Irrefutable evidence that 9/11 was a government false flag

William Cooper predicts 9/11 - go to 1:25 marker


Here former Navy intelligence officer explicitly states on a radio broadcast (date: June 28, 2001) that there would be a major incoming attack that would be blamed on Osama Bin Laden.

Starting at the 1:25 marker

...and I'm telling you be prepared for a major attack... but it won't be Osama Bin Laden, it will be those behind the New World Order who once again wants to take the guns and freedom away from the American people because we're the only ones left in the world who can oppose the destruction of freedom in the world and the implementation of a one world totalitarian socialist government...that is the goal. And what is ever going to happen that they're going to blame on Osama Bin laden don't you even believe it! - William Cooper,
broadcasted June 28, 2001. 3 months before his death.

Fox News reports collapse of second building BEFORE it happens


BBC news reports collapse of WTC 7 before it actually happens


In this video you can hear the controlled demolitions at ground zero as well as reports from first responders.



Video also shows how Larry Silverstein filed an insurance claim on the buildings months before the "attack" as well as not having attended meetings during the 9/11 event.

Insurance dispute

The insurance policies for World Trade Center buildings 1 WTC, 2 WTC, 4 WTC and 5 WTC had a collective face amount of $3.55 billion. Following the September 11, 2001, attacks, Silverstein sought to collect double the face amount (~$7.1 billion) on the basis that the two separate airplane strikes into two separate buildings constituted two occurrences within the meaning of the policies. The insurance companies took the opposite view, and the matter went to court. Based on differences in the definition of "occurrence" (the insurance policy term governing the amount of insurance) and uncertainties over which definition of "occurrence" applied, the court split the insurers into two groups for jury trials on the question of which definition of "occurrence" applied and whether the insurance contracts were subject to the "one occurrence" interpretation or the "two occurrence" interpretation.

The first trial resulted in a verdict on April 29, 2004, that 10 of the insurers in this group were subject to the "one occurrence" interpretation, so their liability was limited to the face value of those policies, and 3 insurers were added to the second trial group.[22][23] The jury was unable to reach a verdict on one insurer, Swiss Reinsurance, at that time, but did so several days later on May 3, 2004, finding that this company was also subject to the "one occurrence" interpretation.[24] Silverstein appealed the Swiss Re decision, but lost that appeal on October 19, 2006.[25] The second trial resulted in a verdict on December 6, 2004, that 9 insurers were subject to the "two occurrences" interpretation and, therefore, liable for a maximum of double the face value of those particular policies ($2.2 billion).[26] The total potential payout, therefore, was capped at $4.577 billion for buildings 1, 2, 4, and 5.[27] An appraisal followed to determine the value of the insured loss.

en.wikipedia.org...

I will post more about the predictive programming in my next post.

a reply to: usos90

november? not june? he was killed in november, and then it would be after 9/11 anyway.

did you even bother to read your own post?

a reply to: usos90

"Irrefutable evidence"

Ah the words of the new guy. Welcome to ATS. The 9-11 forum is filled with evidence, but I am not sure any of it is "Irrefutable evidence", if it was, it wouldn't be a conspiracy "theory", it would be fact.

I look forward to more "absolute proof" claims. They do make everyone smile just a bit.

originally posted by: jedi_hamster
a reply to: usos90

november? not june? he was killed in november, and then it would be after 9/11 anyway.

did you even bother to read your own post?

You're right, meant to type June.

Typos.

NM, you fixed it.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: usos90

"Irrefutable evidence"

Ah the words of the new guy. Welcome to ATS. The 9-11 forum is filled with evidence, but I am not sure any of it is "Irrefutable evidence", if it was, it wouldn't be a conspiracy "theory", it would be fact.

I look forward to more "absolute proof" claims. They do make everyone smile just a bit.

It's not funny. Most down-to-Earth people knows it's an inside job and it's a serious insult.

You know how many people that were killed for the last decade or so over this BS? Civilians, service members, bystanders etc?

