Kathie Hopkins talks to Americans about the UK and Sweden

Kathy Hopkins is an British firebrand regardless of your position on politics/social change. She is a female Nigel Farage. Formerly of The Daily Mail, she feels that it is her duty to speak out with a strong voice about her views on where her country is going and she gives warnings to America to not let it happen to that extent here. She is also funny with a strong sense of humor that is an indication that she ins not totally consumed by hatred as I'm sure some will say from this thoughtful video. If you tend to disagree with her, be sure and remark to yourself where she is partly wrong and totally wrong in your opinion. The results you find may be educational.

www.therebel.media...

a reply to: Aliensun




*crickets*

a reply to: Aliensun

Fascist racist

originally posted by: Indrasweb
a reply to: Aliensun




*crickets*

I assume that if I were from the UK I would understand the meaning of this term which must mean multiple games of a sport played on playing fields. On this side of the Atlantic it refers to a chirping, jumping insect that is frequently a nuisance.

a reply to: Aliensun We love Kate she has the moral courage to fight for her nation and to warn the west to the danger of the creeping cult masquerading as a religion. Winston Churchill would be proud of her "We must brace ourselves to our duty."

She is nothing more than a fascist racist self publicist, vile disgusting woman, who just needs to crawl back under a rock.

She's a real peach.....
wiki

She is a pain in the neck a lot of the time, but she does occasionally shine a light on stuff that needs discussing, much as the left want to ignore it.

I wouldn't say she is the most honest person out there, (she picks her stories) but it is stupid of people to ignore everything she says just because they don't like hearing it.

a reply to: Aliensun

1. She makes a good point about not letting the media control your perceptions of events. The media has an agenda. They will blow some things out of proportion, ignore things they don't want exposed, and flat out deny the existence of events they don't want publicized. You'll never know the real truth about the way things work if your only source of information is government controlled media.

2. One point on which I will disagree with her: she is not the biggest bitch in Britain. She forgot that we sent Piers Morgan back. On behalf of America, we apologize, but you guys started it.

3. Who is the male Nigel Farage?

originally posted by: SprocketUK

I wouldn't say she is the most honest person out there, (she picks her stories) but it is stupid of people to ignore everything she says just because they don't like hearing it.

It's got nothing to do with "don't like hearing it" -
I'd post a bunch of her tweets but she already deleted the bad ones, probably as she was sacked again this time by LBC, like when she was sacked by lefty paper - THE DAILY MAIL..

Here's a few off the top of my head

Refugees are cockroaches and we shouldn't mourn 2yr old kids washing up on our shores, essentially saying "F**k em".

Another one was saying about Jewish MP, former leader of the Labour Party Ed Milliband - Who's parents escaped Nazi Germany - saying no one likes his wife and he should stick her head in the oven and GAS her.

So far that's Jews and Muslims, lets carry on

on people with dementia, I'd write my summary of what she said but her quote speaks volumes

“Dementia sufferers should not be blocking beds. What is the point of life when you no longer know you are living it?,”

That's three things.. There's about 200 more. It's nothing to do with not wanting to hear it, she's despicable.

She's been sued and lost twice this year alone. At this point she has to leave the UK because her name is beyond ruined, I'm half expecting her to join Breitbart or Infowars.

a reply to: Taggart

She doesn't let her kids play with other kids whose names she doesn't like, some of those names she considers belong to the lower class.

Perhaps there is a position for her with team Trump .

originally posted by: Painterz
She is nothing more than a fascist racist self publicist, vile disgusting woman, who just needs to crawl back under a rock.

You are being too kind.

a reply to: Taggart

My personal favourite at the moment is her continued insistence that road traffic accident was a terrorist attack despite it being confirmed as an accident by the police.

a reply to: ScepticScot

We see that same mindset here on Ats, they watch a couple of YouTube vids and they think they have a good grasp on what is going on, the migrant crisis is a great example of that.

This narrow mindset has a kinda cult following.

Hopkins is a provocateur. She says outrageous things for the express purpose of harvesting the left wing outrage.

Sometimes I agree with her. Sometimes not. Regardless the reaction to her deliberate treading outside of 'acceptable group think' is always enjoyable.

originally posted by: Aliensun
Kathy Hopkins is an British firebrand regardless of your position on politics/social change. She is a female Nigel Farage. Formerly of The Daily Mail, she feels that it is her duty to speak out with a strong voice about her views on where her country is going and she gives warnings to America to not let it happen to that extent here. She is also funny with a strong sense of humor that is an indication that she ins not totally consumed by hatred as I'm sure some will say from this thoughtful video. If you tend to disagree with her, be sure and remark to yourself where she is partly wrong and totally wrong in your opinion. The results you find may be educational.

www.therebel.media...

She is just an attention whore who says things because it sells newspapers and gets her name around, nothing more.

The things she says are always outragous, often fabricated and agreed with only by idiotic far right leaning inbreads who do not realise her true intentions.

those who oppose her vocally or online are falling right into her trap as they give the stories far more attention by being outraged at her.

