It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: underwerks
Missed the video the first time, thanks!
Who knows what went on behind closed doors there, we can be sure it was nothing pro-legalization, that's for sure, but congress is keeping Sessions from dealing with the renewed reefer madness by denying him a budget to do it. So at least we have that going for now, and honestly I think the backlash that would be caused by federal enforcement would lead to Trump replacing him.
The legislation that prevents Attorney General Jeff Sessions from using federal law enforcement against medical marijuana in states where it's legal remains up in the air until December 22, the deadline for Congress to vote on the federal budget for next year.
Congress got a last-minute, two-week extension to figure out the federal budget, and has that time to decide whether to include the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment in an appropriations bill that funds the government––a decision the House Rules Committee will make behind closed doors, congressional staffers say.
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: underwerks
Of all the issues out there. Child sex trafficking, gang violence, an opiate epidemic....
He has the gall to waste time fighting marijuana legalization. It couldn't be more ass backwards
keep the prison business in business.
originally posted by: Oldtimer2
Wow and sounds like another libtard story,with everything but proof,some blow hards words,what publications?,when?,who are the witnesses,you guys are real lame thinking people are as gullible as you
originally posted by: Oldtimer2
Wow and sounds like another libtard story,with everything but proof,some blow hards words,what publications?,when?,who are the witnesses,you guys are real lame thinking people are as gullible as you
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
originally posted by: Oldtimer2
Wow and sounds like another libtard story,with everything but proof,some blow hards words,what publications?,when?,who are the witnesses,you guys are real lame thinking people are as gullible as you
It’s highly likely that only gullible liberals can see that massive photo in the OP, and you’re absolutely correct, only gullible liberals would constitute that as proof.
I don’t know where we would be without such magnificent input provided by the likes of yourself.
originally posted by: Oldtimer2
Wow and sounds like another libtard story,with everything but proof,some blow hards words,what publications?,when?,who are the witnesses,you guys are real lame thinking people are as gullible as you