-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account-

originally posted by: loveguy
a reply to: FauxMulder

If I may refer to numbers 3 & 4 gigi sims;

It was claimed that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, none were produced...

So this guy working for Saddam with aid from Russia escaped Iraqi Freedom hit list?

Keeping tabs on this guy doesn't give the IC any award winning commendations.

I should confess I didn't click the link.

Click these links.

Soldiers were indeed exposed to Iraq's WMD

Also here

And here.

Further, it's a matter of historical record that Saddam used WMD against the Kurds and the Iranians. We know for a fact he had them. What we got wrong is that they weren't actively producing them anymore. All we found were old stockpiles. Many chemical and biological weapons have a shelf life. However, after the shelf life is up it only reduces the effectiveness of them, it doesn't make them safe. So the fact that all they had were old stockpiles is really moot. They did have WMD and we did find them.

MSM coming - BIG WAY.

We see all.
We hear all.
FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT.
CONSPIRACYpush coming.

MSM
W
W
3
CONSPIRACY
COMING

This is not a rabbit hole.

It is an anthill.

I have a theory about Hawaii, which pulls together a couple of pieces of evidence:

There are reports of people who say they heard explosions, and think there were real missiles that were intercepted.

Q did say "Defcon 1" and "Non-nuclear" before the Hawaii missile alert.

Perhaps Trump had a submarine fire a couple of Tomahawk missiles towards Hawaii, for the specific purpose of triggering a missile alert, which would prompt that NSA facility to begin the Bulk Data Transfer. The missiles would presumably be programmed to either self-destruct or land harmlessly off-shore. If the American origin of the missiles was ever discovered, it could be explained as a military exercise that strayed a bit too close to shore.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
I have a theory about Hawaii, which pulls together a couple of pieces of evidence:

There are reports of people who say they heard explosions, and think there were real missiles that were intercepted.

Q did say "Defcon 1" and "Non-nuclear" before the Hawaii missile alert.

Perhaps Trump had a submarine fire a couple of Tomahawk missiles towards Hawaii, for the specific purpose of triggering a missile alert, which would prompt that NSA facility to begin the Bulk Data Transfer. The missiles would presumably be programmed to either self-destruct or land harmlessly off-shore. If the American origin of the missiles was ever discovered, it could be explained as a military exercise that strayed a bit too close to shore.

THAT'S the basic theory.
Length of the Bulk Data Transfer could also explain the 38 minute 'False Alarm' delay.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
I have a theory about Hawaii, which pulls together a couple of pieces of evidence:

There are reports of people who say they heard explosions, and think there were real missiles that were intercepted.

Q did say "Defcon 1" and "Non-nuclear" before the Hawaii missile alert.

Perhaps Trump had a submarine fire a couple of Tomahawk missiles towards Hawaii, for the specific purpose of triggering a missile alert, which would prompt that NSA facility to begin the Bulk Data Transfer. The missiles would presumably be programmed to either self-destruct or land harmlessly off-shore. If the American origin of the missiles was ever discovered, it could be explained as a military exercise that strayed a bit too close to shore.

And why would you execute this plan even remotely close enough to shore that people could hear the missiles detonate?

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: loveguy
a reply to: FauxMulder

If I may refer to numbers 3 & 4 gigi sims;

It was claimed that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, none were produced...

So this guy working for Saddam with aid from Russia escaped Iraqi Freedom hit list?

Keeping tabs on this guy doesn't give the IC any award winning commendations.

I should confess I didn't click the link.

Click these links.

Soldiers were indeed exposed to Iraq's WMD

Also here

And here.

Further, it's a matter of historical record that Saddam used WMD against the Kurds and the Iranians. We know for a fact he had them. What we got wrong is that they weren't actively producing them anymore. All we found were old stockpiles. Many chemical and biological weapons have a shelf life. However, after the shelf life is up it only reduces the effectiveness of them, it doesn't make them safe. So the fact that all they had were old stockpiles is really moot. They did have WMD and we did find them.

I stand corrected. Thanks.

My physiology seems weird, I'm guessing this info is meant to make me cry and ask for help.
But in reality, this info makes me very angry and I desire justice across the board.

I woke up this am to the news that my favorite female singer is gone now.
Zombie interpretation

The message I receive with tears in my eyes.

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
I have a theory about Hawaii, which pulls together a couple of pieces of evidence:

There are reports of people who say they heard explosions, and think there were real missiles that were intercepted.

Q did say "Defcon 1" and "Non-nuclear" before the Hawaii missile alert.

