-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account- PART 2

a reply to: burntheships

Further evidence that Comey (and Strzok) were torn between pro-Hillary/Anti-Trump feelings AND adhering to their Vow/Oath during 2016.

Since Comey is out of government, he can go full-bore Anti-Trump. He would have done it sooner, but the evidence of how he and his bosses broke laws in protecting Hillary, would have put him..well, exactly where they are now. Facing prosecution.

a reply to: queenofswords

Not trying to push you any which way.

I came across Wittes twitter feed after I spent a fair amount of time
in deep thought and meditation earnestly seeking to know the
truth about what was happening with the Comey, Clinton, Lynch thing.


I was researching how Comey was Reinhold Niebuhr on Twitter at the time,
then one thing led to another, and I found Wittes feed.
I'll never forget the day I found the answers I was looking for.
I was both relieved to know the truth, but sickened by it at the same time.

As I said, the implications are staggering.

Here, a perfecting timed tweet from him,
he posted it first thing this morning.

Two years ago, John Bellinger was (to my knowledge) the first person to identify publicly Donald Trump as a threat to U.S. national security with a short essay that profoundly influenced my thinking on the subject.[?b] Unlike a lot of Republicans, he has continued to speak the truth.

twitter.com...

That is pretty clear that this plot started years ago.

So, yes....I feel strongly about it now.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: burntheships

Further evidence that Comey (and Strzok) were torn between pro-Hillary/Anti-Trump feelings AND adhering to their Vow/Oath during 2016.

BIG factor to consider when attempting to understand Comey's actions.

EVERYONE at the FBI assumed (99% certainty) Hillary would be their next boss.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: burntheships

Further evidence that Comey (and Strzok) were torn between pro-Hillary/Anti-Trump feelings AND adhering to their Vow/Oath during 2016.

My thinking on this has evolved. Where I am now is I think they had to
fix this last thing with Weiner. They couldn't fix it if they ignored it.

They had already sunk themselves so far in the tank for her, they
had to make Weiner and his laptop go away.

a reply to: burntheships

The great fixer indeed.

About that Weiner laptop....the file called INSURANCE. Where have we heard that word used lately. Strzok, Page, McCabe. Wonder if there's a connection.

They didn't have to dig for dirt on them. You just have to get Comey/Mueller/whoever to make one soft loaded decision early: "For the greater good." "It's how the game is played. Think of the big picture." "You know how the press will treat this if we pursue it." After that, they've painted themselves in a corner. It's a political position- an appointment by the President. They know which way the wind blows and how Washington works. You can subtly threaten them with the image of their own integrity being breached by exposing the decision(s) without saying a word. They become unwitting conspirators to protect themselves without having to ask or threaten.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: burntheships

The great fixer indeed.

About that Weiner laptop....the file called INSURANCE. Where have we heard that word used lately. Strzok, Page, McCabe. Wonder if there's a connection.

Was there a file on Weiners laptop named Insurance?

a reply to: burntheships

Indeed there was. But, Comey and his bunch never elaborated on what was in it.

a reply to: queenofswords

Well, great catch. I'll see what I can dig up.

Hope Q know who is reading.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: burntheships

Further evidence that Comey (and Strzok) were torn between pro-Hillary/Anti-Trump feelings AND adhering to their Vow/Oath during 2016.

BIG factor to consider when attempting to understand Comey's actions.
EVERYONE at the FBI assumed (99% certainty) Hillary would be their next boss.

This is very correct, everything needs to be seen through this prism. I'd argue she was intended to be the last "selected" president, so many figured nothing really mattered.

I think it is also helpful to rotate the prism to the side which says, "your education about how government works is/was purposefully misleading, so the conflict you have now is reconciling what is real verses what your brain says it is supposed to be." The outrage people feel is that what they believe is now not real.

40/60. Keep that number in mind as we progress. Q said 40 percent is coming out, if you think "comey" et al, is that 40 percent number you got troubles. The memo/report is not even .5 percent, and on the grand scale doesn't even matter. Comey matters not, he's a stooge, role player, the "grassfire" coming is not for him.

This is exposing the reality. The conflict we have is our programmed mind, by the controllers, conflicting with the exposed reality. Most don't even know the Constitution gives the right of the government to control Commerce only, not humans, but along the way the controllers figured they'd swap humans - cattle, for Commercial vehicles and control them that way. In fact people think we live in a democracy, we do not and never have - Representative Republic is ENTIRELY different. The Electoral College was created to make sure you who vote didn't vote for the wrong guy!

