posted on Feb, 5 2018 @ 02:10 PM
originally posted by: stosh64
Let me get this straight.....
Steele recieved the "unsolicited" information that he based his dossier on from clinton associates????
Clinton pays for opposition research by steele, then has her "associates" feed steele the BS information?
Excuse me, I am currently picking my jaw off the floor. How are these people still walking free??
SMFH
I'm not sure why you are surprised.
It is pretty clear Steele was hired to bring down Trump by the Clinton's anyway possible, the Clinton associates submissions are just suggestions of
things they want added to it to smear him. Don't you remember how horrified Hillary was that Donald wanted to talk to Putin. To her it was a perfect
weakness to exploit, and once Seth Rich broke in and leaked how she rigged the DNC primary, the plan was launched.
They needed some way to smear the DNC emails as being fake by attacking the source. Through brainstorming they arrived at Russia as being a perfect
scapegoat which could also be used to attack Trump for daring to want to talk to this evil empire.
Also remember the Papadopolus conversation suggesting Russian collusion was also reported by an Australian Clinton foundation donor. The whole
Russian nonsense comes from the Clintons.
I love these people a year later saying you can't prove the dossier has fake info in it - Really? If any of it was verifiable about 10,000 media
organizations that most likely have tried to verify it, plus Mueller and the FBI would have done so. The fact nothing has been verified, combined
with its horrifically biased origins suggest almost beyond a shadow of a doubt it is a pack of lies.