It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ADSE255
a reply to: ancienthistorian
Question. Was it Sitchen who translated the Sumerian Tablets himself, or Scholars. Are they made up names or accurate documented accounts? Not everyone trusts Sitchen, is why I ask.
Thanks
originally posted by: ancienthistorian
a reply to: ADSE255
Yes Harte is correct Sitchen used available translations but that doesn't mean his translations were wrong
originally posted by: ancienthistorian
Regarding the potential DNA markers for the bloodline I presented it appears to me that the mitochondrial DNA marker of Haplogroup T seems to be the most likely candidates for this bloodline, seeing that Haplogroup T:
1. Originated in Mesopotamia.
2. Have predominantly been found among sea-fearing civilizations like the Minoans.
3. Is found 40% among the Udmurts (a population of red heads)
4. Has also been found among the elongated skulls of Peru.
Notice on the map above how the highest frequencies of haplogroup T peaks along the Phoenician trade routes like Syria (Phoenicia) , Crete , Italy , Tunisia (carthage) and Spain.
The marker seems to be equally distributed across the middle east & Europe ranging around 8-10%.
However this is all hypothetical but still very fun to speculate
originally posted by: Hanslune
originally posted by: mandmvintagepens
originally posted by: Rapha
It will be interesting to see how these elitists react when they demand worship from the peasants again.
There will be a huge rebellion against the elite. People have just had enough of their dictatorship where the peasant is a surf and the elite have everything.
Absolutely! While I am skeptical of Anunnaki origins of European royalty or "Reptilians" (sic), there are definitely close ties between European royalty and the Rothschild/Soros/Rockefeller clans that seem to manipulate the world's governments. There will be a revolt, and soon.
Ah, and how will this revolt be different from the ones in 1848, 1789 or 1989? Why has royalty been replaced if they were allied with RSR?
originally posted by: ancienthistorian
(zoom/save for better view)
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: ancienthistorian
(zoom/save for better view)
I have a question...
What, exactly are you trying to say by connecting these very different videos and a graphic? It's not at all clear and historically the timelines aren't terribly similar.
Can you please post a link to any actual study showing the presence MtDna haplogroup T in any ancient sample from the americas?, because the only reference I could find was one refering to the presence of taurine MtDna Hg T in andean south america, and it REFERS TO CATTLE.
Any link actually showing the data, because that link from the other thread is absolute BS, graphics lifted from other sources do not consitute a study, and no where on that site is there any sort actual scientific data presented.
Haplogroup T has also been found among ancient Egyptian mummies excavated at the Abusir el-Meleq archaeological site in Middle Egypt, which date from the Pre-Ptolemaic/late New Kingdom (T1, T2), Ptolemaic (T1, T2), and Roman (undifferentiated T, T1) periods.[8]
originally posted by: ronthealien
This all fascinating and interesting.
However, all religions were built on a particular message and intent. Most stole ideas and theology from older works.
As for the annunuki....I think that they were nomads who were more sophisticated in weapons and goods.
They would come to a region and the indigenous people regarded them as unworldly and godlike.once that mindset caught hold it bloomed into a oral history and legend. I'm sure the story was edited over time because memory fails and the blanks have to be filled.
all these stories and histories to come from a lost source I admit. However I'm sure most came from normal and unusual events
originally posted by: ancienthistorian
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: ancienthistorian
(zoom/save for better view)
I have a question...
What, exactly are you trying to say by connecting these very different videos and a graphic? It's not at all clear and historically the timelines aren't terribly similar.
It's just to illustrate the connection between the Hebrews, Phoenicians , Greeks and how they were all influenced by the Sumerians.
Most of these cultures were very familiar with each other aswell. The Sumerians wrote about Amorite/canaanite gods like Amuru &
The epic of Gilgamesh also mentioned that the Anunnaki gods lived in the land of Cedar forests In Lebanon, Syria which back then was still part of Canaan ,
Half of all the Greek heroes & gods (according to Homer & Hesiod) originated from Phoenicia (Canaan) ,
The Greek god Dionysus was said to be born between Phoenicia & the Nile river of Egypt which may possibly be Israel the land of the Hebrews.
So despite the timelines to assume that all these cultures had nothing in common is simply not true.
We know that they had things in common and some were that they were derived from older cultures and civilizations. There are good examples of culture borrowing and culture mixing... but none of them involve the seven or ten (or more, depending on the date of the ancient material you read) Annunaki deities.
In general it's the most popular deities that were assimilated and kit-bashed together... the ones who had big temples in many cities. Not the ones with no temples or who were only the patron of a single city.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
There are no aliens. We are singular and we are alone.
There has never been one story proven true. Not a single solitary one.
There is zero proof. I don't understand the obsession beyond the eighth grade.
Are we reading different versions of Homer and Hesiod? The birthplaces of all the Greek gods are in Greece... and the only mention of Phoenicians (other than visiting the land) is a mention of an unnamed Phoenecian as a scoundrel and a cheat
He was born on the Greek island of Icaria.
The Homeric hymn to Dionysus places it "far from Phoenicia, near to the Egyptian stream". - Wikipedia
So despite the timelines to assume that all these cultures had nothing in common is simply not true.
We know that they had things in common and some were that they were derived from older cultures and civilizations. There are good examples of culture borrowing and culture mixing... but none of them involve the seven or ten (or more, depending on the date of the ancient material you read) Annunaki deities.
In general it's the most popular deities that were assimilated and kit-bashed together... the ones who had big temples in many cities. Not the ones with no temples or who were only the patron of a single c
originally posted by: ancienthistorian
"Half of all the Greek heroes & gods (according to Homer & Hesiod) originated from Phoenicia (Canaan)"
Are we reading different versions of Homer and Hesiod? The birthplaces of all the Greek gods are in Greece... and the only mention of Phoenicians (other than visiting the land) is a mention of an unnamed Phoenecian as a scoundrel and a cheat
Here's a list of early Greek deities who lived and were born in Phoenicia (Canaan)
- Agenor
- Cadmus
- Cepheus, King of Aethiopia
- Cilix
- Europa
From them almost half of the Greek heroes and gods (including Dionysus , Perseus , Minos and Hercules ect.) are descendants from these Phoenician characters.