LAPD confirms investigating Hollywood pedophile ring after Corey Feldman files report

a reply to: daskakik

You're victim shaming. That's how that works in your world I guess. Don't pretend that's not what you're posting.

a reply to: thepixelpusher

Call it whatever you want. I honestly don't care.

The facts are still the same no matter what you call it.

a reply to: daskakik

And those facts are that you victim shame. Feldman is trying to expose this but armchair trolls like you can only see what he hasn't done. Serial victim shamers.

a reply to: thepixelpusher

That is actually just your opinion.

Besides, even if that was a fact, that is not the facts I was referring to. You seem to have a hard time following the flow of the conversation.

a reply to: daskakik

Oh, I get you loud and clear. You felt comfortable shaming the victim for not overcoming their abuse and being effective in warning others, even when police and media ignore them. Your posts repeated that constantly. I follow your thinking very well.

That was 20 years after having the info. He could have still sought out other platforms.

Your quote, and may I say it's inaccurate as he spoke to the police in the 90's within a 10 year window, not 20 years as you claim.

I know some adults that were abused as children and they take many years to cope. Some having to overcome drugs that took to cope. But you seem to think they should be whole instantly and rectify things immediately. That is what you are saying in your posts. Corey didn't things fast enough or well enough.

a reply to: thepixelpusher

Actually that post is another example because that isn't what I'm talking about. It is you setting up strawmen arguments to knock down.

I'm not the topic of this thread.

a reply to: daskakik

I'm not the topic of this thread.

That was 20 years after having the info. He could have still sought out other platforms.

Not all all, but your arguments are a bizarre victim blaming distortion of the facts. Just pointing that out. You claim to be superior and have all the answers, but don't walk the talk. have you no empathy for the fallen among us!!??

a reply to: thepixelpusher

I already said I'm not blaming him for what happened.

I said he should have named names. Of course there are many reasons why he didn't do that for 30 years but that doesn't change the fact that he didn't.

You are the one twisting this very simple observation to set up a strawman.

ETA: Don't walk the talk? Well it's a little too late for me to be a teen hollywood star who is sexually abused in order for me to walk the talk.

a reply to: daskakik

You still don't get it. You pretend to have infinite knowledge of his life and what he should or shouldn't have done. Otherwise why would you judge him so harshly!!?? Stop the tennis match posts and own up to your viewpoint.

I said he should have named names. Of course there are many reasons why he didn't do that for 30 years

Sorry he went to the police in the 90's and his abuse was in the 80's. the police have the names. He put himself at risk a long time ago pal. Blame the Police or the Media for the protection they afforded his abusers, don't blame him as you surely are. Sad.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: daskakik

You still don't get it. You pretend to have infinite knowledge of his life and what he should or shouldn't have done.

Another strawman. I never said that. I said that he didn't name names a lot earlier than now. That is just a fact.

Otherwise why would you judge him so harshly!!?? Stop the tennis match posts and own up to your viewpoint.

I'm not judging him. I don't care enough about him to call him and tell him that he should have named names.

ETA: He named names now without the need for the police or other media. What changed?

a reply to: daskakik

I said he should have named names.

How is that not a judgement without knowing what he'd already done? He went to the authorities and NAMED NAMES, which is who you go to for crimes like this. And still you are not satisfied! Certainly you now know he went to the Police and the Media as this thread pointed out. What magic answer do you have to make people take notice.

ETA: He named names now without the need for the police or other media. What changed?

He publicly revealed one name already, at his own financial and great legal risk since in California the limits of prosecution have passed, and I haven't seen any arrests or warrants yet. So what perfect answer do you have?? Well.....I'm waiting????

a reply to: thepixelpusher

He didn't publicly name names until recently. What changed?

a reply to: daskakik

Please read my post above, before you respond.

a reply to: daskakik

He named names to the Police way back in the 90's, so an invetigation could verify the crimes. How can you have not read that here so far!!!??? That was the appropriate channel, not the court of public opinion. You see how you victim blame him along with Barbara Walters over this. I think the Police was the right choice, you seem to think he should have posted billboards over Hollywood at his expense, I guess. You blame the victim.

a reply to: thepixelpusher

Same question, what changed?

Why is he able to do it now but not 30 or 20 or even 10 years ago? I'm sure there is a good enough reason but it simply doesn't change the fact that he didn't.

Also, I don't even know what you mean by perfect answer. You either name names or you don't. I never said one was the perfect way of doing things.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
He named names to the Police way back in the 90's, so an invetigation could verify the crimes. How can you have not read that here so far!!!??? That was the appropriate channel, not the court of public opinion.

I saw that, that isn't what I'm talking about.

That doesn't change the fact that if all he had was the court of public opinion then he could have used that.

a reply to: daskakik

What changed!!? The inaction of his earlier attempt with the Police is what changed!! Keep up with the thread. He named the names like you asked, but got no results. He went on The View media and got no results. As shameful as it is, these avenues failed us and him. Did Barbara Walter ask for names!!!?? No, she choose to chastise him!!!!!!! Don't be an additional abuser and blame Feldman. Your points are disturbing to anyone who has suffered this fate. Have you no empathy!!??

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
What changed!!? The inaction of his earlier attempt with the Police is what changed!! Keep up with the thread. he named the names like you asked, but got no results. he went on The View media and got no results.

No, there is still inaction. The PD said he never named names.

As shameful as it is, this avenues failed us and him. Don't be an additional abuser and blame Feldman. You points are disturbing to anyone who has suffered this fate. Seems you have no moral compass.

Yes they did and that is why I'm not talking about those platforms but others. Seems you still can't quite get a handle on that.

Just for the record, statute of limitations for unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor in california is 3 years. The statute of limitations had gone by even in 1993.

a reply to: daskakik

Wrong. They said they didn't have complete records from that far back! Again, recently he contacted Police to give them names again when he found that out.

Proof positive! Watch it to see you are dead wrong!

a reply to: thepixelpusher

How is a video of Feldman proof of what the PD said?