had an interest and history of dabbling in subjects that fall under the "Occult" heading. He was part of the funding mechanism, too, for the Remote Viewing projects.

He is also a sick pedo on the level of George Herbert Bush according to Cathy O'briens horrifying book Tranceformation of America, same with Hillary and Billy boy.

a reply to: Jusvistn
Since it is not a forum, I don't see why it wouldn't be allowed. It has been linked to in both threads without mod action. It could have just been missed tho..

a reply to: IAMTAT

Even though their host makes them ban Wikileaks ("stolen content") links, they let us post screen caps of the emails etc.

a reply to: IAMTAT
Or just post one if you have a comment. Just posting because it was dropped is redundant.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: dashen

Q would never post here. They chose the chans for a very good reason.

When Q posts something, someone can alert ATS via this thread. We go see what it is and come back to talk about it.

a reply to: Jusvistn

I know there were scandals about cancer chemo meds being given under strength.

www.nytimes.com...

Mr. Courtney is accused of diluting Taxol and Gemzar, used to treat a variety of cancers, including pancreatic and lung cancer, advanced ovarian and breast cancer, and AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. The filing also said Mr. Courtney admitted diluting two other chemotherapy drugs, Paraplatin and Platinol.

So in this case, he did undermine the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma.

What is the actual reason why the chans cannot be linked?