Warren Agrees 2016 Democratic Primary Was Rigged For Clinton

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: IAMTAT

From the Squaw's own lips.

Hillary is getting the full blown toss under the bus treatment finally by the DNC, and the Media acts like they are just learning something, what a joke.

The Media was in full collusion with Team Hillary all the way to the last minute. All them 90%+ fake polls in her favor, using camera tricks to hide the empty auditoriums while she was at podiums, the rigged debates questions, it goes on and on how the Media were bought and paid for.

They need to learn a few more things,

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Now we can all agree that Hillary leaves a trail of slime where ever she goes and no one in the DNC is untainted by the stench of corruption, but I have to say that nothing will ever happen.

The establishment republicans are just as bad and probably knew most, if not all, of what was going on.

Hell, if us small unwashed peons can figure it out, then anyone can.

Yet they do nothing.

On the other hand, if the 'handwringing' Republicans get the idea that the perception is changing, especially from their greatest fear, the MSM, they may be forced to deal with it....if they think it won't hurt them in the polls....the cowards.

a reply to: IAMTAT

so now i guess we know that native americans also speak with a forked tongue.😈

a reply to: IAMTAT

There's no question Clinton pay for the win in South Carolina primary with cash. The pre-election polls and exist polls did not match by a lot!

a reply to: TinfoilTP

Looking back, it is amazing how deep the deception went during the primaries.

On and on and on as you said.

Adding to what you laid out, remember how they tried to cover it up at the convention?

From literally kicking Bernie supporters out and HIRING people to fill their seats to having "white noise" macines to drown out the protests to handing out counter chant pamphlets to counter the anti-Hillary chants to darkening the empty Bernie sections and on and on......

The whole thing was an illusion and the list of complicit actors is endless.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

The Media was in full collusion with Team Hillary all the way to the last minute. All them 90%+ fake polls in her favor, using camera tricks to hide the empty auditoriums while she was at podiums, the rigged debates questions, it goes on and on how the Media were bought and paid for.

I sat right here and watched that unfold exactly as you say.

Don't stop at the media, the military has continued on without a hitch, we are on the same warpath, breaking the deal with Iran, demonizing North Korea, and blaming Assad for WMD.

The corruption in Wall Street, the Lobbies, Banks, Healthcare, Immigration, Infrastructure, unchanged.

It matters not who presides in the Whitehouse, less than ever.

Fun Fact:
The deal with Hillary to rig the DNC was brokered by Marc Elias...the SAME lawyer who secretly financed the Fusion GPS 'Trump Dossier' for Hillary.

a reply to: IAMTAT

This is awesome. And to be fair, she never backed Hillary until she won the nomination and was the only thing standing between Trump and his dumpster fire of an administration. She would have strongly supported Sanders had he won the nomination.

originally posted by: Lab4Us
Her public under the bus throwing is the beginning of the rats deserting the sinking ship known as the DNC. If the old guard (Pelosi, Schumer, etc.) don’t get out of the way for the young guard (Booker, the California crazy lady, etc.), Dems won’t hold the majority for many, many, MANY years to come. Which would be a shame, because as an Independent I could see Booker as POTUS. How can you resist a man who rescues dogs from burning houses?

Booker is the new guard? Really? He seems cut out of the same exact mold.

originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: IAMTAT

This is awesome. And to be fair, she never backed Hillary until she won the nomination and was the only thing standing between Trump and his dumpster fire of an administration. She would have strongly supported Sanders had he won the nomination.

"...until she won the nomination"?
Clinton rigged it.
It's NOT a "win"...if you've cheated and unfairly made your win a foregone conclusion.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: IAMTAT

This is awesome. And to be fair, she never backed Hillary until she won the nomination and was the only thing standing between Trump and his dumpster fire of an administration. She would have strongly supported Sanders had he won the nomination.

"...until she won the nomination"?
Clinton rigged it.
It's NOT a "win"...if you've cheated and unfairly made your win a foregone conclusion.

Fully agreed. I'm just saying that it wasn't like Warren was in her corner from the beginning or anything. Her politics more closely align Sanders than Clinton and everybody was pretty disappointed at the time that she didn't thrown in for Bernie.

a reply to: Abysha

Would she have bobbed her head and waved her arms around more ferociously ?

originally posted by: Abysha

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: IAMTAT

This is awesome. And to be fair, she never backed Hillary until she won the nomination and was the only thing standing between Trump and his dumpster fire of an administration. She would have strongly supported Sanders had he won the nomination.

