It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
I'm confused. I thought Trump was all about law and order and draining the swamp. Why would it be a good thing for a guy like Flynn, who has admitted to breaking the law, to not only get off on a technicality but to also potentially receive a cash pay out as well?
originally posted by: Khaleesi
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
I'm confused. I thought Trump was all about law and order and draining the swamp. Why would it be a good thing for a guy like Flynn, who has admitted to breaking the law, to not only get off on a technicality but to also potentially receive a cash pay out as well?
Unfortunately, IF ( I say if, because we don't know yet ) the evidence was gathered illegally then that evidence can not be used. It will depend on whether some or maybe even all of the evidence gets thrown out. I don't like people getting off on technicalities but, if evidence is collected illegally it can not be used. Our law enforcement agencies should follow the laws. Breaking the law in order to convict someone is a no no.