It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dashen
originally posted by: muzzleflash
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: muzzleflash
Interested in your opinion of this.
I have a tenant who is an older Indian man who's a Christian. He is convinced his upstairs and downstairs neighbors are witches and satanists. He combats them by Smashing brooms and other things into his ceiling and floor to distract their Satanic rituals. He also plays Christian music at the highest volume day and night to protect him from their witchcraft and other dark practices.
His neighbors just wonder why he won't let them sleep day or night.
Is this old man misunderstood or in need of psychological help?
. He is just plain wrong and believes in fiction.
Interesting.
Very interesting.
How would you know if you were plain wrong and just believing in fiction?
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: muzzleflash
This pure laziness on your part and proof you have not thoroughly researched your OP. There is literally a scholarly journal called Psychosis
You kind of just turned your entire OP into a joke.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: muzzleflash
What does having a mental disorder have to do with being a madman? The issue here is you are projecting.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: muzzleflash
Apples and Oranges. You can actually go and read the peer reviewed papers in Psychosis and "eviscerate" them. Go for it. You can see their data as well as their methodology. Pick one, any one, and "eviscerate" it.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: muzzleflash
You really don't know what an ad hominem is...you should look up the definition. You obviously have access to a thesaurus as you continue to use words out of place, I would suggest a dictionary as well. I am attacking your position, not you. I believe your position is one of projecting. It sounds like people have either called you crazy (It's happened here a lot), or tried to prove you are crazy (hence all the tests you admit to constantly), and this is your rebuttal. That's an observation, not an attack, and totally within the realm of your OP.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: muzzleflash
You really don't know what an ad hominem is...you should look up the definition.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: muzzleflash
Apples and Oranges.
My claim was "Schizophrenia does not exist at all beyond it's indefinite abstraction as an ambiguous label, therefore it is a myth".
originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Here I'll blow your mind -
Not only is homosexuality not a mental illness - but there is no such thing as homosexuality.
There is just "sexuality".
Putting labels on people and convincing them to identify with those labels is irrational and essentially politics mixed with social engineering.
Homosexuality doesn't even exist as a mental condition.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
And unfortunately exactly what you feared has played out with several posters, including a recent one. It's obviously a myth, throw those meds out the window...