Skunk Works Promo Video

Damn your going to have to get me to start up CAD again arent you :-P
I agree is baaaaadly airbrushed out.Even in "Paint" you can select the original colour to use as a brush..
I do love the shape though.Does look extremely like the artist renditions.

And no one has caught the major issue with the picture?

I see one person has.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

144 feet long
20 feet from hangar to shadow edge

a reply to: Zaphod58

Darksidius's post about the positioning being weird?

a reply to: Bfirez

You don't put aircraft in a hangar sideways. They take up too much room, and they're much harder to get in and out.

a reply to: Zaphod58

The age of the image?

a reply to: Zaphod58

You think thats a b2?

a reply to: BASSPLYR

Could be, could be something else. It's almost certainly not an "SR-72" sitting sideways, hallway out the door.

a reply to: Zaphod58

So a flying wing of some sort siting askew with a more obtuse nose angle than a b2? But roughly the same size.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

Probably.

Raider is smaller than B2..Can think of another platform roughly that size but angle is different at front.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

Nah, I don’t think it’s a shadow of any sort. It’s just how they used the blur tool, or how the software generated the blur for that specific area.

But no shadow of any plane...

I was only pointing out that whatever was poking out, or could potentially have been seen some of in that particular image, because some ass forgot to close the doors, they had the whole door opening intentionally blurred out. Whereas in similar perspective overhead shots prior, have shown the doors closed, without any blurring.


*edit*


see the attached image of the same hangar in 1997, and note the large fascia, above the hangar door... IF there was an aircraft poking out in the 2017 blurred sat photo, it certainly wouldn’t be seen that close to the building, in that shallow (relatively-speaking here) of an angle overhead shot, there wouldn’t be any shadow of said aircraft, in the vicinity of the darker blur of our 2017 sat blurred door opening.

Either way, I think they blurred whatever they thought was being shown, and then some, which meant blurring some of the building fascia above the hangar door, which we see in the 2017 sat blurred door opening.

a reply to: Blackfinger

If it's even an accurate shadow.

i agree.I can see some Graphical Artist giggling with glee in the mayhem he/shes creating..

what am i not seeing here

a reply to: penroc3

originally posted by: nelloh62
a reply to: Woody510

Hehe, here you go mate, there are 4 images in the link

imgur.com...

a reply to: Blackfinger

Oh god yes. I wouldn't put it past them.

a reply to: Zaphod58

yikes, that is a huge leap.

wishful thinking at best, maybe it was a coup by the map makes bucking the system and leaving the ral shape in there

why would it be sideways? instead of nose out seems easier to move

a reply to: penroc3

That was my point. You don't put aircraft in the hangar sideways. You can't run engines, you lose a lot of space for other aircraft, and you have to tow it out.

a reply to: Zaphod58

its like parking your car sideways in the garage, pointless and stuck lol. ill just leave this video here