It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Who gives a fu## what Time Magazine claims are the persons of the year? They are yesterdays Fake News
I'm sure all 27 of their readers will be pleased with their choice
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
It's been announced.
It's the #MeToo movement. Apparently, Time is calling them "The Silence Breakers."
I'd say it's a solid choice. They've blown the lid off rampant sexual harassment / exploitation in Washington, Hollywood, and the MSM.
originally posted by: Tekaran
Meh, not really a person, but I get it. I too would agree on this one. I hope Hollywood and Politics continue to expose all the corruption.
originally posted by: Tekaran
Meh, not really a person, but I get it. I too would agree on this one. I hope Hollywood and Politics continue to expose all the corruption.
originally posted by: ColeYounger
originally posted by: Tekaran I hope Hollywood and Politics continue to expose all the corruption.
If all the corruption was exposed, there wouldn't BE a Hollywood. Nor politics.
originally posted by: ColeYounger
originally posted by: Tekaran I hope Hollywood and Politics continue to expose all the corruption.
If all the corruption was exposed, there wouldn't BE a Hollywood. Nor politics.
originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
The first few comments from the link made me chuckle.
Who gives a fu## what Time Magazine claims are the persons of the year? They are yesterdays Fake News
I'm sure all 27 of their readers will be pleased with their choice
Just shows the illiteracy of Time's "journalists". A person is a singular being. People are plural.
originally posted by: Nyiah
That's the best they could come up with for POTY? How disappointingly underwhelming. There's a myriad of major breakthroughs going on in the sciences alone -- CRISPR trials, functional artificial wombs, AI advancements, etc -- and none of those scientists hold a candle to...this crap?
I'll pass, thanks Time.