Are The "Trump Tapes" Fake or Not!?

a reply to: thepixelpusher

The Hillary sex tape was released months ago. It was made the old fashioned way, with a double. If QAnon is talking about a new incriminating tape don't hold your breath. The storm has yet to break.

a reply to: DJW001

Care to prove the Hillary tape was released and shows a double?

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

Care to prove the Hillary tape was released and shows a double?

Look at the date on the Newsweek article you linked to without reading, apparently. The fake video has been discussed here before, and T&C forbids linking to it.

a reply to: DJW001

Oh, I read the article. Did you!?

Not asking you to link to it, just prove it exists. I see no results for it on the web and if it was discussed here you should easily be able to direct me to the discussion. Balls in your court to prove what you say is true. I don't see any evidence for what you claim.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

Oh, I read the article. Did you!?

Not asking you to link to it, just prove it exists. I see no results for it on the web and if it was discussed here you should easily be able to direct me to the discussion. Balls in your court to prove what you say is true. I don't see any evidence for what you claim.

It's on the "dark web." Your original post implied that you believed the video exists and that liberals are making excuses for it. I don't care either way... Although you lot seem to be preparing for the Trump Moscow tapes.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

Oh, I read the article. Did you!?

Not asking you to link to it, just prove it exists. I see no results for it on the web and if it was discussed here you should easily be able to direct me to the discussion. Balls in your court to prove what you say is true. I don't see any evidence for what you claim.

It's on the "dark web." Your original post implied that you believed the video exists and that liberals are making excuses for it. I don't care either way... Although you lot seem to be preparing for the Trump Moscow tapes.

On the dark web, eh? Sure, sure...and no journalists have been able to find it and publish it, and no lefties either. Let me guess, fairies, orcs and pixies are real too.

a reply to: DJW001

I'm taking that you cannot back up your claim there was already a Hillary video leaked with a fake actress, and there are no Trump Moscow tapes either as you claim. You're batting 2 for 2.

You cannot even provide a link to the supposed discussion of the Hillary tape here as you also claimed. That's 3 for 3, and the Umpire has called you OUT!

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

I'm taking that you cannot back up your claim there was already a Hillary video leaked with a fake actress, and there are no Trump Moscow tapes either as you claim. You're batting 2 for 2.

You cannot even provide a link to the supposed discussion of the Hillary tape here as you also claimed. That's 3 for 3, and the Umpire has called you OUT!

You are the one who posted the story as though it supported your case. It does not matter if there is a Clinton tape. If there is a Trump tape he and his acolytes will deny it is him. Even if it is. He has even started to deny it was him on the grabbing tape... after acknowledging it was him and dismissing it as locker room talk.

a reply to: DJW001

No, it was YOU who said a Hillary tape and the Trump Moscow tapes exist. And, further you said there was discussion of the Hillary tape here already to support your claim. Guess your claims are NOT SUPPORTED then. Thought so.

a reply to: thepixelpusher

It's not my fault ATS's search function is less than perfect. Google "Hillary Clinton sex tape." It is available now on choice pornographic sites. Then you tell me if it is really her or a double.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

No, it was YOU who said a Hillary tape and the Trump Moscow tapes exist. And, further you said there was discussion of the Hillary tape here already to support your claim. Guess your claims are NOT SUPPORTED then. Thought so.

Pixel, please explain yourself. You posted a link to a months old article about alleged "Hillary Clinton sex tapes" to make it look like liberals are using the same denial tactics as Trump, and when I pointed out that the topic was old and has already been discussed and dismissed, you challenged me to prove the tapes are real. What was the point? I can't imagine someone with your sterling reputation would be trolling, so what is your point?

Oh, and Public, did you actually try searching with the "safety" off?

You said the tape of Hillary was already out. Can't see it anywhere and no one else can. Secondly, you said there were Trump Moscow tapes. Nothing on that either. Thirdly, you said the Hillary tapes were already discussed on ATS..no evidence of that either. You've struck out and your argument is highly suspect with absolutely nothing to back it up!

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
You said the tape of Hillary was already out. Can't see it anywhere and no one else can. Secondly, you said there were Trump Moscow tapes. Nothing on that either. Thirdly, you said the Hillary tapes were already discussed on ATS..no evidence of that either. You've struck out and your argument is highly suspect with absolutely nothing to back it up!

For the record, only the second of those claims is unverified. Now please answer the questions I posed above.

a reply to: DJW001

I did search and not even the press have a story on a Hillary tape. The point overall is that this tech can be used by underhanded people to create fake events. Look at the examples early in this thread. Pretty convincing.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

I did search and not even the press have a story on a Hillary tape. The point overall is that this tech can be used by underhanded people to create fake events. Look at the examples early in this thread. Pretty convincing.

So this is a preemptive strike. If Comey was wearing a wire, the recording is bogus. If "Stormy" taped their tryst, it's fake. If Russia produces a recording of any kind, it can't be real. Just what are you anticipating that you are so worried?

a reply to: DJW001

Technologies To Create Fake Audio And Video Are Quickly Evolving



a reply to: DJW001

Even NPR agrees with me.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Technologies To Create Fake Audio And Video Are Quickly Evolving

a reply to: DJW001

Even NPR agrees with me.

So you are getting more and more worried that incriminating recordings are out there. Good. They are. It does not matter if they are real or not... Trump supporters will claim they are fake, no matter what.

a reply to: DJW001

Hold your horses, there's no indication of Trump Tapes at all despite Comey's pathetic interviews.

If you bothered to read my OP you'd know this technology is a grave concern to any party in the USA and other governments, not just trump, and with the potential for abuse at a high level to influence people in through the lame stream media.

a reply to: thepixelpusher

Hold your horses, there's no indication of Trump Tapes at all despite Comey's pathetic interviews.

The fat lady has not yet sung. In addition to the "grabbing" tape, which Trump has tried to pretend was a fake, there will be several more tapes emerging in the near future. You can count on it. The MGB has a whole department dedicated to creating them.

If you bothered to read my OP you'd know this technology is a grave concern to any party in the USA and other governments, not just trump, and with the potential for abuse at a high level to influence people in through the lame stream media.

Of course, you have it exactly wrong. It has always been possible to "fake evidence:"





The danger is not that the media will use false images to deceive citizens. That has always been done. The danger is that the knowledge of these technologies will cause people to reject the truth. That is clearly the intent of this thread. You can never prove guilt because there is no evidence that cannot be "faked." Fortunately, character is the ultimate witness. Trump is his own worst enemy.