It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Nearly a year into the Trump presidency, Univision anchor Jorge Ramos says he’s experiencing “the worst moment I’ve had in the 34 years I’ve been living in the United States.”
“With Donald Trump there, I have never been treated so badly. I have never been insulted so much. We’ve never been attacked so much. They have never tried to run us out as much as now,” Ramos vented in an interview with the Spanish radio network Cadena SER.
Ramos, who proclaimed himself “if not an enemy, an opponent” of Trump in the interview, complained about the massive blowback he has received since deciding to use his media platforms to openly oppose the choice of over 62 million American voters in last year’s U.S. presidential election.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: xuenchen
Lol..
The article says “he opposed the choice of 62 million Americans.”
Seeming to forget, that means Ramos is Supporting the choice of the 65 million Americans who voted against Trump..
And I do mean against Trump.. because let’s be real, only 6 people voted FOR hillary.... and Bill Clinton probably wasn’t one of them.. lol
Once you lose the popular vote, ya kinda don’t get to spout the number of people who voted for you like it matters..
The article should say “ electoral votes” or really it could say “states” I guess.. anything but the variable you lost!
But spouting off actual numbers of voters as proof when more people voted against you..
originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: xuenchen
why doesn't he just go back where he came from. problems solved!
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: xuenchen
Lol..
The article says “he opposed the choice of 62 million Americans.”
Seeming to forget, that means Ramos is Supporting the choice of the 65 million Americans who voted against Trump..
And I do mean against Trump.. because let’s be real, only 6 people voted FOR hillary.... and Bill Clinton probably wasn’t one of them.. lol
Once you lose the popular vote, ya kinda don’t get to spout the number of people who voted for you like it matters..
The article should say “ electoral votes” or really it could say “states” I guess.. anything but the variable you lost!
But spouting off actual numbers of voters as proof when more people voted against you..
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xuenchen
I can understand why he said what he did.
Univision itself has revieved many threats and such, not to mention that anti-immigration/Hispanic/Muslim sentiment has been very vocal as of late. Especially on social media sites.
No wonder there has been talk of ATS being labeled a "hate site". We see that bigoted nonsense on this site as well.