Green proves simulation theory

a reply to: CircleofFloss

the green is very hidden, which also proves simulation theory.

No.

It proves light spectrum, wavelengths, and how it all works with the rods and cones in the human eye.






But by all means, do continue on with your "lack of green as proof to your simulation theory" thing.

Don't let any of us rip apart your wonderful fantasy.



.... because none of us are really here anyways.

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: gortex

where is it? around earth? and it's special isn't it, when you look at it? like wow, this is pretty amazing.

and not only that, but that hey guess what? this shtuff's electrical! ummm, hello??

Holy crap. I just read this whole thread, and I think I lost about 10 IQ points. I look forward to the OPs inevitable flat earth thread.

a reply to: dug88

if you divide the universe's bigness in half, would it matter?

a reply to: Indrasweb

lol what an awesome post

a reply to: Nothin

please state the nature of your query correctly, thank you.

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: dug88

if you divide the universe's bigness in half, would it matter?

Nope. There'd still be plenty of green.

a reply to: CranialSponge

can't you see that it's exactly how we respond to it that proves simulation theory?

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: dug88

if you divide the universe's bigness in half, would it matter?

😂

This is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever read on here.


I think I might get it as a tattoo..


I'll give you props for this thread man...

If it's a wind up then, well played..

And if not then.. well, it's provided me with a good bit of entertainment and it's been a welcome change from the trump sucks/is awesome threads...



Thanks

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: CranialSponge

can't you see that it's exactly how we respond to it that proves simulation theory?

Methinks you need to brush up on your definition of 'proof'. Cause the demonstrably false nonsense you're rambling about ain't it.

a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

exactly, because there aren't any smart people out there who believe in this simulation theory, are there genius?

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: dug88

if you divide the universe's bigness in half, would it matter?

No. You still haven't inspected all of it proving a lack of green either way.

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

exactly, because there aren't any smart people out there who believe in this simulation theory, are there genius?

I don't recall saying that. Perhaps you should work on reading comprehension as well.

a reply to: Indrasweb

ha, same here with your replies lol

a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

you could work on making a legitimate point

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

you could work on making a legitimate point

No need. Several others have already made legitimate points refuting your silly premise, and you've just ignored them.

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

you could work on making a legitimate point

Your OP is bunk because you can see green in places other than on Earth.

Case in point, a green comet in February 2017.

a reply to: dug88

you know, before Nasa, there was a time when all that existed, existed in this Galaxy. there used to be geniuses back then, full of mozarts creating symphonies, davincies painting Mona Lisas, and religious folks able to recite any part of their scripture from memory. today we have, umm, stuff I guess, and we think we know so much.

originally posted by: CircleofFloss
a reply to: dug88

you know, before Nasa, there was a time when all that existed, existed in this Galaxy.

Oh dear...