Why Hillary Lost....According to a Liberal, Minority Female

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

NY Giant fascist/communist?

a reply to: Gryphon66


Guilty as friggin charged.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: CB328
That and most Americans are stupid as dirt.

Most Americans voted for Hillary.

She got the highest number of votes from the dead ones

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Gryphon66


Guilty as friggin charged.

LOL ... you are a continual self-contradiction, AM.

But we luv ya!

originally posted by: stormcell
She got the highest number of votes from the brain dead ones

Fixed.

a reply to: soberbacchus

How about if the team that lost the big game cheated to get into that competition originally by sabotaging the prior game just to be there? If they had not done that, then perhaps that other team would have had the opportunity to win in the "big game"?

Hmmm.... But, I guess that does not factor into your calculus.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
LOL ... you are a continual self-contradiction, AM.

But we luv ya!

Thanks for the complements.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: soberbacchus

Division was the aim. Straw boogie men for the US political consumer courtesy of Putin.

Lots of people in play here... Old George Soros is supporting all of this but for different reasons. I don't know if the Russians are just fighting the NWO or if they really want to see America collapse. It is not like they will fill the void...If we go, so do they under China or Middle East.

Putin certainly believes he can fill the gap. He has been moving on the middle east (Syria) and cozying up to OPEC this past year and Iran is under his wing. He would already have taken back the former soviet republics if not for the USA. As it stands we have seen him invade Georgia and Ukraine in recent history.

It is one thing to have two fighters in the ring and argue about what is fair play, but letting someone billionaire asshat with a bet on the fight jump over the ropes with a bat and wallop one fighter is not OK. Not to the fighters and not to the rest of us with vested interests in the outcome.

It aint OK for Russia to interfere with US elections. Never. Nope.

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: soberbacchus

How about if the team that lost the big game cheated to get into that competition originally by sabotaging the prior game just to be there?

That was not cheating. No laws regulate the DNC or RNC's selection process. It would be like screaming that it was unfair someone got a promotion at your company.

It was by the books even if it was arguably unfair or sneaky. The RNC did and does equally crappy things. Both private orgs.

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: soberbacchus

How about if the team that lost the big game cheated to get into that competition originally by sabotaging the prior game just to be there?

That was not cheating. No laws regulate the DNC or RNC's selection process. It would be like screaming that it was unfair someone got a promotion at your company.

It was by the books even if it was arguably unfair or sneaky. The RNC did and does equally crappy things. Both private orgs.

Just as I thought....a 4 year old viewpoint. "They did it too....whaaa".

The point is that the team you hold close to your heart lost. It lost based upon the rules in place. So far there has been none, zero, zilch, nada, proven evidence that would hold up in court regarding the "cheating" you claim. That means, by default, there wasn't any....right?

Heck, the team I rooted for didn't win either. But I am not here whining about that am I? No, I've accepted the loss and have moved on to being an American and trying to make the best out of the choice by the Electoral College based upon the rules of the game.

Guess what. You don't get to decide what is cheating or legal. Neither do I.

So, what is the point of holding on to the old popular vote argument?
The reality is there is none.

Again, escape form the distortion field before it consumes you in it's hatred.

a reply to: soberbacchus

The corrupt nitwits in the corrupt to the core Dem party can do whatever they want, as you say. Private org, etc etc...

Money talks, though. This shows how normal people - as in NOT die hard Hillary fans - react to the corruption and the lies from nitwits like that awful Debbie Wasserman Schultz. (Didn't help much to replace her with poor Mr. Bird # Perez either.) The Dem club house is burning to the ground and the nitwits have only themselves to blame.

"The DNC raised just $3.8 million in July, compared to the $10.2 million raised by the RNC in the same month. While the GOP has no debt, the DNC added slightly to its debt in July, which now sits at $3.4 million.

The Democrats haven't raised that little money in a July since 2007, when the party raised $3.4 million."

More here:
thehill.com...

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: CB328
That and most Americans are stupid as dirt.

Most Americans voted for Hillary.

Most? No.

More? Yes, slightly.

Hillary did not achieve a majority. The majority of voters voted against her.

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

I think you're missing the fact that I was joking about his inane comment.

I'm never serious! Unless we're talking about beer.

a reply to: Gryphon66

You took from it what you wanted. She still didn't win and all the whining in the world want make it so.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: UKTruth
No.

*sigh*

Joke---------------------------------------------------------------------->
(your head)

OOPS...and here was me thinking that it was Americans who didn't get sarcasm :|

She lost because she's unlikable and didn't excite the liberal base. It was clear, clear evidence and even testimony in the DNC lawsuit, that she rigged the primary so that she couldn't lose. None of it was illegal, but very unethical and shady. It did cost Debbie Wasserman Shultz her position and ultimately Hillary, the election.

Those on the left that were supporting Sanders could see it clearly, and either voted for Jill Stein or as was mostly the case, didn't vote at all.

That's it period. James comey, Russia, Bernie, non of that mattered. It was all Hillary. And It almost looks like the Democrats are setting themselves up to fail again unless they can get a good candidate or one comes out of left field. Obama kind of came out of nowhere to win. I don't know who's in the wing. They would have a really good shot at Trump if he chooses to run again.

As last election, it's the Democrats ball to lose.

Biggest problem with Hillary Clinton is that she is really bad at controlling microexpressions in her face and body language, and it makes people think she's untrustworthy. She's not a naturally warm person, and when she tries to be it comes off as a lie.

originally posted by: UKTruth

OOPS...and here was me thinking that it was Americans who didn't get sarcasm :|

It's cool my friend.

a reply to: Blue Shift

Hate to break it to you but it's a lot more than just microexpressions that makes people think HRC is not trustworthy. How about the fact that she is a pathological, shameless liar? Just watch her lie, lie, lie about Bernie Sanders.

a reply to: CB328

HA!

HaHa!!

She lost long before Comey.

But hey, if it makes you feel better to think she wouldn't have, that's you delusion of choice.