Fusion GPS attorney claims "somebody has already been killed" over the dossier

www.foxnews.com...

An attorney for the co-founder of opposition research firm Fusion GPS revealed during a closed-door interview this summer with congressional investigators that “somebody's already been killed” as a result of the publication of the anti-Trump dossier.

The statement was contained in a 312-page transcript of Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson's August interview with committee investigators, released unilaterally Tuesday by Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.

The release itself provoked controversy, with an aide to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, calling it “confounding” for Feinstein to drop the transcript in the “middle of an ongoing investigation.”


Among the many revelations in the document, though, is the claim from Simpson's attorney that someone died because the dossier -- which was commissioned by Fusion GPS -- was publicly released.

An attorney for Fusion GPS, the controversial firm behind the infamous "dossier" has made a cryptic claim. Fox News reports that Josh Levy claims "somebody has already been killed" over the dossier.

The dossier has been widely discredited, and only a select few of the general claims could even be verified. People connected to the dossier and subsequent investigation have also been outed as biased/corrupt, which really brings into question the fact that no substantial evidence has been produced to this date linking Trump to any illegal activity. No evidence has also been produced linking Russia to any alleged hacking or vote tampering. Evidence has been uncovered demonstrating a misinformation campaign by Russia, which is a very common practice among national intelligence services but has not been linked to the President in any way.

Opinion of the dossier varies widely, largely down party lines. There are many who believe it is an entirely fabricated and politically motivated attack by the Clinton campaign, while its supporters claim the information it contains is at least partially truthful and warrants investigation.

What is going on here? Who would kill over the dossier, and what in the world explains Feinstein's inexplicable actions?

Seth Rich!

Who would kill over the dossier, and what in the world explains Feinstein's inexplicable actions?

Controlling their narrative.

Here look people. We're right.

After the fact of a closed door hearing.

didn't a bunch of Russian spies die?

a reply to: neo96

My first thought as well. It's possible Fusion GPS did more for the DNC as we previously thought. What if Seth also found out that the Steele Dossier is bogus and he only did his american patriots duty to expose them regardles if it would have helped Turmp? Now i wonder if there is anything in the bank records that could prove this connection.

a reply to: JBurns

Did the source die before or after Steele interviewed him?

a reply to: neo96

Yup!

Based on further investigation, it appears to be a Democratic ploy exit strategy. Realizing their Mueller efforts will fail to ouster Trump, they've turned to cover their six.

An article posted one hour ago by the Washington Examiner makes Feinstein's unexplainable timing suddenly make sense. They intend to use the "safety" claim in order to avoid naming Steele's sources, thereby further failing to present evidence. If Steele can't/won't name his sources, then the entire document must be discarded as heresay and along with it the allegations against Trump.

In the below quote, you'll see the Examiner's author make a series of logical fallacies, false equivocations and other assumptions that are untrue. This is an effective ploy against the uninitiated, but to an attentive eye their effort is quite transparent. It absolutely betrays the author's bias and opinion, essentially making the Madeline Albright-esque claim that "we are good because we are right, and right because we are good" or some similar logical abomination.

Former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele compiled a dossier on allegations of links between President Trump and Russia. Seeing as Britain is a highly capable intelligence partner of the United States and that Russia is one of our foremost adversaries, it is of the absolute utmost importance that Steele's sources be protected.

Their anger is understandable, but Republicans must stop pushing for more information on the sources behind the so-called Trump dossier.

www.washingtonexaminer.com... 5430

Britain is a complicit Nanny-state, and I have no concern over maintaining the safety of their rogue citizens who want to play spy.

It is clear they intend to use this as a way to bow gracefully out of the anti-Trump Russian hysterics.

BTW, I am unsure if this is the same Josh Levy, but if so, would certainly explain his complicity in the salacious allegations. www.ropesgray.com... Anyone confirm whether this is the attorney in question?

a reply to: JBurns

www.latimes.com...

A good president...

There are many who believe it is an entirely fabricated and politically motivated attack by the Clinton campaign,

It's been a coordinated attack from the White House(Obama/Biden), Clinton campaign/DNC,FBI,DOJ and the media.

And today by Feinstein.

That's unprecedented in this nations history.

It is a political motivated attack.

We know bodies fall around the Clinton like ripen apples.

So...is there an email floating around somewhere talking about 'removing' a problem?

Podesta has been discussed in the past regarding 'wet-work' and it was even discussed to be tied to Scalia.

Man, seems like it is all really unraveling....and what about the McCain connection?

Link

originally posted by: knoxie
didn't a bunch of Russian spies die?

Oleg Erovinkin Is likely the person he is speaking about.

a reply to: neo96

No doubt about it neo

Unprecedented in both its traitorous nature as well as its danger of sparking civil war. I can't imagine the status quo being maintained if a President were to be removed/threatened under such extremely dubious circumstances. To this date, not one shred of evidence has been produced to back their grandiose and frankly obsessive allegations.

I am still waiting for that evidence, and much like we all predicted last year, none of us will ever see a single shred produced.

a reply to: JBurns

If the right pulled the same snip bout Obama and his birth certificate.

Actual hearings, and federal investigations.

They wouldn't stand for it for one second.

a reply to: neo96


Hello Neo,

So today at 12:56 you claimed that you feel sorry for anyone that believes that transcript.

+5 more
posted on Jan, 9 2018 @ 12:56 PM

"The innuendo and misinformation circulating about the transcript are part of a deeply troubling effort to undermine the investigation into potential collusion and obstruction of justice," Feinstein said in a statement


Innuendo and misinformation!

Like her assault weapons ban. That failed.

I feel sorry for anyone that beleives that transcript.

Feinstein has a history of lying.

Why should now be any different.


Then at 2:32 pm you use the transcript to make your point.




Who would kill over the dossier, and what in the world explains Feinstein's inexplicable actions?


Controlling their narrative.

Here look people. We're right.

After the fact of a closed door hearing.
edit on 9-1-2018 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



Sooooooooo....
It only took you an hour and a half to flip flop.😁


Do you feel sorry for yourself???


So, Seth Rich was killed because of the document that was mentioned in testimony that I should disregard, correct?

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: knoxie
didn't a bunch of Russian spies die?

Oleg Erovinkin Is likely the person he is speaking about.

When someone testifies that a person has already died, what is the next logical question?

a reply to: ParkerCramer

So it only took an hour for a little used account to mysteriously pop up.

I wonder who that might be.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: ParkerCramer

So it only took an hour for a little used account to mysteriously pop up.

I wonder who that might be.

So, are you bothered that even a little used account is able to point out the hypocrisy in your posts?

MTUBY

originally posted by: ParkerCramer
a reply to: neo96

So, Seth Rich was killed because of the document that was mentioned in testimony that I should disregard, correct?

Do you think it's possible someone could be killed for trying to expose a document as false?

a reply to: ParkerCramer

Well if you really want to talk bout hypocrisy

Fine.

Begin here.



What bothers me is trolling a thread when someone didn't even participate in the other thread.

originally posted by: JBurns
Based on further investigation, it appears to be a Democratic ploy exit strategy. Realizing their Mueller efforts will fail to ouster Trump, they've turned to cover their six......

It is clear they intend to use this as a way to bow gracefully out of the anti-Trump Russian hysterics.
?

Were def letting no one escape this waste of time and money and apparently life. The internet almost cracked this code already anyway. After all, the reason for the release was to quiet speculation lol I wonder who these persistent speculators were? 🤔🤘🏼 a reply to: JBurns