It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Then there's the angle where increasingly half the kind of stuff people in this site are into posting, having the place littlered with old threads loaded with dead youtube player embeds.
Time for people to start breaking these kinds of molds otherwise we're all a bunch of chumps in this nation.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Jefferton
Yeah. because brand loyalty to the 'Robberbarrons of the 21st Century' isn't cultish in the slightest.
originally posted by: Montana
I am not sure why anyone would use videos as evidence of anything other than visual phenomenon. Why should I sit and watch a video of someone talking about a paper, memo, news story or what ever.
Give me a link to the paper. Point me to the news story, I am more than capable of reading it myself and forming my own opinion, thanks.
Videos are a crutch that are used to lead the easily convinced down a dead end side street. I can find my own way.
That being said, if video evidence is required, any reputable source should be allowed. However, I don't see the difference between a link to a video and embedding it into a post.
originally posted by: skywatcher44
Truth.
You should be able to put whichever video link in and it throws up the video if allowed and decent..