It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: sevensixtwo
Thats the problem we encounter when bumping up against scientific convention. Just because its widely accepted doesn't mean its the truth.
If you attack Darwin you will be ostracized. But you already know that.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
Darwin's theory is pretty much science fact even though you don't have definitive proof for each evolutionary step. It's not necessary because there's so much collaborating evidence with the theory.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: sevensixtwo
The trick to being a great intellectual is convincing other people you've says something really meaningful and important.
One of my professors used to say, "It's better to say nothing because people will just think you are a fool. But if you say anything, it will prove it."
I will read, the bits I can understand anyway.
originally posted by: sevensixtwo
FOLLOW UP: www.abovetopsecret.com...
I have been working on a research program with astonishing successes for about a decade. I recently completed a book that proves, in my opinion, that there is a conspiracy against me and my result. The result is undeniable, but it is as if the psychologists and sociologists have taken away the keys from the mathematicians in the government who now cannot even get in the door. Why is this result not given attention? It was disallowed from arXiv in 2009 and 2011, and it is as if the URL from which the PDF will be downloaded --- viXra not arXiv --- is more important to the "scientific establishment" that the actual discoveries that are described in the this book which reviews highlights from across 20 previous academic papers, all of high quality, that I uploaded to viXra as regular workunits of my ongoing research. This research is banned. It is a huge conspiracy to deny me any accolades because it will disprove people in the government who think that between they and I, I am the idiot.
The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF MY ABSOLUTE DISPROOF OF DARWINIAN EVOLUTION
The Truth About Evolution
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
I am no expert but I do believe based on the time clock that Darwin's theory is both impractical and nia impossible. Therefore, there must be another explanation that maps to evolution! Some how, some time, something generated a leap in evolution! And the only thing that makes sense is a tweaking of gene's/DNA. Just my opinion.
a reply to: sevensixtwovixra.org...
(TOIC) that spells out all of the trivially derived properties. To that end, consider a cube spanned by ˆ x , ˆ y , and ˆ z . The slices of constant z are the subspaces spanned by ˆ x and ˆ y at each value of z . Every curve that can be constructed using ˆ x and ˆ y will be confined to some slice of z . Any curve leaving the slice would have a component in the ˆ z direction. Likewise any curve constructed from just ˆ x and ˆ y will have its tangent vectors confined to that single slice of constant z . The curve’s cotangent space is the first place we could possibly come across vectors with a non-vanishing ˆ z component. We state these obvious truths because the MCM describes de Sitter (dS) and Anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetimes as slices of a 5D cube and we want to show the exceptional behavior of our flat universe when it sews together two 5D spaces but is not itself a slice of any 5D space.
that there is a conspiracy against me and my result
originally posted by: sevensixtwo
I have been working on a research program with astonishing successes for about a decade. I recently completed a book that proves, in my opinion, that there is a conspiracy against me and my result.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
I agree, but, his criticism that the mechanism making changes is operating too slowly for man to evolve, therefore, proves Darwin's theory of evolution is just wrong and really bad scientific thinking. There could be other mechanisms involved that have yet to be discovered. But declaring proof without any other consideration seems like a bias. Anyone who studies evolution quickly realizes there's a progression of complexity with life forms. Darwin's theory is pretty much science fact even though you don't have definitive proof for each evolutionary step. It's not necessary because there's so much collaborating evidence supporting the theory.