The Bible Is All About Jesus Christ Being Exalted.

a reply to: Noinden

no witch has very generalized meaning. It represent all sorts of black arts practiced around the world since the world began, noticed I said world and not earth, you'll have to stew on that one for 20 years before you figure it out.

My how far the drailers have taken this thread and rabbit trialed down hundreds of traisl to words like withc which BTW never was in the original OP.

Let's discuss that OP that is what this thread was for.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Neighbor, you seem to be a bit behind the latest research here. The word witch is substituted by English speakers for spiritual practices, they don't like. However the "witch" of the middle ages. Was the person who either:

(a) Was using Wisecraft (herbalism, basic medicine etc) passed down, from teacher to pupil.
or
(b) Was the fantasy of Church clergy, to justify awful behavior to people they did not like.

You don't seem to understand that in certain cultures "witch" (or the word it is substituted for) was not a bad term while Christianized. Take Ireland for Example. If you know what a Faery Doctor is, and who were members of that group, you would understand this (hint it included Clergy).

However WITCH has specific conotations. It is a gender neutral term (English has no gender, unlike its parent Germainc Languages). Just as a Wizard, Alchemist, etc means something specific (yet different).

You seem to mistake me for a hippy. I'm not a Gaia obsessed member of the Pagan umbrella of religions.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

You are unwilling to discuss the OP when we do it. Much like every other thread you have.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Let's discuss that OP

Why?

You seem to want to talk about anything APART from the OP, so why can’t everyone else?

The op is the center of the subject not the rabbit trails I have ad to go down. Just like the one you are starting now. BTW, without looking, what is the content of the OP of this thread?

a reply to: ChesterJohn

BTW, without looking, what is the content of the OP of this thread?

You pretending to be a christian.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Yet, you've avoided talking to it, if someone is of a different opinion. So you are not really wishing to discuss it.

a reply to: Noinden

I have but it is really you not wanting to admit you may just be wrong.

God's word says only what I have posted in the Original Post, So I am not wrong.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

You can't make that statement. You are selling Gnoses as eídein. We have been through this. You are selling something you (and others) believe (that is feel but can not prove) as soemthing you can see, touch, feel and measure. Eídein via the root *weyd- (to see) is intellectual knowledge.

So no you are not right. You MIGHT be right, but you can not prove it to be so.

Again you are avoiding talking about it, with anyone with a contrary view, which shows you have a fragile ego regarding this.

a reply to: Noinden

Hem, no gnosis, pure AKJV Biblical fact. And I just did.

Nope, selling something means I would have to have an impure motive, and I don't all my motives are pure. Because the mind of Christ in me is pure. The word of God as fond in the AV proves it and that is proof enough, but you don't recognize anything higher truth than yourself. You have already chosen whom you shall bow to very soon.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

No your bible is a doccument of pure belief. It is not a factual doccument. It is a religious text. Thus it is by its very nature, a group of gnoses (plural). To go fiurther and become *weyd-, you are going to have to be able to quantitatively define your Deity. That very act will diminish it, as you can not say "I believe" anymore, and will have to rely on "it can be shown, through facts".

Which brings us back to your "preserved word of God". You have yet to show it is preserved. While there is much evidence that it is not any such thing. Rather a heavily edited doccument, that removed other existing works, which were inconvenient for the powers that be

No who do you think I am going to bow too again? I am in a filial relationship to a couple of the Tuatha de Dannan, most specifically An Morrigan, AN Dagda, and Lug. SO I am going to go ahead and assume you are going to accuse me of following Satan. Do you even understand the history of that being in your faith?

a reply to: Noinden

Oh my frienemy, it will prove it self ten times more true than any science book or history book men have written. and you will witnesses it first hand and still you wont believe. You have already chosen whom you love more than God.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Again you make all these comments, without having the fortitude to say them clearly.

Your proselytizing is amusing neighbor. Just as your myopic monotheism is apparent.

a reply to: Noinden

not once, I never asked anyone to pray or believe. I only asked them what they would do with the facts that were presented and that is not proselytizing.

If you don't like what is posted you can always go read and comment on other Threads, instead of stalking me on my threads.

So far one thing the Bible has been correct about is people like you who oppose his word and historical facts. But I can't expect you to believe that is is true because you have already made up your mind not to believe it is true.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

not once, I never asked anyone to pray or believe.

That’s not true.

You have said to me, noinden and others that we should read your book and pray to find the “real god”.

So how about quit lying?

a reply to: TerryDon79

a suggestion dose not a proselyte make.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Read up on the word proselytise. You do it quite a lot.

Who am I kidding? You won’t look it up. You don’t understand English (amongst other things), so it would be pointless.

BTW, how’s your electrical device working? You said science is wrong, yet here you still are.

a reply to: TerryDon79

No, you might because of your idealism see similarities, but I don't ask anyone to give me any decisions as to anyone's faith, that is the main point in proselytizing is to get the decision.

We are in a forum that the threads allows for one to clear up misunderstanding of God and His Word. In so doing one explains the truth of their religion and leaves it up to the reader to understand.

My suggestions of you and others to read the AV Bible through for a certain amount of time over and over is so you can be truthful of about being familiar with it. Many read it with colored lenses and only about one time, and they may read some certain verses but again highly biased as to the truth and the context of the verses and of the bible as a whole. that is not proselytizing.