It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A federal jury awarded a Texas man more than $1.3 million in a civil lawsuit against deputies who claimed he assaulted them in January 2015.
But Lawrence Faulkenberry’s home surveillance video camera proved that was a lie. Had it not been for his home surveillance camera, Faulkenberry might still be in prison.
Not only did Faulkenberry not assault deputies, the video shows Caldwell County Sergeant Dustin M. Yost using a judo-type leg sweep on Faulkenberry, causing him to fall down, even though he appeared to be fully cooperating. Then all three deputies can be seen piling on top of him with one deputy punching him in the eye and another pushing him down with his knee.
The video also revealed at no point in the video did Faulkenberry assault deputy Michael Taylor and deputy Houseton, which they claimed as justification for their use of force. Faulkenberry was arrested for felony assault on a public servant, resisting arrest and aggravated assault with a firearm.
Faulkenberry’s lawsuit claimed deputies handcuffed his right hand “so hard he still bears the scars.”
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: infolurker
Good.
Now can we stop kneeling?
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: infolurker
Good.
Now can we stop kneeling?
Yea right, this would be fuel for that. He's white, had hands up and didn't get shot.
Hands up don't shoot only works for white people would be what is said.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: infolurker
Good.
Now can we stop kneeling?
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: infolurker
Great outcome1
originally posted by: infolurker
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: infolurker
Great outcome1
I bet this stuff would be reduced greatly if the officers lost their pensions when crap like this happened!
originally posted by: KansasGirl
a reply to: infolurker
I don't think that asking if they have a warrant is "disrespect of authority." Did you mean to say "the perceived disrespect of authority in the eyes of the corrupt power-drunk cops?"
originally posted by: infolurker
originally posted by: KansasGirl
a reply to: infolurker
I don't think that asking if they have a warrant is "disrespect of authority." Did you mean to say "the perceived disrespect of authority in the eyes of the corrupt power-drunk cops?"
LOL,
Yes. I was being sarcastic.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: infolurker
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: infolurker
Great outcome1
I bet this stuff would be reduced greatly if the officers lost their pensions when crap like this happened!
YES, YES, YES. GREAT idea!