Yeah, we only invaded the Middle East for:
(1) Their oil
(2) Heroin
(3) Arms trade
(4) Metal and other resources

Also both Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein have been killed since at least 2011. Why are we still sending troops over to Afghanistan?

a reply to: usos90

Also both Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein have been killed since at least 2011. Why are we still sending troops over to Afghanistan?

Pride and $$$.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: usos90

$$$ and $$$.

Fixed that for you.

I was lucky I guess getting to see BIll Cooper lecture 2 times in NJ. Ready my first printing of BaPH about 20-25 years ago. Agreed with some of what he said and he , by his own admission , was wrong on other things.

William Cooper never predicted 9/11. That is a falsehood that conspiracy types like to go with to fulfill their narratives.
What did he predict then?

1. That there would be a nebulous attack based on avail intel that most BBS/forums/whatever were talking about in the civilian world so you could only imagine what those in the DOD world knew

2. While not a prediction he was also sure that that JFK was shot with a blowfish gun based off video ..the first 2 hour lecture I saw of him live this was basically all he talked about..He was friendly, approachable , spoke to people afterwards and was sure that it was a blowfish gun.

By the second time I saw him live the production company that played him and purposely modified the JFK video for him admitted to it and he was a much different person.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: usos90

"Irrefutable evidence"

Ah the words of the new guy. Welcome to ATS. The 9-11 forum is filled with evidence, but I am not sure any of it is "Irrefutable evidence", if it was, it wouldn't be a conspiracy "theory", it would be fact.

I look forward to more "absolute proof" claims. They do make everyone smile just a bit.

It basically is a fact that the government continually denies. I mean seriously. Paper passports survived? LOL.

a reply to: usos90

I can't post images since I'm at a library but I will link them.

Predictive programming - Simpsons 9/11 subliminal message
i.ytimg.com...

Predictive programming - Terminator 2 9/11 subliminal message
i.pinimg.com...

(*Note: The "caution 9-11" entrance banner isn't there anymore. I'm still trying to see if any real life residents in the area where the movie was recorded can actually measure the passage to see if it's actually 9 feet and 11 inches.)

Predictive programming - Johnny Bravo 9/11 subliminal message
s3.scoopwhoop.com...

Subliminal messages in Hollywood films (I understand some is supposition and coincidences)

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: usos90

Also both Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein have been killed since at least 2011. Why are we still sending troops over to Afghanistan?

Pride and $$$.

Obviously but it's an insult.

Seriously it pisses me off.

originally posted by: SRPrime

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: usos90

"Irrefutable evidence"

Ah the words of the new guy. Welcome to ATS. The 9-11 forum is filled with evidence, but I am not sure any of it is "Irrefutable evidence", if it was, it wouldn't be a conspiracy "theory", it would be fact.

I look forward to more "absolute proof" claims. They do make everyone smile just a bit.

It basically is a fact that the government continually denies. I mean seriously. Paper passports survived? LOL.

Yeah, planting evidence after the matter is just as a big as a slap in the face as the event itself.

a reply to: usos90

That couldnt be anything at all to do with 911 being the number for emergencies or crisis in North America effective the late 60s or early 70s.

Nah..wouldnt make sense.

originally posted by: opethPA
I was lucky I guess getting to see BIll Cooper lecture 2 times in NJ. Ready my first printing of BaPH about 20-25 years ago. Agreed with some of what he said and he , by his own admission , was wrong on other things.

William Cooper never predicted 9/11. That is a falsehood that conspiracy types like to go with to fulfill their narratives.
What did he predict then?

1. That there would be a nebulous attack based on avail intel that most BBS/forums/whatever were talking about in the civilian world so you could only imagine what those in the DOD world knew

2. While not a prediction he was also sure that that JFK was shot with a blowfish gun based off video ..the first 2 hour lecture I saw of him live this was basically all he talked about..He was friendly, approachable , spoke to people afterwards and was sure that it was a blowfish gun.