Key point to manage a bit through Feb. This is a Q thread, and why you are here. Q posts are non linear as I have said. What is happening is non linear, meaning there will be no "indictment, pre trial, motions, trial, sentencing, jail" process. The EO's have been put in place to remove their manipulation of the system, through linear time. So think, non linear, big picture, liberation, and so on. You'll find it easier to keep the Q train rolling to the final destination: liberation by the exercise of freewill.

How Harvey Weinstein became one of the most powerful figures in Democratic politics before his career was rocked by a sexual harassment scandal

Also out today is Uma Thurman with her story of how she was raped by
Harvey Weinstein.

These two stories caught my eye, they both confirm that not only was
Hillary part of this Weinstein worship, so was Obama.

“Pulp Fiction” made Weinstein rich and respected, and
Thurman says he introduced her to President Barack Obama at a fund-raiser
as the reason he had his house.

www.nytimes.com...

NYTimes, WaPo, CNN and all others we subconsciously think still "matter" are in DENIAL of Memo info. NYTimes went so far as to claim that Memo CONFIRMS Trumps Russia Collusion. See the psychotic headline "The Memo doesn't vindicate Trump, its more proof of Obstruction".




The Memo reveals only 1% of the Deep State and even that pill is not entirely digested yet.

Let's see what MSM says when actual high level arrests start.

I have started to notice that the Republicans in the House and Senate are saying this shouldn't effect the Muller Investigation while Trump and people in the White house are saying it should.

Is there a feeling in here as to the divide between the two branches?

FTR: The Memo topic has already disappeared from headlines in Europe, Middle East and Asia and moved on to newer issues.

This is how MSM buries big stories: Simply move on to newer stories, as if they were equally important. Aljazeera.com for example, reported on the Memo briefly yesterday (echoing CNN talking points word for word) but has already removed it from front page today.

Reuters: Haiti Orphanages are a Hotspot of Child Trafficking and Pedo-Abuse

James Boasberg ruled to keep the Comey memos secret. Is Boasberg the one that signed of on the FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign? BREAKING: On The Same Day Trump Releases the Nunes Memo A Federal Judge Keeps The Comey Memos Secret

On the same day the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence released the Nunes memo showing the FBI relied on the salacious and unverified Trump dossier to obtain a surveillance warrant on Carter Page, a federal judge ruled to withhold the Comey memos. The memos, authored by former FBI Director James Comey, are about his nine private conversations with President-elect and President Trump.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, who ruled in favor of the FBI’s request to keep the Comey memos secret, also sits on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The FISA court is the same court that approved the surveillance on Trump associates.

Boasberg refused to release the documents on the basis they were still being used by special counsel Robert Mueller in his investigation of the alleged Russian collusion with Trump associates.

For those who are still not sure whether Julian Assange is on board (or even alive) or not:

Every other tweet by JA is about the Memo (of the Millions of things he could be tweeting about). One of his latest tweets proves anti-memo twitter bots.

Wikileaks and JA, while maintaining their non-partisan, slightly left-leaning position as well as some criticism of Trump, are not only on board with Q-info, they are actively promoting it.

This is good news, as Wikileaks has a great track record of accuracy over the last decade.

a reply to: IAMTAT

EVERYONE at the FBI assumed (99% certainty) Hillary would be their next boss.

I think this can be seen in the media reporting from election night as well. How long did they drag out confirming the electoral win for Trump?

What did the faces of the pundits look like when they finally did make an appearance?

What other candidate in American history failed to give a concession speech the night of the election by sending out their campaign manager?

I myself was certain that we were going to end up with the hag in the White House as did many others here I am certain.

Somehow that crisis was averted and I have nothing but gratitude to those whom were responsible. Now it is up to us, the American people, to make the most of this chance we have been given. Take to the digital streets and let your voice be heard in no uncertain terms that we want our country back!

James E. Boasberg is an interesting guy.

On February 7, 2014 Chief Justice John G. Roberts announced that he would appoint Boasberg to the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court for a term starting May 18, 2014 to a seat being vacated by Reggie Walton.[17][18] His term began May 18, 2014.[10]

On August 22, 2016, Boasberg ordered the release of over 14,000 emails found in the United States Department of State correspondence of Hillary Clinton by the FBI during an investigation of Clinton's private server.[19] These emails were requested by Judicial Watch, a conservative legal group, because the FBI has indicated that emails were work-related and not entirely private as Clinton had previously said.[19]

On August 18, 2017, Boasberg dismissed a lawsuit from the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), which had sued the IRS under FOIA seeking for President Donald Trump's personal tax returns from 2010 to the present to be released. Boasberg concluded that because personal tax returns are confidential, they may only be obtained either by permission from Trump himself or if Congress's Joint Committee on Taxation signed off to allow the disclosure.[20]

a reply to: Perfectenemy


#6 implies that the FISA judge was what? Tricked? Complicit? Dumb? Lazy?