It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A recent study published in the peer-reviewed journal Molecular Vision says prolonged exposure to blue light with a wavelength between 400–470 nanometers can “induce severe damage to the retina.”
Even brief periods of exposure to blue light in this range can damage the retinal pigment epithelium. Damaged RPE eventually leads to photoreceptor cell death,” the study says. If enough photoreceptor cells die, total blindness can occur.
One of the world’s top photobiologists has been trying to warn the public for years about the dangers of the government-mandated phasing out of incandescent lighting.
While LEDs (light-emitting diodes) are up to 95 percent more energy efficient than incandescent bulbs, we are paying for that savings with our health. A physician and lecturer at Wismar University in Germany, Alexander Wunsch is an international consultant to governments, medical facilities and the lighting industry.
His message, though often ignored, is clear: blue light, isolated from all the other colors on the light spectrum, is damaging our retinas and disrupting our endocrine systems, resulting in all sorts of physical and mental illness.
It’s not a message the LED industry, governments looking to cut carbon emissions, or consumers saving money on electricity want to hear. But, as this Harvard Medical School report says, it is “backed up by study after study.”
While cool LED bulbs emit more blue light than warm LED bulbs, the label “warm” can be deceptive. They give out a warmer “looking” light because the blue light is masked with a yellow or orange filter, but they do not emit a red wavelength.
When buying bulbs, look at their CRI or color rendering index, Munsch says. Sunlight, which is the gold standard, has a CRI of 100. So do incandescent bulbs and candles.
If you must buy LED bulbs, look for a CRI of 97, which is the closest they come to natural light. LEDs are the most dangerous at night, Munsch says, as there is no counterbalancing red light.
The biological risks of artificial light are somewhat mitigated if you have plenty of sunlight streaming through windows, but if that’s the case, why have lights on at all?
Munsch says being in darkness after sunset is optimal. Candle light is enough for orientation, he says, but if we must do activities that require more light, he highly recommends getting our hands on incandescent bulbs
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: Realtruth
He is probably onto something.
However this can probably rectified by using some filters to keep the harmful part of the light from reaching us.
While cool LED bulbs emit more blue light than warm LED bulbs, the label “warm” can be deceptive. They give out a warmer “looking” light because the blue light is masked with a yellow or orange filter, but they do not emit a red wavelength.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: Realtruth
They should do studies worldwide comparing those who spend long periods in locations with leds and those who spend less. Outdoor workers vs office workers for example.
One thing is true, they certainly have pushed leds in Europe, to the point where the old incandescent bulbs are illegal almost now.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
I can't believe they could be worse than horrible florescent lights.
The color, the hum,,, ugg