AST Moving Cylinder UFO on Live Newscast - OKLAHOMA

All this technical discussion and all I see is a moth or other insect fly past a bright light near the camera and across the screen at an angle, its not very big as it is so will appear to get small and out of sight (and illumination from the light) very fast..

Being its a digital CCTV camera it won't handle the object being near the camera and fast very well so will elongate it as an artifact because of the CCD.

Seriously ladies and gents, its an insect near the camera being lit up by a light..Its a UIO, and unidentified Insect Object...

Edit: its does not pass behind anything, it simply goes out of range of the light so appears to vanish....

originally posted by: markymint
I like where your eyes end up at the end of its trajectory. Hello mama!

Seriously though what's that anchors name please? If it's a true-FO then the "why" is far more important than the "what". Not that anyone here seems inclined to look into the "why" and only the "what". But still, it could, if a true-FO, for all we know be telling us, or more importantly, her, to get herself health checked. You can connect the dots on that one.

As for the "what", it reminds me of this...

I'd say it's similar to another video but I have never found it since so can't repost it, sadly. Cos it was a good one of something like this (well, 3 of these) passing over an airport in night vision.

Excellent he is the my local newsreader for Newcastle but I wonder if anyone found out what it was ?

a reply to: seattlerat


Except skyfish don't exist it's more likely a bird illuminted by those bright lights.

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: humanoidlord

I doubt it's a bird or a bug because of the light, at that altitude I don't think it wouldn't get enough light from the ground to appear that bright.

What altitiude ?

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: humanoidlord

Yes, it's pretty low, but the lights on the buildings and lamp posts point to the ground, not up, only reflected light goes up, so it's not much.

The camera viewpoint is above the lights and it's evident that a lot of light is reaching the cameras position directly so why not a bird flying above them.

a reply to: wmd_2008

I'm sorry. sir, but although I don't believe in skyfish, neither do I believe in birds flying in straight trajectories like that, nor insects.

And, although a lot of people claim to see evidence this is something close to the camera, what is the evidence for this?

Look! Up in the sky, Its a bird, its a plane, no its an oofo--

reflection off glass in front of the camera.

It doesn't look like a bird, moth, balloon, reflection or aeroplane.
It looks like an orb/flying saucer.

originally posted by: beetee
a reply to: wmd_2008

I'm sorry. sir, but although I don't believe in skyfish, neither do I believe in birds flying in straight trajectories like that, nor insects.

And, although a lot of people claim to see evidence this is something close to the camera, what is the evidence for this?

Armap has already shown it was not perfectly straight, what evidence do we have it's far away ?

Anytime a bright dot in a video at night or a dark one during the day is shown on here we get the, look it moved at incredible speed comments but if you don't know how far away or its size you cant make a claim.

The object appears to be lit by the lights which are not that far away so a insect very close to the camera or a bird further away are the most likely answers.

a reply to: wmd_2008

But it does not move like a bird, does it?
Nor does it move like an insect, in my experience.

So what are the grounds on which you determine it is either of those? Is it because " what else can it be" or do you base it on something?

BT

It's a bird.. probably seagull

a reply to: beetee

An eagle does not move like a seagull... a seagull does not move like a pigeon... a pigeon does not move like a sparrow... a sparrow does not move like a crow...
you get the idea..

In my opinion, neither a bird nor an insect. The trajectory is pretty level but does seem to drop slightly...and, has anybody noticed that as the light approaches the tower in the distance, it appears to change direction to the right and land. There is also a smudge of light behind it as it does so. Does this indicate a sudden change in speed and direction?

Simple, its a reflection off of the inside of the camera lens.

a reply to: 0racle

That is one fast seagull then. Or a pretty minuscule one, if you choose to describe the speed as a result of its closeness to the lens.

Doesn't look like the flight of any seagull I have ever seen. Maybe it's Jonathan Livingston ? :-)

Oh dear, the forums are suffering from the age old 'does not matter' problem, this manifests itself where a clique of forum regulars only read or accept posts from the known clique, sadly this happens a lot of the 17 years plus I have been on here...

It sort of defeats the object of a forum and the sharing of knowledge, doing the old "if XYZ says its that then it must be that because they are on here posting every day" simply takes the logic out and makes a mockery of so called critical thinking.

Sigh...Its sad that on so many of the forums that lots of people post good stuff in replies and yet because they are not 'knowns' people ignore their posts....

And before you think its about me, read my sig...I have no care for points, stars or notoriety, I just hate seeing others post good stuff and it get washed over, these same people will tire and go when we need as much fresh blood as we can get!

Not sure what's going on, but I cannot post a image form my library. There are frames showing artifacts just before the object passes the red light pylon and it lingers there for a few frames and dissipates. Then directly below the object is a red vertical line that appears. Anyone else see that?? I also got a shot of the very last frame of the object to the right of the lit up freeway sign at ground lvl just before it fades in to news crew. They edited in that video so why did they cut it off and then later on claimed viewers called in saying there was a UFO?? The news crew that edited in the video didn't notice that? I find that hard believe. Then these two guys show up trying to explain that it's a meteorite. Not buying it. It clearly slows down and makes a angled turn adjacent to the freeway. I have seen a lot of meteorites and they are hell of bright and fast streaks, green ones, blue ones, white ones. Once one lit up the entire neighborhood green, it was really eerie. This just doesn't strike me as a meteorite. Maybe somebody can get a google map and line up the two freeways signs along with the red light tower and check the angle cause that trajectory path it takes seem to slow down at ground level with the signs. It surely would have hit the ground long before that right?

Is the camera available for anyone to watch ? I'm just wondering if this light is some sort of light that's outside near the camera that gets reflected. What I'm saying it we have the one 8 second clip but does this light appear more often and that someone has just used the 8 second clip to gain some sort of attention by making it out to be a UFO

There's a 380p version mostly circulating, it's pretty horrible. It's got artefacts, damn right. It couldn't be much worse (well alright, it could be 240p...Nokia heyday era quality)

There is this 480p version, and the "tail" effect seems to be much less, though there does seem to be something in the final few frames. But at 480p it's very much still possibly just bleed from the illuminated "thing" it passes right at the end there.

www.youtube.com...

Hard to tell. The HD quality version (or anything above 480p) is clearly being suppressed. In fact, the whole lot seems be being politely shovelled away, from google search, youtube... Makes its way to a few commercial online news sites though.

YouTube being absolutely flooded with # by all the shill accounts as it ever does when there's something slightly legit on the table. This one is being actively buried.

Someone at the station needs to leak the HD playback... and it definitely exists in some capacity, even on someone's Tivo. HD would clear it up (or thicken the plot) considerably.

a reply to: ThePeaceMaker

That's sort of the same question that I am asking. How the in the hell could news crew not notice that when they was the ones that edited the video into the entire timeline?? They cut off the video of what happens at the end of the mysterious UFO video they claim they had no idea it was in the video. WTH?? That makes no sense.