-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account- PART 2

a reply to: carewemust

That’s not how a forum works.

That’s not how freedom of speech that I’m sure you’re all for works either.

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork

I hate how Twitter doesn't use actual timestamps. Which of those 2 messages was first? The one from "Q" @ 9:09am today, or the one from President Trump?

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Skyfloating

Where did I say he was free to go anywhere he wants?

I sad “locked up” in quotes. As in not in jail.

He was locked up in a Hotel. He was interrogated. Blackwater employees assisted in detaining Saudi Royals.

If he was not free to go anywhere he wants, hence he was locked up.

Correct?

a reply to: Skyfloating

So these guys personally met and worked with Rothschilds?

Just because they worked at a Rothschilds bank means nothing.

Where’s the ties that is being implied?

This is just clutching at straws and dropping buzzwords to get the conspiracy nuts all moist.

a reply to: Skyfloating

In a hotel, not a jail.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork

I hate how Twitter doesn't use actual timestamps. Which of those 2 messages was first? The one from "Q" @ 9:09am today, or the one from President Trump?

Really??

Twitter doesn't use time stamps??

Trumps tweet was posted in this thread earlier and it was at 3:50 am and Q ball's was at 12:09.

Nice try though!!!

MTUBY

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Skyfloating

So these guys personally met and worked with Rockerfeller?

Just because they worked at a Rockerfeller bank means nothing.

Where’s the ties that is being implied?

This is just clutching at straws and dropping buzzwords to get the conspiracy nuts all moist.

Nobody mentioned Rockefeller. Get some attention-span man.

And read the thread. Get interested in the actual connections.

a reply to: Skyfloating

I don’t even know what your point of bringing Alwaleed up as for now..

I thought he looked ok, and therefore you were being sarcastic about how he got treated by Blackwater, as in special treatment for a special “guest”.

That would fit the current narrative.

a reply to: Skyfloating

I got the wrong big, scary, catch all evil entity you lot like to carry on about in that post.

Fixed.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Skyfloating

I don’t even know what your point of bringing Alwaleed up as for now..

I thought he looked ok, and therefore you were being sarcastic about how he got treated by Blackwater, as in special treatment for a special “guest”.

That would fit the current narrative.

I see.

Well, I wasnt being sarcastic.

alwaleed is central to this.

he organized obamas Harvard schooling.
groomed him
hand picked memebers of obamas cabinet in 2008
and received YUUGGEEE bailouts to his CITIGROUP holdings under TARP

Q claimed that there are NO, ZERO, ZILCH photos of obama and alwaleed.
strange

Twitter claims Hannitys account was COMPROMISED

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Skyfloating

I don’t even know what your point of bringing Alwaleed up as for now..

I thought he looked ok, and therefore you were being sarcastic about how he got treated by Blackwater, as in special treatment for a special “guest”.

That would fit the current narrative.

Call me crazy but it might be because of his connection with Suhail Rizvi?

Dbl

A letter from the U.S. Senate to John Podesta, dated 25 January 2018, regarding the Steele Dossier.

I find it interesting, maybe ominous that Q seemed to indicate that if MW can't staunch the loss of support by her post SOTU reply to a certain community that those losing control of that community might possibly resort to a False Flag attack of some kind.

That's pretty big deal if things turn out that way.

The message on that subject was clear as day and needed no ciphering skills to understand nor was it ambiguous in any way.

Seems to be a concerted effort afoot to distract from discussion of recent clear messages such as above by a focus on minutiae that doesn't change or affect the overall Q messages nor the resulting individual investigation going on across the web.

In fact distractors are studiously ignoring proofs regards Q bona-fides continously offered by many posters to solely distract from bigger fast moving picture and events requiring interpretation IMHO. ie, prevent that interpretive discussion with concentration on ambiguous minutiae.

ATTENTION!!!!!!

15d.) Cross-Posting: You will not cross-post content from other discussion boards (unless you receive advance written permission from TAN or their agents). You will not post-by-proxy the material of banned members or other individuals who are not members, but have written a response to content within a thread on these forums.

Terms and Conditions of Use--Please Review

ETA
Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
Posting work written by others
This includes images from other sites like twitter.

originally posted by: Phoenix
I find it interesting, maybe ominous that Q seemed to indicate that if MW can't staunch the loss of support by her post SOTU reply to a certain community that those losing control of that community might possibly resort to a False Flag attack of some kind.

That's pretty big deal if things turn out that way.

The message on that subject was clear as day and needed no ciphering skills to understand nor was it ambiguous in any way.

Seems to be a concerted effort afoot to distract from discussion of recent clear messages such as above by a focus on minutiae that doesn't change or affect the overall Q messages nor the resulting individual investigation going on across the web.

In fact distractors are studiously ignoring proofs regards Q bona-fides continously offered by many posters to solely distract from bigger fast moving picture and events requiring interpretation IMHO. ie, prevent that interpretive discussion with concentration on ambiguous minutiae.

I'm confused as to your reasoning.

Would you be kind enough to provide a link to this false flag or to anyone disregarding proveable Q advice that was fore told?


Thank you

MTUBY

Or maybe Jack Dorsey and Al Waleed????

a reply to: Skyfloating

Would it be somewhat factual to say the committee has FusionGPS bank record's and has tracked the financials setting up an OofJ charge here if Podesta's answer is not truthful?

Q - We know all