It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: TinfoilTP
What about America's fault for producing the technologies in the first place?
The blame game is a two-way street and threatening one another with nuclear proliferation is simply akin to playing chicken with a hand grenade and the pin removed, only a matter of time until the whole escapade ends in tears really.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Aliensun
This is not a weapon with a long reach.
A cruise missile cannot catch a ballistic missile in flight.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: TinfoilTP
I lived through the cold war buddy, it's not a nice way to travel wondering when the skies going to fall on your head.
Crap like Threads and When The Wind Blows scares wanes ta bits if truth be told, especially when Faslane naval base is pretty much on your doorstep.
I certainly don't wish the same for my children.
How about peace on Earth and goodwill toward Mankind after every bastard banker, politician, corporate CEO and media tycoon are hanging from a tree?
Now that i would pay to see.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: choos
a reply to: TinfoilTP
what about the ones that want a chance to live? just nuke em?? their fault for being born?
Kim's fault for making nukes that can reach the US.
originally posted by: liejunkie01
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: liejunkie01
It's still in testing. They haven't tested it in a couple years and were still trying to decide what missile body it can fit into. They're at least a couple years from operational at a minimum. They have to fit it into the body and then test it in that body.
Thank you for the info.
They had an "expert" on the news and he said that the military has a problem with trying to over engineer(or spend too much time trying to perfect everything). He said we should give our soldiers and personnel the equipment to use and experiment with on the battlefield. Which isn't a direct quote of course but it was the jist of what he was saying. It works, use it. Not necessarily in NK, but other conflicts.
We have all of these shiny expensive toys hanging out in warehouses and labs, spend billions on them and don't really get much out of them.
I kind of agree with him a little. Strap the thing to something and roll with it. Learn in the field.
But what do I know?
Hillbilly armor should make your blood boil with pure anger and sadness not fill you with pride!
Finally, what is not reported or people choose to forget because it shows the hillbilly armor story to be naked propaganda masking grievous and institutionalized incompetence is that the hillbilly armor was of wildly varying actual effectiveness that ranged all the way between actively worse than nothing to "meh it's at least kinda helping".... But realistically actual instances of it being truly effective just aren't there.
originally posted by: liejunkie01
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: liejunkie01
It's still in testing. They haven't tested it in a couple years and were still trying to decide what missile body it can fit into. They're at least a couple years from operational at a minimum. They have to fit it into the body and then test it in that body.
Thank you for the info.
They had an "expert" on the news and he said that the military has a problem with trying to over engineer(or spend too much time trying to perfect everything). He said we should give our soldiers and personnel the equipment to use and experiment with on the battlefield. Which isn't a direct quote of course but it was the jist of what he was saying. It works, use it. Not necessarily in NK, but other conflicts.
We have all of these shiny expensive toys hanging out in warehouses and labs, spend billions on them and don't really get much out of them.
I kind of agree with him a little. Strap the thing to something and roll with it. Learn in the field.
But what do I know?