It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MissSmartypants
Large pieces of Skylab landed in Australia so again...look up.
originally posted by: Silcone Synapse
a reply to: MissSmartypants
I am no expert MSP,but I think most of the space station would break into smaller bits and burn up during atmospheric re entry.
I think other satellites and space stuff has done this in the past.
It may make a nice light show for a lucky few,but I wouldn't worry too much in those smarty pants of yours.
originally posted by: TiggersTheMan
a reply to: Phage
You win. Skylab is a special memory, only because I was a child and thought it was going to kill us all. Or me, at the very least.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Silcone Synapse
Probably would cool down by the time it reached the ground. But there could be hydrazine or something even worse around. Best not be handling stuff like that.
Responding to what he saw as widespread media misreporting of the basic physics of the controversy, he performed specific research and published the results on the Internet. His conclusion: claims that the tank would be destroyed were “written in apparent ignorance of well-established heat transfer relations for spacecraft reentry. Simple estimates of the total heat transfer to the tank upon reentry, available in any number of aerospace textbooks, show that the heating of the tank would probably not have been sufficient to melt the hydrazine entirely, much less vaporize or ignite it.”
Nor would the tank disintegrate from other forces. Johnson added that the deceleration forces—perhaps 8 to 10 Gs—were well within the structural strength of the tank to endure.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: MissSmartypants
I could think of a dozen places here I WISH it would land!
originally posted by: Indrasweb
a reply to: MissSmartypants
Haha.. you might be right...
......what if, for example, a large piece of the flaming debris smashed into the Pentagon or into MI5 HQ or something? Would it be considered some kind of negligence?
Yeah...always taste something before you touch it I always say.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Silcone Synapse
Probably would cool down by the time it reached the ground. But there could be hydrazine or something even worse around. Best not be handling stuff like that.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MissSmartypants
Remember...sometime within the next 6 months includes now. So look up.
As the time approaches it will become possible to refine the time and location. So, instead of looking up, look here:
www.aerospace.org...
I wanna see one!
When parts of Skylab landed in Australia the United States was given a $400 fine for littering...so there's that.
originally posted by: Indrasweb
a reply to: MissSmartypants
Haha.. you might be right...
Joking aside though; could China be held responsible if their failing technology was responsible for a serious incident... what if, for example, a large piece of the flaming debris smashed into the Pentagon or into MI5 HQ or something? Would it be considered some kind of negligence? Could they be blamed? I'm really not sure... my feeling is that surely there would have to be some kind of a response beyond "ahh well... # happens"