It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Don't be ridiculous, thats absurd. Sorry, looks like your dream case is slipping away.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
Looks like anyone who can collaborate what Comey said about the loyalty pledge and trumps asking him to stop the investigation into Mike Flynn are being systematically eliminated.
No, they aren't. Especially involving high profile cases, creates a biased and partisan environment to what is suppose to be an unbiased organization. Stop drinking the koolaid.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: rickymouse
Apparently the the FBI aren't supposed to have opinions. Period.
LOL
This is rich, you saying that WHILE wearing rose colored lens. There is no obstruction of justice case. You can take off those glasses.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler
Well thats true. You realize this is just a ploy to discredit anything and anyone who can testify in the obstruction of justice case right? Anyone who can't see that is viewing the world through orange colored lenses.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: rickymouse
Apparently the the FBI aren't supposed to have opinions. Period.
LOL
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: smurfy
Having a corrupt fbi that is in the bag for one political party is more frightening than anything anyone on trumps team is accused of.
That obviously, can work both ways once the assumption is made, as you have, there is no one wearing halos anyway. However my guess is that any evidence discovered will speak for itself anyway.
As for sources,
Just think back to the publishing of the dossier itself, much of the mainstream knew about it, had been told about it, or had seen pages of it, and said nothing.
Steele himself had told confidante reporters of what he had found, and it was published by the online blog, as coming from Mr X/aka Steele, but most of all, the FBI and the CIA didn't mention it either, but they were already taking the dossier seriously and investigating, never mind that Manafort was already in the picture, it wasn't Muellers concern until he was appointed, then the dossier became his roadmap...not evidence, but the starter for ten, Manafort and Flynn, and most likely some to come, were actually old info...the roadmap is Mueller's entitlement to take things much further, and he's doing that, and there is no good reason for him to stop, and I'm sure he knows that well....so does Trump.
Trump however, went bonkers with tweets...even one where he said Hillary got the dossier to get back at him for her losing the election...totally out of time nonsense, and of course that CNN was fake news...when it was correct about the dossier.
The thing is, you should really be analysing everything, but you stop at the point of anything Trump, which makes no sense....loyalty might be considered a good thing, but still needs to be somewhat rational, (there's no such thing as alternative facts) as for loyalty to Trump, that's something he demands, while loyalty from Trump is non-existent.
As for a corrupt FBI, again where is your perception? Was Snowden a spy, maybe corrupt, and I don't recall anybody making a deal of what political affiliation he had...he was though a leaker, and probably pissed off a lot of people, mostly well heeled spies I should imagine, is anyone arguing fake news there?
Trump though first would have had him hanged, then assassinated...(maybe I got the order wrong) and Hillary, he was putting her in jail...Trump supporters wanted to "hang the bitch" in the end, Trump acquiesced to Comey's findings, so nothing...Nada..but still, he got a lot of people indigestion through rage, and quite a few hurt with his gub alone.
Is it any wonder that his biographer calls Trump a threat to America's democracy, and a shocking threat to the world...
it's not every day you hear that in New York about a sitting President.