It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: fiverx313
additionally, the burden of both transportation and free time during normal working hours are burdens that fall disproportionately on poor citizens. because of the economic fact that more of our black citizens live in poverty, this disproportionately affects our black citizens as well. therefore, yes, it is racist both in practice and in intent.
originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: fiverx313
Your exact words are not the expected desire. I seriously don't feel like having to explain what is already in plain English.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
How did what you said prove intent to discriminate? Did you think people were going to miss that little leap in logic?
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: fiverx313
I dunno where you lived in VA that the nearest DMV was an hour away, considering how many offices they have. Most of which are open on Saturdays.
And I dunno how long ago you were able to get a photo ID without presenting any identifying document, because they've required both the application and something that proves your identity for many, many years.
originally posted by: fiverx313
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: fiverx313
I dunno where you lived in VA that the nearest DMV was an hour away, considering how many offices they have. Most of which are open on Saturdays.
it is really that hard to think i could actually be telling the truth?
since it seems mind-boggling to you and others that anyone could actually have any trouble getting a voter ID, i will fill in some details. i was living in chincoteague. the dmv wasn't an option because i was keeping my maryland driver's license, as i was moving again shortly and didn't feel like going through that hassle. even if i had, the closest dmv to chincoteague is still not all that close. considering that there are many people who don't drive who might still like to vote, i feel that's probably relevant to a broader discussion of the topic.
the county office was in accomac. in the interests of STRICT accuracy since i'm so unbelievable to begin with, it seems like more of an hour and a half round-trip than two hours.
And I dunno how long ago you were able to get a photo ID without presenting any identifying document, because they've required both the application and something that proves your identity for many, many years.
i don't know either, but that is, in fact, what happened. i found it so unbelievable at the time that i posted it on my personal social media as well. no one who lived in virginia at that time disputed my account.
forgive me if i don't post screenshots, though. you'll have to either decide i'm lying for my own nefarious agenda, or that it is, in fact, what happened.
in the interests of STRICT accuracy since i'm so unbelievable to begin with, it seems like more of an hour and a half round-trip than two hours.
i found it so unbelievable
There's nothing racist whatsoever about requiring people to have an ID to vote. We do that to ensure that the voting system is fair and legal.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: trollz
There's nothing racist whatsoever about requiring people to have an ID to vote. We do that to ensure that the voting system is fair and legal.
Except when you show up to vote the polling center is 'closed', or so slow it takes hours waiting on line or the machines are 'broke' or the voting register is 'misplaced' or your name isn't in it.
How many unfair practices loopholes are there, 'legally'?
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: trollz
There's nothing racist whatsoever about requiring people to have an ID to vote. We do that to ensure that the voting system is fair and legal.
Except when you show up to vote the polling center is 'closed', or so slow it takes hours waiting on line or the machines are 'broke' or the voting register is 'misplaced' or your name isn't in it.
How many unfair practices loopholes are there, 'legally'?
Background and History
The idea of taking away a criminal's right to vote has been around since ancient Greece and Rome. A condition called "civil death" in Europe involved the forfeiture of property, the loss of the right to appear in court, and a prohibition on entering into contracts, as well as the loss of voting rights. Civil death was brought to America by English colonists, but most aspects of it were eventually abolished, leaving only felon disenfranchisement intact in some parts of modern America.
Categories of Disenfranchisement
State approaches to felon disenfranchisement vary tremendously. In Maine and Vermont, felons never lose their right to vote, even while they are incarcerated. In Florida, Iowa and Virginia, felons and ex-felons permanently lose their right to vote. Virginia and Florida have supplementary programs which facilitate gubernatorial pardons. The remaining states each have their own approaches to the issue.
Roughly 6.1 million voting-age American citizens who have been convicted of crimes are restricted from voting in next week’s presidential election because of felon disenfranchisement laws.
That’s about 2.5 percent of the total U.S. voting-age population – 1 of every 40 adults – that can’t vote because of a current or previous felony conviction, according to recent analysis by the Sentencing Project, a criminal justice reform group.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: scraedtosleep
There have been a lot of studies on this subject with real data not just superstitious delusions:
How Voter ID Laws Discriminate
The right uses all kinds of tactics for voter suppression. But nobody really likes democracy anyway.