It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: saint4God
Do you understand the concept of "slander" and "libel" laws?
Being that Planned Parenthood is 'non-profit', the organization doesn't really have anything to lose since they don't have customers.
Otherwise, we all get called names and experience character assassination without recourse because of free speech.
originally posted by: windword
They have patients.
So, it's okay to slander non-profit organization's employees?
originally posted by: windword
Everyone has recourse to defamation, through the very courts you want to limit.
I thought the idea of the proceeding was to determine if there is slander in the first place, which is "false spoken statement damaging to a person's reputation."
Secondarily, I don't know where the first amendment ends and slander begins since the Constitution does not address the issue of slander or an end to the First Amendment.
If the courts are as bias as the point being established here
I'm pretty sure this is old news, and the maker of the videos has been exposed for editing and falsifying his credentials and the nature of the conversations. But, believe what you want to believe about Planned Parenthood, the law is the law. Abortion is legal and donation of fetal tissue is legal