"...until she won the nomination"?
Clinton rigged it.
It's NOT a "win"...if you've cheated and unfairly made your win a foregone conclusion.

Fully agreed. I'm just saying that it wasn't like Warren was in her corner from the beginning or anything. Her politics more closely align Sanders than Clinton and everybody was pretty disappointed at the time that she didn't thrown in for Bernie.

....because she was on the short of potential VP's. She chose not to rock the boat.

originally posted by: Abysha

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: IAMTAT

This is awesome. And to be fair, she never backed Hillary until she won the nomination and was the only thing standing between Trump and his dumpster fire of an administration. She would have strongly supported Sanders had he won the nomination.

"...until she won the nomination"?
Clinton rigged it.
It's NOT a "win"...if you've cheated and unfairly made your win a foregone conclusion.

Fully agreed. I'm just saying that it wasn't like Warren was in her corner from the beginning or anything. Her politics more closely align Sanders than Clinton and everybody was pretty disappointed at the time that she didn't thrown in for Bernie.

Warren knew Sanders didn't stand a chance. Hillary owned the DNC before he even put his hat in the ring and if Warren didn't know this then her support is nothing either way because it proves how out of it she is and utterly useless as a politician to not know.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Woa, woa, woa!!!

This is simply the banter of a right wing conspiracy theorist who believes the lies of Putin's puppet Assange, am I right!!??

Welcome to the party Warren, you supported a corrupt politician and exposed your own failure as a politician.

Members of the DNC that want to save any kind of face have one way of doing so IMHO, run third party.

The DNC is as much of a s*** show as the RNC, it is priceless observing the moral "righteousness" they have conditioned into the liberal DNC crowd.

It is time to wake up!

Knowing what the DNC knows...and now admits to knowing...WHY does it still consider Clinton's nomination VALID?

Technically, morally..and rightfully, Hillary Clinton should be unanimously disavowed as the legitimate 2016 Democrat nominee by the Democrat Party.

Edit:
But, then, Hillary is NEVER held accountable or punished by the Left.

After all...she probably didn't "intend" to cheat.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Knowing what the DNC knows...and now admits to knowing...WHY does it still consider Clinton's nomination VALID?

Technically, morally..and rightfully, Hillary Clinton should be unanimously disavowed as the legitimate 2016 Democrat nominee by the Democrat Party.

Edit:
But, then, Hillary is NEVER held accountable or punished by the Left.

After all...she probably didn't "intend" to cheat.

I have been at a loss as to how anyone could consider the vile creature known as Hilldog a defendable human being.

I refuse to refer to it as anything but IT, a monster, psychopath, vicious, conniving liar, that celebrates death (Gaddafi) and enjoys deceiving all it can.

It's laughter really does sum up my point...

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Knowing what the DNC knows...and now admits to knowing...WHY does it still consider Clinton's nomination VALID?

Technically, morally..and rightfully, Hillary Clinton should be unanimously disavowed as the legitimate 2016 Democrat nominee by the Democrat Party.

Edit:
But, then, Hillary is NEVER held accountable or punished by the Left.

After all...she probably didn't "intend" to cheat.

Because Hillary is STILL their leader. They look up to her STILL.

The lot of them are just as corrupt as Hillary

They all knew the campaign was rigged and NONE of them would be singing tonight if Hillary had beaten Trump.

They cant be trusted, not even Bernie who is the MOST shameful because he knew about this and STILL got in line behind Hillary like a good little socialist boy

I’ll ask again ... how were the Primaries and Caucuses rigged? Clinton and Sanders were on the ballot in every State.

Democrats voted; Sanders lost, even before superdelegates were counted.

The State governments administer the Primaries and regulate the Caucuses.

WHERE WAS THIS RIGGING DONE?

originally posted by: Gryphon66
I’ll ask again ... how were the Primaries and Caucuses rigged? Clinton and Sanders were on the ballot in every State.

Democrats voted; Sanders lost, even before superdelegates were counted.

The State governments administer the Primaries and regulate the Caucuses.

WHERE WAS THIS RIGGING DONE?

debbie wasserman schultz...is that you???

Wow, that makes so much more sense now!!