It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Do not deny the classical approach, simply as a reaction, or you will have created another pattern and trapped yourself there.
~ Bruce Lee
originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
If this is true, then how come Hitler?
originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
If this is true, then how come Hitler?
originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
If this is true, then how come Hitler?
I find it interesting that the 2nd vid ended wheb the question about when was the nuclear war was asked! IS there not a part 3?
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
These are the "alien interview" videos I mentioned in case anyone is interested:
That's very deductive of you. Obviously, which means that if one is BS they all are!
originally posted by: darkbake
I have been watching interviews of time travelers on YouTube, have you run across the fact that time travel is invented in the year 2028? I see that in pretty much every interview, although I suspect these people might be watching each other's videos.
Some pending keyboard death that is
originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
My keyboard is dying but I shall try.
I do not believe that is a real being, its movement's are suspect but it is a great argument and what I am going to say it would definitely have no ability to comprehend.
Time is NON linear, the universe is not an endless repetition and while it can indeed be repeated it is most likely that those repeat's will NEVER be identical even if they come close.
There ARE multiple past's not a single history but several which diverge into separate but coexistent and equally factual reality's just as in multiple reality theory all action's can be real in divergent future reality's.
Imagine a bundle of cable's, each cable representing a separate reality and all those cables become a single cable then that single cable separates into another bundle of cable's. that single cable is just one tiny part and that represents what we assume is our reality, the bundle of cables leading into that single cable each represent a former reality that merged to form our current reality and were it diverges is representative of new reality's or parallel reality's diverging from our point which is there common origin point - or one of there origin point's.
This over simplifies it because it is more like an infinite number of reality's or nearly infinite and these are not even other universes just our own.
So travel in time could bring you to a completely alien past that did not exist as far as your linear reality model suggested and then unless you are somehow anchored to your origin point travelling forward to return to your origin could then very easily dump you into one of a near infinite number of alternate future's and not actually your own reality.
Then there is the matter of the universe, the guy's making this whom seem to think they are very clever and indeed they are ascribe to the infinite universe theory but more specifically they seem to ascribe to the repeat universe theory.
For me the universe is far weirder again, the big bang DID occur but like the interrogator says you can't make something out of nothing and I postulate the the universe is actually a membrane type collision in super space that we see manifested like this, think of a white a grey and a black layer, gravity is the black layer and it lied under the grey layer, time and energy come from the white layer and that overlay's the grey layer, were a black hole form's the white and the black layer come into contact.
Our universe exists in that grey layer.
Now imagine that our universe (Well actually more correctly our Time Space Continuum or TSC) not only has black hole's that form within it but that it is actually inside a black hole - or rather it is surrounded by the event horizon of a black whole.
Now how is this possible?.
Look at a piece of mass and then realize it is really just the grey layer scrunched together from our dimensional perspective, the grey layer still overlay's the black layer at a 1:1 ratio and that mean's that because it is scrunched up it also has more gravity equal to it's amount of grey (overlaying the black - gravity layer) in it's volume so mass therefore has gravity but in reality gravity is also present in empty space at a 1:1 ratio but there it is not detectable and of course mass attract's mass as a consequence of this.
Now inside an object, at it's exact center of mass there is a point were that mass and therefore that gravity is actually surrounding that point and must therefore be pulling on it in all directions (from our dimensional perspective), when a star collapses into a black hole therefore it form's not one event horizon but TWO, an external one that borders the grey layer of it's parent TSC and an internal one that surround's that tiny point and there on that tiny point unimaginable forces of gravity are applied to the tinies space, this in turn invert's or rather pull's from the white layer into that space creating a white hole, that white hole spew's energy and time into that point which then form's a new TSC within the black hole.
I would also argue that each parent TSC has relatively slower rate of time than these daughter TSC and indeed that mean's that even if we could step from a young TSC into an older one unless we could also adjust our relative time base it would just look like cold blackness but in reality it is most likely a TSC just like our's with stars and world etc but all moving at a much slower rate of time relative to our perspective.
So it that was an alien it is most likely the mechanic, pilot or tea boy rather than the scientist.
Sadly he would also not be my descendant, then again poor sod is really ugly so at least I am not to blame.
Still single and at 47 myself losing interest in all of that so my gene's are not passed on.
Anyone can predict the Muslim's or the NK loonies are going to press the big red button so that is all the puppet masters are doing as well.
And I see nothing to rule out God in any of that, I actually believe God is a reality.
I don't agree with this constraint because its like saying one cannot travel back beyond ones own birth date! i.e. if you didn't already exist at the time you are traveling to then you cant go there. For me the constraint is an imposed one which may in fact be a red herring! No doubt we will find out in the future if not already in secret!
originally posted by: Specimen
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
It said that one can't travel past the point in time that the time machine made or used, and yet these things have been around for hundreds, if not maybe 1000 of years.
It like Star war, in a galaxy far far away, along time ago yet some how in the distant future.