-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account- PART 2

a reply to: Vasa Croe dead men don't talk.. morbid but true

a reply to: Vasa Croe


Try to avoid unnecessary distractions.. (motive and intent clear)

a reply to: Vasa Croe

So the Russians are covering up the collusion with Clinton.

And Q is saying that the Uranium 1 deal and the Dossier are directly linked.

a reply to: gpols

A fake source can be flipped to testify that it provided fake material thus make them a liability to any person or organization involved like the DNC for instance. Honestly that is a pretty stupid question.

This was in the new post.

Svyatoslav Bondarenk and Sergei Medvedev

originally posted by: gpols
a reply to: Vasa Croe

So the Russians are covering up the collusion with Clinton.

And Q is saying that the Uranium 1 deal and the Dossier are directly linked.

Somebody connected with both.

#718
"13 criminals from 17 countries"
does that imply some have dual citizenship?

Hold on here



Henderson NV
Why is Henderson PD and Nevada DOJ involved in Bangkok hacker case?

files.abovetopsecret.com...

Ok, per the earlier graphic that was posted stating the delta 5,10,15 etc. I pulled the following Anon posts at ~5min intervals from Q post at Feb 11 2018 12:04:42

at 02/11/18 (Sun) 12:09:05 - the Anon talks about needing a full list of any Russians that were involved in the U1 deal.

at 02/11/18 (Sun) 12:14:02 - the Anon talks about hearing "chatter" about 2 plane crashes LAST NIGHT.

at 02/11/18 (Sun) 12:19:13 - the Anon mentions a previous Qrumb about learning to speak russian.

at 02/11/18 (Sun) 12:24:04 - the Anon talks about Sergey Panchenko being very interesting if "he is our guy"

but i also found this post very interesting due to the wording.....
at 02/11/18 (Sun) 12:24:12 the Anon states that "he watched do it all summer of 2017" talking about JS rounding up the agencies.

at 02/11/18 (Sun) 12:29:07 - the Anon talks about Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska & connections to Manafort

at 02/11/18 (Sun) 12:34:00 - the Anon talks about following Q keeps us ahead of the game to understand what comes out in the news, though we aren't seeing the "big names we want. Those will be last."



If we are to take the "Q" from the graphic, could these 5 min interval posts be helping to point us in a direction?

I haven't done the other posts yet. Thought I get your take on this first.

to check my work you can start here

Feb 11 2018 14:47:56
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 5bc869 339123

Think BDT NYC ‘attempt’ & Barlow.
Not stated for verification of credibility.
Why are we still here given foreknowledge of events?
No FBI investigation into this?
Impossible to locate?
Less than 10.
Who are we talking to?
Since Clown takedown of black_ops loc/public exposure
what has changed here?
Expand your thinking.
This is not a game.
RED_OCTOBER.
Q

qcodefag.github.io...

a reply to: Trillium

found this henderson related

Q 719:



What is BDT? I'm drawing a blank. It's probably obvious.

Can't copy/paste...had to type it and i'm slow!

Beat me to it

a reply to: WhatTheory

bulk data transfer

Make it a good one.

a reply to: WhatTheory

I think Q is referring back to the NYC attempted (botched) terror attack with the Bangladeshi national, and BDT is the national currency.

The henderson pd cyber crime case i posted a link to a few posts back. of the 36 named indictments 8 are john doe what on earth is that about? 8 of them are dead? or would that just be unknown?

Sorry, I realise it's not funny or a game. Maybe not the appropriate time for humor, but it's true. Bigger GITMO needed to take bad actors off the board.

If this was Clinton or Mueller related in any way, shape or form, then I would think that's the last straw. There were babies aboard that plane.

Get them! Q and Trump, even with Russia's help. Or maybe it's also a trap to try show cover-up collusion like the satanist poster said earlier if say via a Russia channel, the Trump admin suddenly releases damning U1 info targeted at Mueller so as to end the Russia-collusion investigation.

originally posted by: coldlikecustard
a reply to: WhatTheory

bulk data transfer

Thanks for that.