It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: loam
The left seems hellbent on repeating their mistake from the last election. Keep believing 2020 looks good for you. So far you have no message beyond anti-trump and resist. You have no leader, but the one who just lost and seems determined to remain relevant.
Yup. The polls look good for the left. Just like last time.
Seeing as how Trump won on being "not Obama" or "not Hillary" that seems like a pretty viable platform to run on.
I don't think with only 28% of the vote it is considered a popular vote...lol
With the presidential election results now certified in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., Hillary Clinton won a total of 65,844,610 votes ― 48.2 percent ― compared with Trump’s 62,979,636 votes ― 46.1 percent ― according to David Wasserman of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report. Other candidates took 7,804,213 ballots, or about 5.7 percent of the popular vote.
www.huffingtonpost.com...
originally posted by: windword
With the presidential election results now certified in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., Hillary Clinton won a total of 65,844,610 votes ― 48.2 percent ― compared with Trump’s 62,979,636 votes ― 46.1 percent ― according to David Wasserman of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report. Other candidates took 7,804,213 ballots, or about 5.7 percent of the popular vote.
www.huffingtonpost.com...
originally posted by: windword
You're right. Non votes mean nothing to me. Talk about skew!
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Xtrozero
There is no such thing as a national popular vote.
originally posted by: burnsE
a reply to: Xtrozero
Democrats is the party of the poor. There are more poor than rich. Of course Democrats win the popular vote every single time.