Hillary Clinton Caught In A Lie Now Admits Funding Russian Sourced Dossier

originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: burntheships

I am not a Republican nor a Democrat. I cannot possibly understand, after the issues that have come out the last few days, how anyone can still be enrolled as a Dem. By supporting these clowns you are knowingly abetting criminally corrupt liars. THEY STOLE YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE BY FIXING THE PRIMARY. We all know it goes on but to see to the level these skunks went to take away our rights is preposterous. If Trump is really serious about draining the swamp people have to start going to Federal prison.

They do this because of misplaced and bloated self pride. To admit their thinking has been flawed, and that they have been willingly deceived by the very people they support, would mean having to face that reality, and denial is so much easier and requires no remorse or emotional effort.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Thanks for the video!

It seems like Hiilary might be embracing her evil villain role.
She will do anything say anything short of perjury to stay
in the limelight.

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: burntheships

The DNC

lol...

And this is those associated with the DNC leaving...

a reply to: Chickensalad

Follow the breadcrumbs to the FISA warrant.
That is the crux of the story.


Was this phony research used to get a FISA warrant
to spy on Trump?

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Xcathdra

Thanks for the video!

It seems like Hiilary might be embracing her evil villain role.
She will do anything say anything short of perjury to stay
in the limelight.

I wouldn't count on the perjury part.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Great post.

Yes, I think this may be the clearest it's ever been to show how connected all of these sides are, and we the people are only given the illusion of choice.

I hope that thread gets pulled further.

a reply to: Xcathdra

She was a lawyer, she knows the blurred lines well.
I think she has perjured herself many times...

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Chickensalad

Follow the breadcrumbs to the FISA warrant.
That is the crux of the story.


Was this phony research used to get a FISA warrant
to spy on Trump?

This is what I have been saying all along.

As shady as Don Jr or the dems going to russia to get dirt on each other is, I don't think it's a crime for either.

But if the dossier was used for a fisa warrant without a thorough investigation that it was legit, it is a scandal of epic proportions.

originally posted by: Chickensalad

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Chickensalad
I need some clarification.

From what I've seen, one side says the GOP initially bank-rolled the dossier, but that the DNC payed the final dividends.

So, wouldn't BOTH parties be in trouble, ifn this was an actual crime?

The republicans say they hired them for oppo research during the republican primaries and all info was obtained from domestic sources. Clintons campaign picked up where the Republicans left off and they started the dossier.

So,wouldn't both parties involved in the financing of the dossier be in the same boat?

The "conservative" publication didn't fund the "dossier".

That publication wasn't a RNC representative.

a reply to: Grambler

If this happened, which by all accounts so far it appears
Obama used this situation to politicize The FBI it is
an abuse of power like never before.

Read your thread, s&f to you.

a reply to: theantediluvian

You do not understand the definition of collusion. You continue to parrot the MSM narrative. I've never seen a poster in such a state of blind denial as you are. Place aside your hatred of Trump and use the critical thinking skills I know you have.

The irony of your chosen avatar pic is the polar opposite of how you actually write.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Wrong. You've misused the word "collusion" multiple times.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

Right now on CNN, Elizabeth Warren is Throwing Hillary under the bus. She is saying the entire process was rigged...

Oh wow
Warren is pretty close to what one could call a party "leader" at this time.

If this heats up any further the whole DNC will throw Hillary under the bus. Case in point, Donna Brazille is already greasing the bus underside for Hillary.

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Chickensalad

Follow the breadcrumbs to the FISA warrant.
That is the crux of the story.


Was this phony research used to get a FISA warrant
to spy on Trump?

This is what I have been saying all along.

As shady as Don Jr or the dems going to russia to get dirt on each other is, I don't think it's a crime for either.

But if the dossier was used for a fisa warrant without a thorough investigation that it was legit, it is a scandal of epic proportions.

And interestingly enough the perfect get out of jail card for Clinton and other Democrats. If the dossier was misrepresented to get the warrants than anything discovered by those warrants would be inadmissible n court. That includes any evidence linked back to Clinton and Democrats.

If accurate its pretty ingenious.

Remember Clinton supposedly said if Trump wins we all hang. I wonder if this was Clinton / Democrats plan B if they lost. Intentionally sabotage a national security investigation into Trump knowing it will ensnare Democrats. Use the media to attack trump, knowing it wont go anywhere, all the while laughing because you got away with it.

a reply to: burntheships
Hum would she lie?

Let's look at 1995

No Intention To Question First Lady By STEPHEN LABATON Published: July 26, 1995 FACEBOOK TWITTER GOOGLE+ EMAIL SHARE PRINT REPRINTS WASHINGTON, July 25—
The chairman of the Senate committee investigating the Whitewater affair today ruled out calling Hillary Rodham Clinton as a witness unless strong evidence emerged of her involvement in the mishandling of papers from the office of a White House aide who committed suicide two years ago.
The chairman, Senator Alfonse M. D'Amato, said in response to a request by Senator Lauch Faircloth, Republican of North Carolina, that Mrs. Clinton testify that she would not be called "unless there is clear and convincing facts and reason" to do so. "It would have to be very, very, very strong evidence and facts that have been established very, very clearly," said Mr. D'Amato, Republican of New York. "Otherwise there will be no appearance before this committee of the First Lady."

www.nytimes.com...

a reply to: SeaWorthy
Not to mention Hillary got booted off the Watergate Commission and the Dem head for that refused to give her a recommendation.

a reply to: thepixelpusher

Or the fact she was indicted during that time yet was never prosecuted.

ATS - Push to unseal the draft Whitewater indictment against Hillary Clinton gets court date

she could use the money of Ukrainian fascists, the Kiev junta number 1 in the list of foreign sponsors www.wsj.com...

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
Could the DNC actually make themselves look worse?!

If I was Cory Booker I'd abandon ship right away

Dude booker is one of them..

originally posted by: TobyFlenderson
a reply to: burntheships

I am not a Republican nor a Democrat. I cannot possibly understand, after the issues that have come out the last few days, how anyone can still be enrolled as a Dem. By supporting these clowns you are knowingly abetting criminally corrupt liars. THEY STOLE YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE BY FIXING THE PRIMARY. We all know it goes on but to see to the level these skunks went to take away our rights is preposterous. If Trump is really serious about draining the swamp people have to start going to Federal prison.

These issues since the primaries and election, as well as aftermath, definitely moved me off the fence from being a disgusted Democrat (because of Obama supporting regime change proxy wars in Libya and Syria) to now identifying as a liberal independent.