It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Epilepsy doesn't tend to kill people, as far as I know.
People with epilepsy are at an increased risk of death. This increase is between 1.6 and 4.1 fold greater than that of the general population and is often related to: the underlying cause of the seizures, status epilepticus, suicide, trauma, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Source
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
Epilepsy doesn't tend to kill people, as far as I know. At her age? Very suspicious.
I don't know what to think, on this one, but it's odd.
Except the article doesn't claim she died from epilepsy..so
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Increased risk, perhaps, but she contradicted official reports, and dies within days of this event? Seems like a big coincidence, and I don't believe in those. Knew someone some years back who was epileptic, and quite elderly, too.
This is suspicious, with everything else odd about the case.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Increased risk, perhaps, but she contradicted official reports, and dies within days of this event? Seems like a big coincidence, and I don't believe in those. Knew someone some years back who was epileptic, and quite elderly, too.
This is suspicious, with everything else odd about the case.
Juts adding that it can lead to complications and death. Not saying that was the cause but it is a distinct possibility.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Seems a very slim possibility, and the timing, you have to admit, is very suspect.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Seems a very slim possibility, and the timing, you have to admit, is very suspect.
Actually, I wouldn't. Not unless the autopsy produced some unusual findings.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
If this was a hit of some sort, to cover up something, do you really think they couldn't easily control autopsy results? Anyone who could plan, and conceal said plans, an event like this could manage that as well.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
If this was a hit of some sort, to cover up something, do you really think they couldn't easily control autopsy results? Anyone who could plan, and conceal said plans, an event like this could manage that as well.
Too many moving parts, even Kennedy's autopsy photos came out.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
But not likely to see them for some average citizen, so how would we know?
The California Public Records Act (PRA), Government Code Sections 6250 to 6270, requires the Santa Clara County Medical Examiner-Coroner’s Office to make public records available for inspection by the public and to provide copies upon request. Source
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
But not likely to see them for some average citizen, so how would we know?
The California Public Records Act (PRA), Government Code Sections 6250 to 6270, requires the Santa Clara County Medical Examiner-Coroner’s Office to make public records available for inspection by the public and to provide copies upon request. Source
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
Well, that's something, at any rate. Doesn't prove it would be accurate, but something. Still, we now have a couple who survived, who were killed in a bizarre car crash, with a massive fire. Coincidence?