By the second time I saw him live the production company that played him and purposely modified the JFK video for him admitted to it and he was a much different person.

Nobody has a monopoly on truth. Everyone has some truth in their beliefs and some things they're wrong about.

You can't throw the baby out with the bath water. Also William Cooper was an intelligence officer. I trust his critique.

Still, all the other footage, subliminal messages, and circumstantial evidence is obvious. Stuff like this makes you have a hard time trusting the government.

Also that television is PURE EVIL.

Trust me on this one, that TV is EVIL!!!

If this was a conspiracy to create a "one world totalitarian socialist government", where is it? I mean, here we are in 2017 and still we don't have this New World One World Government we've been promised.

'Well... it was stopped'. Was it? When? By whom? What was the steps and the outcome? Or did Bush say "oh nevermind. it's not going to work". Bush Jr or Sr... Take your pic. Many said Bush Sr was going to herald this thing in. Then they said that Bush Jr would be the one... here we are and no NWO. I don't see that we're any closer than we have ever been to one.

I put NWO in the same box as Nibiru and the Rapture. They keep saying it's coming but it never does.

originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: usos90

That couldnt be anything at all to do with 911 being the number for emergencies or crisis in North America effective the late 60s or early 70s.

Nah..wouldnt make sense.

True, 9-11 is a phone numeber to police and the ambulance but what about the films that explcitily stated how they would blame the WTC attacks on Muslims to invade their country for oil?

Or the "caution 9 - 11" banner in Terminator 2? Modern day residents state that bypass warning isn't there anymore nor has anyone confirmed if the passage actually measures 9 foot 11 inches.

originally posted by: StallionDuck
If this was a conspiracy to create a "one world totalitarian socialist government", where is it? I mean, here we are in 2017 and still we don't have this New World One World Government we've been promised.

'Well... it was stopped'. Was it? When? By whom? What was the steps and the outcome? Or did Bush say "oh nevermind. it's not going to work". Bush Jr or Sr... Take your pic. Many said Bush Sr was going to herald this thing in. Then they said that Bush Jr would be the one... here we are and no NWO. I don't see that we're any closer than we have ever been to one.

I put NWO in the same box as Nibiru and the Rapture. They keep saying it's coming but it never does.

The idea of an NWO isn't actually bad. It's just the implementation of it that goes wrong.

Civilization starts out in packs, packs turn into tribes, tribes turn into villages, villages into towns, towns into cities, cities into states, states into countries, eventually all the countries become united.

A unified planetary system is actually sound from an evolutionary perspective but most won't agree with it due to multiculturalism and national schisms. People are too attached to their cultures.

originally posted by: usos90

originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: usos90

That couldnt be anything at all to do with 911 being the number for emergencies or crisis in North America effective the late 60s or early 70s.

Nah..wouldnt make sense.

True, 9-11 is a phone numeber to police and the ambulance but what about the films that explcitily stated how they would blame the WTC attacks on Muslims to invade their country for oil?

Or the "caution 9 - 11" banner in Terminator 2? Modern day residents state that bypass warning isn't there anymore nor has anyone confirmed if the passage actually measures 9 foot 11 inches.

Or if Caution 9-11 was just a play on 911 being the number for assistance needed.
Or if the overpass is 9 feet 11 inches.
Or if it was some predictive tale of Sept 11.

None of that is conclusive anything and depending on how much or how little tinfoil you wear in life it could mean multiple things.

a reply to: usos90

Sure, it isn't bad... IF we have a democracy type government. But if it turns to socialism or worse... much worse... Then not just one country is at stake. The whole world suffers at once. No where to run, no where to escape to. Even if it starts out as a good thing, it doesn't mean it will stay that way. It can turn bad with the wrong person at the helm. Even factions within the NWO could turn away and those people slaughtered just to keep everyone under the iron fist.

I really don't see a NWO being good. It 'sounds' good from a democratic perspective but you can bet it wont be, at least it wont stay that way.