It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Abysha
The situation you describe is a personal upclose and personal interaction.
Uber as a corp has dipped it's toe into curtailing free speech by punishing a person who they disagree with. This is indeed very dangerous ground they are standing on.
Not everyone can recognize this.
Oh my god, no they are not. How can you not see that? If she had said that to one driver, she could be banned. Instead, she said that to all of the drivers.
Free speech doesn't mean that businesses have to cater to jerks who publicly disparage them! Are you guys seriously not understanding this?
Shopping around for a baker until you find one that politely declines because of their personal faith, then suing them, is pretty jerky.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Abysha
The person just wanted a cab ride.
Now that person is banned because of thought.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Abysha
The person just wanted a cab ride.
Now that person is banned because of thought.
So you are against Uber's decision? Besides she was waiting for a non-Muslim driver and got late because of it. That is like waiting for a non-Black driver.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Abysha
The person just wanted a cab ride.
Now that person is banned because of thought.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Abysha
The person just wanted a cab ride.
Now that person is banned because of thought.
So you are against Uber's decision? Besides she was waiting for a non-Muslim driver and got late because of it. That is like waiting for a non-Black driver.
If you are for this, then you must be for punishing people who think differently.
Basically discriminating against people who don't think like you.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Abysha
Go right ahead and punish unpopular thought.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Abysha
The person just wanted a cab ride.
Now that person is banned because of thought.
So you are against Uber's decision? Besides she was waiting for a non-Muslim driver and got late because of it. That is like waiting for a non-Black driver.
If you are for this, then you must be for punishing people who think differently.
Basically discriminating against people who don't think like you.
I can't recall but for some reason I thought you support businesses' right to refuse service to anyone based on religious beliefs?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Abysha
The person just wanted a cab ride.
Now that person is banned because of thought.
So you are against Uber's decision? Besides she was waiting for a non-Muslim driver and got late because of it. That is like waiting for a non-Black driver.
If you are for this, then you must be for punishing people who think differently.
Basically discriminating against people who don't think like you.
I can't recall but for some reason I thought you support businesses' right to refuse service to anyone based on religious beliefs?
Yep, and I was told how terrible and wrong I was.
By the same people who now think it's wonderful.
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Abysha
Go right ahead and punish unpopular thought.
So if it's unpopular, it should be an exception to the rule? I don't understand your logic here. If I insult a business with a popular opinion, you'd support their banning me but, if I insult a business with an unpopular opinion, you wouldn't support the business banning me?
I'm just trying to understand you.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Abysha
Go right ahead and punish unpopular thought.
So if it's unpopular, it should be an exception to the rule? I don't understand your logic here. If I insult a business with a popular opinion, you'd support their banning me but, if I insult a business with an unpopular opinion, you wouldn't support the business banning me?
I'm just trying to understand you.
Public Accommodation.
That was beaten into me by everyone over the cake business. I was told that businesses HAVE to serve the public by the same people who are saying that businesses have the right to refuse service.
Yep, and I was told how terrible and wrong I was.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: DBCowboy
Yep, and I was told how terrible and wrong I was.
So you agree with the right of business owners to refuse service based on thoughts they find "unpopular"?
Well, I guess you were right in your first post.
We will enjoy the hypocrisy in this thread.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: DBCowboy
Yep, and I was told how terrible and wrong I was.
So you agree with the right of business owners to refuse service based on thoughts they find "unpopular"?
Well, I guess you were right in your first post.
We will enjoy the hypocrisy in this thread.
I drink to the hypocrisy.