Perhaps Trump had a submarine fire a couple of Tomahawk missiles towards Hawaii, for the specific purpose of triggering a missile alert, which would prompt that NSA facility to begin the Bulk Data Transfer. The missiles would presumably be programmed to either self-destruct or land harmlessly off-shore. If the American origin of the missiles was ever discovered, it could be explained as a military exercise that strayed a bit too close to shore.

And why would you execute this plan even remotely close enough to shore that people could hear the missiles detonate?

I don't know where the people were, in boats or wherever. But the simplest and surest way to set off a missile alert would be to actually fire missiles. You'd just need to make sure the missiles don't actually hit anyone. As I said, if they really needed to offer an explanation, the Navy could issue a statement saying something like "Oops, our bad. We were testing missile interception technology, and it didn't go as well as we hoped. Rest assured that the missiles were unarmed, and the citizens of Hawaii were never in any danger."

a reply to: IAMTAT

For sure, the "False Alarm" message was sent once it was confirmed that the data had been received.

Question: in the event that an alarm is triggered, can we assume the origin of the object is known?
I ask because Japan did the same thing earlier today (yesterday?). they set off an alarm due to an incoming nk missile. of course, it wasn't...
but where are they claiming the Hawaii "missile" originated from?

originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: dashen

So each major port has a US terminal and many of them have additional terminals run by other countries that we are trading partners with. That doesn't sound practical at all. Must be totally nefarious.

Note how it only discusses the 15 major ports and ignores the other 80+ ports. This is done when you're writing in order to give people a certain impression. It appears the author was quite successful.

I completely agree with this, and I haven't even looked at the list to see which ports are in question, but I'd bet most of the major ports are also home to naval facilities (San Diego, Norfolk, etc), which might leave you vulnerable to SIGINT, for example. But I agree this is probably a non story. I imagine oversight is pretty tight, but who knows.

I'm popping in here just to drop this for future evaluation regarding ports and logistical transport.

J&C and IMTAT, you will both remember a past thread related to the Black Ivy Group which was started by Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton's chief of staff at the State Dept. among other things.

Cashing in on State Department Deal-Making

If you don't like the source, there are plenty of other places you can find the information.

There is also a Black Ivy Group LLC that was located in Arkansas....hmmm:
www.entitysource.com...
businessprofiles.com...

a reply to: queenofswords

J&C and IMTAT, you will both remember a past thread related to the Black Ivy Group started by Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton's chief of staff at the State Dept. among other things.

You mean this one, "Cheryl Mills, BlackIvy, & BlackStone,?"


Yeah, I recall that somewhat, lol.

originally posted by: PolyCottonBlend
Question: in the event that an alarm is triggered, can we assume the origin of the object is known?
I ask because Japan did the same thing earlier today (yesterday?). they set off an alarm due to an incoming nk missile. of course, it wasn't...
but where are they claiming the Hawaii "missile" originated from?

They're currently saying it was a false alarm, and there was no missile. But if we're talking about fooling some guys in an NSA facility into hitting the "Emergency Backup" button, then it doesn't matter where the missile is supposed to be coming from. If you supposedly have only minutes before you get nuked into oblivion, you're not going to take the time to look into that.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

indeed.

I guess I was thinking more along the lines of an automated response, not taking into account the "somebody pushed the button" claim.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

and LOOP CAPITAL was an underwriter for the BLACKSTONE IPO stock offering

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

They're currently saying it was a false alarm, and there was no missile.

This vid blurb popped up the other day and cant get it out of my mind ...could it be a answer to both false alarms ?

a reply to: face23785

If it's not nefarious and why was Chuck Schumer suddenly overcome with the compulsion to actually do his job in 2006 and sound an alarm about the National Security dilemmas facing us with this reality

a reply to: Phoenix

If Twitchy caught these tweets right ... there's the guy sitting there with passwords posted right on his monitor, and it somehow got broadcast to the general public.

And per Hot Air ... this is a screen grab of the alert interface menu.

Both are pretty bad.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

POSTING AS A HEADSUP... but I'll edit when I find the official BBC page... (assuming it's not "fake news"/cabal messaging)

(I suppose this serves me right for wondering where and when the tentacles of the swamp would touch 'Ol Blighty.)

TV; BBC News 24; "Outside Source"; approx. 21:25 GMT... a piece was narrated about some businesses promoting that there be a change in the expectation that a company's only responsibility is to it's shareholders.

They were pushing for businesses to have a legal responsibility to the community.

It did not get my full attention until a full screen quartered picture of logos came up.... with BLACKROCK logo in bottom left... WTF?