She is a truly despicable person but I admire her business acumen as she earn a lot of money doing what she does, no one does it better in fact.

Well. I dont know who she is, never heard of her before, but I thought her speech was rather entertaining, comical and to the point, in a light hearted way.
Its interesting that some people think she appeals to..."idiotic far right leaning inbreads"

Which begs the question, I wonder what "idiotic far Left leaning inbreads" think of her......perhaps the same?.

There use to be an old saying the Americans use to quote often, something like.....

"I may not agree with what you're saying, But I will fight to the death for you're right to say it."

Or something like that......I think it was called free speech, something many countries had fought for and people died for.....Freedom, Civil Liberties, free expression, etc etc.

Seems some people don't want that to exist in "Sophisticated Societies" anymore.

Still, the question must be asked....why in the World did the British invited millions of Non British people into those small isles, and possibly think nothing would happen to their (British) Culture, and everything would be hunky dory, and these incompatible peoples would assimilate and become one of them?

It hasn't worked anywhere else in the World, Sheet, it hadn't worked in Britannia and Londinium 2000 years ago.......

Certainly curious conduct by the Governments of the time...1950s-60s-70s.

Oh well.

originally posted by: gort51
Well. I dont know who she is, never heard of her before, but I thought her speech was rather entertaining, comical and to the point, in a light hearted way.
Its interesting that some people think she appeals to..."idiotic far right leaning inbreads"

Which begs the question, I wonder what "idiotic far Left leaning inbreads" think of her......perhaps the same?.

There use to be an old saying the Americans use to quote often, something like.....

"I may not agree with what you're saying, But I will fight to the death for you're right to say it."

Or something like that......I think it was called free speech, something many countries had fought for and people died for.....Freedom, Civil Liberties, free expression, etc etc.

Seems some people don't want that to exist in "Sophisticated Societies" anymore.

Still, the question must be asked....why in the World did the British invited millions of Non British people into those small isles, and possibly think nothing would happen to their (British) Culture, and everything would be hunky dory, and these incompatible peoples would assimilate and become one of them?

It hasn't worked anywhere else in the World, Sheep, it hadn't worked in Britannia and Londinium 2000 years ago.......

Certainly curious conduct by the Governments of the time...1950s-60s-70s.

Oh well.

She has the right to voice her opinion just like everyone else.

Just about everyone else likes to voice the opinion that she is a hidious troll and she is on the whole dispised as I said earlier.

My Grandfather fought in world war two and I am one hundred percent confident that had he lived to see the foul mouthed slag in action he would not stand and be proud that he had fought to protect her right to vocalise such a horrid opinion.

He would be more likley to launch something heavy in her general direction and call her a disgrace to humanity and he would be right to do so.

a reply to: nonspecific

Well, you could be right.

Shame he is no longer around to voice his opinion.

But do you think he would be happy with the state of England and the UK now?

Is the country now, the same one with the same ideals he fought for in WW2? And dreamt of what it would become?

Actually would be interesting to ask some WW2 veterans, if England has turned out as they had hoped in the 1940s....

My Grandfather fought for the Imperial forces in WW1, and my Great Uncle on my mothers side, died in the fields of France at 22yo for the glory of mother England in 1916.....and they travelled 10,000 miles to do it.

I wonder if many of the current, so called "British" over there, would even fight for your country anymore?

Or maybe they would abandon their women and seek refuge in the nearest free country as far away, and as fast as they could....maybe Africa somewhere.

originally posted by: gort51
a reply to: nonspecific

Well, you could be right.

Shame he is no longer around to voice his opinion.

But do you think he would be happy with the state of England and the UK now?

Is the country now, the same one with the same ideals he fought for in WW2? And dreamt of what it would become?

Actually would be interesting to ask some WW2 veterans, if England has turned out as they had hoped in the 1940s....

My Grandfather fought for the Imperial forces in WW1, and my Great Uncle on my mothers side, died in the fields of France at 22yo for the glory of mother England in 1916.....and they travelled 10,000 miles to do it.

I wonder if many of the current, so called "British" over there, would even fight for your country anymore?

Or maybe they would abandon their women and seek refuge in the nearest free country as far away, and as fast as they could....maybe Africa somewhere.

Well a couple of interesting questions there.

You do realise that the British still had a bit of an empire back then right?

Have a quick look here and any others you choose to find out some quite interesting stuff about who fought in the second world war.

Link

As to what he would think I assume you are talking about the immigrants?

I doubt he would be concerned as the empire meant we have always had immigrants, maybe they are from different countries now but not something that would have bothered him.

I think he would be more distraught at what a succesion of terrible governments have done, he lived in a mining community and when the tories shut the pits down in favour of imported cheaper coal it devastated it, mass unemployment, alcoholism and drug abuse took hold. Crime went up and the sense of community that the pits bought was decimated.

So people like hopkins and her upper class tory chums would be on the reciving end of his vitriol if anyone and not the hard working yet different skinned and religious commoners like him.