USS Nimitz UFO could be top secret military drone with anti-gravity technology

a reply to: Arnie123

A wood boat produced electricity?
Color me skeptical

a reply to: ThePeaceMaker

To gauge the publics perception on what it was/might be, if u wanted to do a false flag then your soft disclosure would involve leaks/evidence of otherworldly looking domestic top secret craft hypothetically of course

a reply to: dfnj2015

Anti-grav has been something I have been considering for many years. The discovery of gravity waves made me consider something that could possibly work for propulsion... Not just turning off or finding a way to cancel out gravity, but finding a way to tune into gravitic fields and use that push/pull to one's benefit. In other words...say I'm flying on earth, I could tune my craft to a specific frequency to negate earth's gravity field, but then to leave earth, tune my craft to the moon's gravity field, amplify it and use it to pull me out of earth's atmosphere.

Just a thought I think is worth exploring.

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: dfnj2015

I would say top secret aircraft too.
But what did it do to suggest antigravity?

The only problem I have with the top secret military craft possibility is the fact that aircraft displaying the exact kind of characteristics described by these pilots and by those familiar with the reports investigated by Elizondo et al (hovering, sudden acceleration, high speed acute-angle turns, silent flight), have been report by military pilots for almost 75 years. Did our government really have this technology perfected in the 1940's and has somehow kept it secret this whole time? Is there any precedent for a government keeping a technology secret successfully for three-quarters of a century?

a reply to: dfnj2015




there is nothing out side the realm of know craft in this footage as far as i can tell, and the stories dont match up with whats on the video.

a reply to: BiffWellington

Anti-Gravity is a myth.

The stuff of Science Fiction.

It's my opinion the various encounters with advanced flying objects...including this latest Navy encounter with an apparent advanced technology aerial platform (UFO)>(from a Dark Operation no doubt)

is being brought to the forefront >>> not for Off-Worlder Discosure>>> but Instead to give China/Russia/North Korea/Iran a Pause-to-Consider their ability to withstand a counter-attack from the USAs formidable high-tech/Dark-OPs arsenal of weaponry & delivery systems

~for their threats to support the North Korean dictator If/When he gets a retaliatory strike from the USA for threatning ICBMs loaded with Anthrax or high Altitude H-Bombs designed for aggressive EMP strikes over North America airspace

originally posted by: Scrubdog

Did they not run into these things somewhere out in the middle of the Pacific?

Nope, the sighting occurred approximately 80 nautical miles off the coast of San Diego. With this in mind, it's entirely possible that this was some sort of black ops test flight that that Navy wasn't aware of. I'm personally torn, half of me wants to think this is something "out of this world", while the other half slumps back into the notion that this is "us" testing something highly experimental. Maybe it's a bit of both? Maybe we did recover something from another planet or civilization long ago and this sighting is the result of years of reverse engineering.

a reply to: penroc3

That's a great find! A keen eye on whomever made that video and noticed the zoom level change. What do you think about the other video that shows the "tictac" floating around without a visible flight surface or source of thrust? The way that that thing start to tumble against its direction of momentum is pretty physics defying, and I've yet to see any analysis of what could possibly do that.

Cheers

originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Why would the US Navy release footage of a top secret anti gravity vehicle ?

They didn't. It was released by someone who took the video without permission.

I imagine that someplace Zaph is having a seizure.

And please refer to this chart for identification.

a reply to: alldaylong

You may be right. However, there's tons of evidence the TR-3B is real and it is using some kind of anti-gravity mechanism. Just google, "flying triangle TR-3B".

a reply to: grey580

I thought when I saw this image it was really neat:



You can pic the tic-tac one out from the list. The German bell ones are there too.

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: alldaylong

You may be right. However, there's tons of evidence the TR-3B is real and it is using some kind of anti-gravity mechanism. Just google, "flying triangle TR-3B".

Anti-Gravity would mean changing the Laws Of Physics,

Not possible.

originally posted by: alldaylong

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: alldaylong

You may be right. However, there's tons of evidence the TR-3B is real and it is using some kind of anti-gravity mechanism. Just google, "flying triangle TR-3B".

Anti-Gravity would mean changing the Laws Of Physics,

Not possible.

UHM.....its not anti gravity per se. its just the weak force being reduced on the aircrafts graphene shell and body inside the field. no breaking of laws at all. anf each force has a oppositin physics btw.

a reply to: yuppa


CERN have been experimenting for years on the possibility of anti-gravity. CERN has some of the worlds top Physicists.


Their belief is that to produce anti-gravity you would need to produce anti-matter.

a reply to: yuppa

According to he who shall not be named we have stuff that will float out the hanger already.

And melt ATS twice when it does float out the hanger.

originally posted by: alldaylong

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: alldaylong

You may be right. However, there's tons of evidence the TR-3B is real and it is using some kind of anti-gravity mechanism. Just google, "flying triangle TR-3B".

Anti-Gravity would mean changing the Laws Of Physics,

Not possible.

No it doesn't. It would mean changing the way Humans UNDERSTAND the laws of physics. Honestly we don't even know what gravity is or what causes it. We have only recently discovered gravity waves. But ask any physicist to define the cause of gravity and he'll say it's mass...but it's not that simple.

Please define gravity. And don't say a force, what is gravity?