New Sphinx in Pakistan?

a reply to: Toolman18

I found a blog post by some guy shilling books about "ancient aliens on mars" and a bunch of other stuff that suggests pareidolia does exist.

I suggest an experiment: go do some washing up and look for faces in the soap bubbles.

originally posted by: jokei
a reply to: Toolman18

I found a blog post by some guy shilling books about "ancient aliens on mars" and a bunch of other stuff that suggests pareidolia does exist.

I suggest an experiment: go do some washing up and look for faces in the soap bubbles.

its much easier then that...

look up at your ceiling... or go to a wooden door and stare at it for a bit...

you will naturally see recognizable figures and faces

When you look at the pictures at face value, it does look like an ancient structure.
If you look closely at the Sphinx and it’s back you notice that it in fact from a 2D perspective
Looks like a point. Rather than a flat and curved back. So most likely is a natural formation.

But at the same time it could just be heavily weathered you notice that there are covers of where it is
Almost like water has settled or even receiving direct winds against the stone causing it to corrode faster.

Interesting find!!!

Toolman needs to settle down, it was merely an interesting topic OP wanted to come to discuss,
As however to your camel... it is actually an ancient stone camel carved, that has also corroded overtime check
Your facts...

a reply to: Revolution9

Maybe G-d waved his little finger and just blasted all natural and "man made" rock formations into existance to misconstrue our understanding of the 7day creation. Or sent the cheeky Nephilim to carve them to confuse us like those pesky dinosaurs? Who knows?

Great post Toolman18 outside of the box and not politics s&f. Looking forward to reading the article when I have time but the picture is certinaly compelling. Looks a lot like a cross cultural temple. Hopefully some further investigation is done.

the newly 'discovered' ancient Spinks... is a Dead End.... just a vain attempt to create a cottage industry that can only exist because the Sphinx is controversial... (like the 'Cydonia" / "Face-on-Mars" ~~ A Classic example of the Scheme in practice)

Problem: how did the Local followers & those on a Foreign Pilgrimage ever ascend the heights of the cliffs to pay homage in the Temple seating at the Sphinx Complex... Magic Carpet Rides ? Vimanas (ancient sky craft) ? I Know there are no visible Steps carved into the rock

as reel as BigFoot- Nibiru- Tooth Fairy, Perpetual Motion Machine, Crypto-Coins, et al.

But, Hey--- there's a sucker-born-every-minute

originally posted by: Revolution9
a reply to: Toolman18

pareidolia

Why did you ignore, just as the linked article ignores, the fact that no archaologist on the planet believes this to be what the article is saying it could be?

You can't say for sure, lol? What are your credentials other than you clicked on some far fetched click bait. Perhaps you are Indiana Jones?

Where are the entrances to your great Pakistan temple of the sphinx in between those imagined great columns?

Do you know what this word means: "pareidolia"? Look it up and you will learn somwething new whiuch you did not learn from the article that totally ignores archaology and makes its own assumptions based on what that word means.

All natural. If nature can make hexagons it can sure make a lump of rock that vaugely resembles a sphinx.

Damn dude, chill out.

a reply to: Toolman18

S&F for your thread sir. These kinds of threads are always interesting.

a reply to: Toolman18
No sir. Its actually PacMan being dragged away while laying on his back by a seahorse. Nice try though

a reply to: Toolman18

There might be something to it.
Some of the photos show unnatural symmetry, and resembles something that could be carved out of the rock.
Most of the temples in that area of the world are carved into or away from an already existing rock formation.

One thing that sort of gives me doubt, is the photos only show it from one angle. I wonder what it looks like from the other side.

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Toolman18

There might be something to it.
Some of the photos show unnatural symmetry, and resembles something that could be carved out of the rock.
Most of the temples in that area of the world are carved into or away from an already existing rock formation.

One thing that sort of gives me doubt, is the photos only show it from one angle. I wonder what it looks like from the other side.

i love when i go through an article and a subsequent thread with one thing prominent in my mind to say about it, and then the final comment nails it. My thoughts exactly, Strong

a reply to: Toolman18

Of course, the article only has long distance photos.


Derrrrrrrrrrr

Lots of eroded rock formations, better then mars.

a reply to: Toolman18

The photo below definately makes this site seem legit but has there been any manipulation of the photo?



Like a poster said on the site 'those formations in the rock are found elsewhere such as at the Grand Canyon'. i noticed that too. If it weren't for the 'pillars' and what looks like a huge wall surrounding the site, I would say this was just rock formation although the 'Sphinx' does look like a Sphinx' sitting atop this Temple.

originally posted by: Toolman18
a reply to: Revolution9

Did you know "pareidolia" isn't actually a thing? It doesn't exist. Really. Look it up.

Just trying to introduce interesting stuff to this site instead of the crappy political jargon.

Stop criticizing and embrace a non-political thread.

Pareidolia is a real word with a real definition, so I have no idea why you're saying it doesn't exist.

The tendency to interpret a vague stimulus as something known to the observer, such as interpreting marks on Mars as canals, seeing shapes in clouds, or hearing hidden messages in music.

It also has nothing to do with politics, so I have no idea what made you think it was "political jargon".
Whether or not you agree with his opinion, his post was directly relevant to the op.

a reply to: Toolman18

Depends on if you really think that the Giza sphinx was originally carved with an Egyptian pharaoh's head (I don't).

Oh, it also depends on if you choose to ignore that all around the same place are similar natural rock formations. Sometimes we must tell ourselves that nature can produce some really cool coincidences.

a reply to: Toolman18

Rather than dismissive, I'm a tad bit skeptical. It would be interesting if some archeologists would do a survey to see if it's worthy or a real dig.

sounds like your good friend pareidolia is making the rounds again...

a reply to: Revolution9

lol that last one is an photoshoop hoax by the worth1000 gang

a reply to: Toolman18

wat
did you just say that an very well know psycological phenomena is fake
wow! such audacity