It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Harte
Here we go again.
Please point out any slanderous remarks I've made in this thread.
Harte
The idea that the Celts were drawn from the same dispersal out of the southeast into southwest Europe is also attractive because it explains readily the commonalities between Celtic and Italic languages; it also harmonizes with the relative lack of DNA "signals" that would link the inhabitants of Western Europe with those of Central Europe. It fits quite well into the emerging picture of Indo-European dispersals out of Southeastern Europe, with Italo-Celts being responsible for maritime pioneer colonization across the northern Mediterranean
Dienekes Blog
The "Italo-Celts" .ie, Tuscans were certainly a Minoan influncenced culture, and it is of interesting note that the Maritime Beaker culture moves backwards against the basic flow, from britain, to the atlantic coast of iberia then to the med. and to finally contribute to the pre etruscan Villanova culture. The way I see it, the Minoans were businessmen, more than colonizers or conquerors, they provided the ships and the security manpower, through their mercenaries, to move goods to the eastern med, as long as you did it on their terms.
The idea that the Celts were drawn from the same dispersal out of the southeast into southwest Europe is also attractive because it explains readily the commonalities between Celtic and Italic languages; it also harmonizes with the relative lack of DNA "signals" that would link the inhabitants of Western Europe with those of Central Europe. It fits quite well into the emerging picture of Indo-European dispersals out of Southeastern Europe, with Italo-Celts being responsible for maritime pioneer colonization across the northern Mediterranean
Well seeing he said A Heavy Presence according too BBC he is right
.. well more less the Influence ,
and whos to say a Travel for Trade, Here and there
originally posted by: jeep3r
a reply to: soberbacchus
The intricate details are really finely crafted. According to the NatGeo article, the stone is 1.4 inches in length (or about 3.6 cm). Just to provide a sense of scale, I created a collage with a match for comparison, matches are usually about 4 cm in length.
Match head up close:
Although we're not dealing with nano-scale features here, the smallest details are well within the range of some tens of micrometers which is quite remarkable.