What happened to all the non-blob UFOs?

Going back through the history of UFOlogy there were some pretty cool photos of aliens and UFOs. Back when I was a youngster I was more than convinced by these alien spacecraft. The attention to detail by those Nazi scientists, and Adamski's photos were nothing short of spectacular. Even Billy Meier was able to give us an image of a quite unique and detailed craft.

Look at some of these.









The fact that all of these images are fake is beside the point. At the time these images seemed convincing.

Compare today's sightings which are usually indistinct blobs of light in the sky. One would think with the graphical processing ability of computers that hoaxers would be able to produce a convincing looking UFO, but my my own searchings just show lights in the sky that could be anything.

It's disappointing, like the mythological bigfoot/blurfoot, it seems our best images are from the past.

It wouldn't be too much to ask some hoaxer to create a convincing image so I can believe again, at least for a few minutes until the image/video is debunked, would it?

Why is it that as technology advanced, things got blurrier?

Why is it that as technology advanced, things got blurrier?

Because of all the hoaxers that make money with youtube crap.
If they wouldn´t make their hoaxes that blurry, everybody would need less than three seconds to debunk those "evidence videos" and they wouldn´t make a penny on youtube!

a reply to: bgerbger

The more detail in a photo/video, the more 'information' available in the image to prove it's fake.

Blur masks this 'information', hence this is why I think image quality is lacking despite the available (pricy and time investment heavy) technology.

That aside I also think image stabilization (lowering resolution), compression artifacts, ISO noise in low light conditions and optical zoom are the main issue.

a reply to: bgerbger

That first image was a model kit UFO, I had one when I was a kid...

image

The gulf breeze UFO was Hoaxed. It was a model too, found in the perps home by new tenants.



Very few true images in the public realm. We are censored.

a reply to: bgerbger

Because they're actually demons and are "interdimensional"

Dr. Jacques Vallee ~ The Control System
www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: zeroPointOneQ

Plus the credible new images are often detailed enough to be identified as man-made crafts/objects.

a reply to: bgerbger

2nd picture, LOLOLOLOL

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: bgerbger

Because they're actually demons and are "interdimensional"

Because the church promotes that BS to keep people loyal to Religious dogma.

a reply to: dan121212

I like this one even more, Third Phase have nothing on this guy.

a reply to: bgerbger

HAHA

a reply to: bgerbger

debunked here before www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: dan121212

Goodness me, Buy the Bots, I am more than aware of this.

Did you read the thread, or just look at the pictures?

Because most clear ufo pics are obvious fakes. If the pic just shows a blob more people will let their imaginations run away.
I mean ask yourself, why has ufo pic quality gotten worse as camera and video quality has gotten better?

edit :I should have read the comments before I posted. seems like everyone already knows this.

originally posted by: bgerbger
a reply to: dan121212

I like this one even more, Third Phase have nothing on this guy.

Forced perspective is fun.

a reply to: bgerbger

"Back when I was a youngster I was more than convinced by these alien spacecraft." if thats true i cant help you

a reply to: bgerbger

and asking a hoaxer to create a convincing image so you can believe again, please dont, we have enough fakes

a reply to: dan121212

That was when I was 10, more than 30 years ago.

If you don't get it, I certainly cannot help you.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

everyone has seen these pics and they have never been convincing

The white house 1952 siting remains for me the most convincing ufo.
jump to 3:40 to see the pics.

a reply to: bgerbger

saw these when i must of been 10 years old too, so, get what?