It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
Could someone please interpret the meaning and context and the ORIGIN of this particular "Q" post for the asshats and naysayers, please and thank you!
originally posted by: FauxMulder
So do these few posters (you know who you are) follow this thread 70 pages / 300 pages in, every post, just to pop in every 20-30 pages to ironically tell us about what a waste of time this is or do they just randolmy search out this thread when they feel threatened and insecure?
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Perfectenemy
You do realise that Republicans back then had what would be called liberal views, right?
It’s pretty common knowledge.
Surprised that Q would make such a mistake (it’s not a mistake, just more trolling of people like you)
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: texasgirl
If the purpose of false flag is to terrorize, a power grid failure is not a false flag. That is up to the level of naked warfare in the open for all to "see."
A power grid failure for any period of time beyond a few days would cause tremendous loss of life and infrastructure.
originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: carewemust
Has there been any other Q post not signed Q like that?
Then we have last night's post and this morning's DJT tweet. Coincidence? I think not.