It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
These booms being reported all over the Northland may be some sort of geodynamic process taking place. The booms may be the result of crustal movement and the resulting explosive fracturing. Some people who have reported the booms even reported seeing flashes of light. Basically, these booms may be the result of microquakes and the flashes of light could be the mysterious Earthquake Lights.
Earlier this week there were three large Coronal Mass Ejections from the sun, but it was the third ejection that made the news. It was an X9 class flare, the largest in 12 years. Over the course of Thursday and especially Friday night, the Northern Lights could be seen as far south as Arkansas. I believe it was this solar storm that bombarded the Earth the past few days that may have caused the booms here in the Northland and the major 8.4 earthquake that struck Mexico two nights ago, the largest quake Mexico has had in over 100 years.
originally posted by: Rezlooper
Earlier this week there were three large Coronal Mass Ejections from the sun, but it was the third ejection that made the news. It was an X9 class flare, the largest in 12 years. Over the course of Thursday and especially Friday night, the Northern Lights could be seen as far south as Arkansas. I believe it was this solar storm that bombarded the Earth the past few days that may have caused the booms here in the Northland and the major 8.4 earthquake that struck Mexico two nights ago, the largest quake Mexico has had in over 100 years.
originally posted by: Antipathy17
a reply to: Rezlooper
Nope, You'd hear it EVERYWHERE.
originally posted by: Rezlooper
originally posted by: Antipathy17
a reply to: Rezlooper
Nope, You'd hear it EVERYWHERE.
And why is that?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: smurfy
Would that correlation include strong flares with no "associated" strong earthquakes? And strong earthquakes with no "associated" flare?
And is it the flare, or a CME which encounters Earth which is the critical factor?
Same holds for the "booms."
Many questions. Too many, it would seem.
Scientists assembled historical records of the Sun’s interaction with Earth, looking at sunspots, solar wind, and magnetic storms. They then compared these with historical records of earthquake occurrence. They found no significant pattern between solar activity and more or larger earthquakes. There is no demonstrated way to use space data to predict future earthquakes.
[15] From retrospective analysis of historical data, we cannot confidently resolve a statistically significant relationship between solar-terrestrial variables and earthquake occurrence. Therefore, we cannot confidently reject the null hypothesis of no solar-terrestrial triggering of earthquakes. This does not mean, of course, that there is no such role—we just cannot detect its presence in historical data. What it does mean is that we have no testable correlation that can be used to objectively predict future earthquakes. In contrast to the work reported here, some advocates of hypotheses in which solar-terrestrial interaction does actually trigger earthquakes have reported the identification of different types of correlations of possible relevance. Before such claims can be regarded as valid, advocates need to demonstrate the statistical significance of their correlations in objectively chosen historical data sets. To guard against inspection and selection biases, advocates of solar-terrestrial triggering of earthquakes also need to demonstrate the persistence and statistical significance of their claimed correlations against future data. This has not been done. And until it is, the hypothesis that solar-terrestrial interaction can trigger earthquakes must be regarded with significant skepticism.
originally posted by: Z32Driver
a reply to: Phage
Hello Phage.
There is actually some evidence to indicate a corelation between solar activity and planetary positions to earthquakes on earth. It's laid out nicely here if you care to take a gander. These connections are not well established but it look to me like there is something there beyond mere coincidence.
Earthquake Prediction Center
-Driver
originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: Rezlooper
Have you looked at what a published study on the correlation between solar activity and earthquakes concluded?
Does Solar Activity Cause Earthquakes?
Scientists assembled historical records of the Sun’s interaction with Earth, looking at sunspots, solar wind, and magnetic storms. They then compared these with historical records of earthquake occurrence. They found no significant pattern between solar activity and more or larger earthquakes. There is no demonstrated way to use space data to predict future earthquakes.
The Study
[15] From retrospective analysis of historical data, we cannot confidently resolve a statistically significant relationship between solar-terrestrial variables and earthquake occurrence. Therefore, we cannot confidently reject the null hypothesis of no solar-terrestrial triggering of earthquakes. This does not mean, of course, that there is no such role—we just cannot detect its presence in historical data. What it does mean is that we have no testable correlation that can be used to objectively predict future earthquakes. In contrast to the work reported here, some advocates of hypotheses in which solar-terrestrial interaction does actually trigger earthquakes have reported the identification of different types of correlations of possible relevance. Before such claims can be regarded as valid, advocates need to demonstrate the statistical significance of their correlations in objectively chosen historical data sets. To guard against inspection and selection biases, advocates of solar-terrestrial triggering of earthquakes also need to demonstrate the persistence and statistical significance of their claimed correlations against future data. This has not been done. And until it is, the hypothesis that solar-terrestrial interaction can trigger earthquakes must be regarded with significant skepticism.
It looks like with available historical data, there is no evidence to support that idea. Sounds like a might be, but it's extremely unlikely sort of thing.