It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: matafuchs
I think we should stop all immigration for two years. we have to look in our own backyard and not have to worry about our borders.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Theprodicalson
a reply to: DBCowboy
Why should the USA accept the dregs of the world?
The only exception i see is if the USA has actively ruined that country (iraq), other than that the USA should be entitled to only let the best and brightest in.
Rationally, you are correct.
But there is a humanitarian element that we really shouldn't ignore.
Should we?
originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: Theprodicalson
"International talent" aka cheap Indian guys that they can pay a penny on the dollar for.
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: Admitted
Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton famously debate this topic.
It's the only topic they could ever agree upon.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Personally, I'm ambivalent. I can see both sides of the issue. But I may change my mind.
originally posted by: Theprodicalson
originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: Theprodicalson
"International talent" aka cheap Indian guys that they can pay a penny on the dollar for.
No, a surgeon, doctor, scientist or technician who has a very particular skill thats needed.
Working once in pharmaceuticals we regularly had to bring people over for a year or two on contracts to either fix a problem or train us in a new and noval technique.
Most big companies are international with R&D split between say the USA, Ireland, UK and Germany. If one team has a break through, one person needs to come over to other sites.
Then you have renowned surgeons who travel alot, training other surgeons in new techniques ect