Corey Feldman's 1993 audio files naming alleged sexual predators found by Santa Barbara County Sher

Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office public information officer Kelly Hoover told Fox News on Tuesday night in an emailed statement, “Following the recent inquiries into the Sheriff’s Office interview of Mr. Feldman in 1993, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office conducted an additional review for any stored items remaining from the Michael Jackson investigation. In a container which included the original reports from the investigation, the Sheriff’s Office located some detective working copies of audio recordings made during the investigation. A copy of Mr. Feldman’s interview was located. The recording is being turned over to the Los Angeles Police Department.

Corey Feldman's 1993 audio files naming alleged sexual predators found by Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office

Looks like Corey Feldman was telling the truth all along. Of course Michael Jackson ties into it. I can't imagine there are many people who will be surprised by that connection.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

well well well.......and I just saw something about cory haim named michael jackson....glad feldman has been vindicated on this important part...we will see what comes of this

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Feldman has said on multiple occasions that Michael Jackson was one of the few that WASN'T a child molester.

Macaulay Culkin as well confirms MJ was not an abuser.

Quit libeling/slandering The King Of Pop, he was innocent.

The only people who said he was were scum bag con artists looking for a Payday.


ETA: The scumbag that came out last month and said Haim accused Jackson and Charlie Sheen 10 years ago,(in the National Enquirer no less) before his death, is the one Haim's mother said in fact had molested him. Double scum bag.

a reply to: research100

I highly doubt the LAPD will do something since they serve the LA Elite.

Not even Howard Hughes (He was going to make a movie exposing the Hollyweird Elite as far back as 1930s) can do it and he himself was a billionaire with powerful political connections.

a reply to: starwarsisreal

Statute of limitations has passed.

Nothing they can do.

a reply to: abe froman

Well if they want to investigate what's going on in Hollyweird, they need to start by looking into Howard Hughes' personal archives. It may give them some clues on where to start.

Here's the newspaper that features Howard Hughes attempts to expose Hollyweird:

www.abovetopsecret.com... (Scroll down to find the newspaper clipping)

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Feldman has said on multiple occasions that Michael Jackson was one of the few that WASN'T a child molester.

Macaulay Culkin as well confirms MJ was not an abuser.

Quit libeling/slandering The King Of Pop, he was innocent.

The only people who said he was were scum bag con artists looking for a Payday.


ETA: The scumbag that came out last month and said Haim accused Jackson and Charlie Sheen 10 years ago,(in the National Enquirer no less) before his death, is the one Haim's mother said in fact had molested him. Double scum bag.

Feldman has said it was one of the healthiest relationships he ever had.
King of pop is looking clean compared to the king of rock and his 13 year old girlfriend.

Actually just reading the thread and from the start knew people would be quick to judge and fast to accuse MJ. I knew him somewhat back in the day and never never got the creeper vibe from him at all. I did not believe any of the allegations against him.

Thanks for saying so against all others.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Thank you to Mr Feldman. Its about time this was brought to a head.

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: starwarsisreal

Statute of limitations has passed.

Nothing they can do.

so it could help get the ball rolling on other cases newer cases....getting it out there is important

a reply to: abe froman

Michael Jackson paid 200 million to as many as 20 kids.

www.dailymail.co.uk... ing-Pop-s-estate.html


Hard to believe he was innocent in all those cases.

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: starwarsisreal

Statute of limitations has passed.

Nothing they can do.

Maybe not legally, but with many things within a police department, I can easily see it getting "leaked", so to speak. Then, it's up to the terrible court of public opinion to ruin the people as it should. Then, others who were abused by these same people will come out and tell their stories, and I'm pretty certain there will be plenty of cases well within that statute to do something about it.

I always thought MJ was guilty but in recent years i doubted the official story more and more. Fact is that this is going on for a long time and the higher ups ignore it or paid the victims off. Burn it all down!

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: abe froman

Michael Jackson paid 200 million to as many as 20 kids.

www.dailymail.co.uk... ing-Pop-s-estate.html


Hard to believe he was innocent in all those cases.

A mere accusation can ruin one's name, so maybe the payment was meant to stop them from ruining his name further??

There's a video I wish I could find of a man who's ex-wife accused him of molesting his daughter. In the end, the courts not only proved the man didn't harm his daughter at all, he also got custody of his daughter because his ex-wife was such a terrible woman. I can never seem to find it, I remember the man met his wife via a race they were competing in, and they hit it off almost immediately. What kept it going for them was that they were both very competitive people. Unfortunately, in the end, it's what destroyed them.

I wish I could find the video, because the interviewer actually asked the guy how this accusation has affected his life, as well as the life of his daughter. The guy then answered the question with a question of his own: "Ok, so knowing all of this, knowing I was proven to be innocent......would you let your daughter stay over my house for a slumber party??"

"Uh, no."

"Exactly."

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan


Wow, vindication at hand I hope. This would mean they would now have to prosecute. I guess his mother is also a heartless woman, because she said he was lying, and only one person molested him. She said something like he was doing this for attention. I believed her, sadly.


I hope there aren't too many though, because of what he went through, not because I don't want justice for him, I do. I wonder when the names will be public? If this goes to court, we would have to wait till then? It states because it involves a child they could not say more.

a reply to: Necrobile

Would you let your son have a sleep over with michael?

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Necrobile

Would you let your son have a sleep over with michael?

Of course not, he's dead. That wouldn't be a very fun stay.

a reply to: Necrobile

But probably safer

Could be wrong, but MJ was never a child molester until after he screwed over Tommy Matola and Sony.

Dave Chapelle was never a crack head until he refused viacoms money, ect. and on and on

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Feldman has said on multiple occasions that Michael Jackson was one of the few that WASN'T a child molester.

Macaulay Culkin as well confirms MJ was not an abuser.

Quit libeling/slandering The King Of Pop, he was innocent.

The only people who said he was were scum bag con artists looking for a Payday.

It might just be that those Feldman tapes were in Jackson's police archive, because he was innocent, and Feldman said so on the tapes. That's more plausible than the other way round.