It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerminalVelocity
This is the History forum. Not the I'm Going To Make Crap Up forum.
Citation demonstrating direct proof that the US used chemical and biological weapons?
It sure is not in the link you provided.
This is the History forum. Not the I'm Going To Make Crap Up forum.
I worry as to the level of revisionism and fallacy in the OP.
The real threat to North Korea is their development of nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them; this being done while the population starves and China and Russia profit.
The Korean War started when the North attempted to invades the South. The South was supported by the UN with USA initially in situ. The North was supported by the Chinese and Russians. Note the war was initiated by North Korea (communist) supported by China and Russia.
originally posted by: Involutionist
Do you deny this version of history: North Korea Has Never Attacked the US, but the US Has Killed an Estimated 4-10 Million Koreans ?
originally posted by: Involutionist
It is ironic you stated that since you followed it up with your own revisionism and fallacy:
It is a true comment, but cuts both ways. While North Korea has not attacked the US, the North Koreans did initiate an invasion of the South that was under the protection of the US.
Why? Because I am an American and North Korea presently has declared that they intend to strike this country with a nuclear weapon.
I don't give a damn what America has or has not done to or with them, self preservation dictates that I'd rather see them taken out than see the chance of my own experiencing death and destruction from NorK WMDs.
...it's one country with nuclear weapons directly threatening a country with the full capacity and ability to grease spot the entirety of the other if we so choose.
The Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea is ramping up its nuclear deterrence, and this is causing consternation and wild proclamations from western officials and corporate media. What is particularly galling for the United States side is that North Korea appears to have achieved the capability of hitting the US mainland with ICBMs.
However, is the US not capable of hitting North Korea from wherever? So why does a rival created by the US cause panicked rhetoric upon achievement of an ICBM capacity?
Jack Rice, a former CIA agent, referred to North Korea as a “threat.” Why? Who is threatening who? North Korea has pledged no-first-use of nukes. The US has not. So who is the actual threat?
If North Korea has achieved and maintains an effective nuclear deterrence, then a US attack is only imaginable in a nightmare Bizarro World. An attack on a nuclear-armed North Korea would be mad. The US would not be unscathed in such an attack. Major population centers such as Seoul, Busan, and Tokyo (all where US troops are stationed) and perhaps the US mainland would be hit. Of course, North Korea would be obliterated. Even if continental US were not hit by nukes, the radiation from nuclear fallout and a potential nuclear winter will affect the entire planet
Consequently, all the talk in the media of a war is irrational conjecture or bluffing
Simply put, maybe it's time for the USA to remind the North Koreans of what it feels like to be an ant under a boot...
Actually, President Trump also said that the U.S. "is not innocent". But, like most other Americans, Trump is more concerned about the threat that North Korea is posing TODAY, more so than what we (the USA) may have done to North Korea in the past. He does not want current citizens of the United States to pay for damages that deceased USA leaders inflicted upon North Korea, decades ago.
In 1945 the world declared Korea a free country again.
In 1946, the US Government drew a line and split Korea in twain, taking most of the food production land for the South.
This pee'd off the remainder of Korea (what is now the North) and they attacked to try and throw out the decadent invaders. ( That would be the US) They failed.
The US are still in illegal occupation of the South. If they left, the North and South could unite under the care of China. This does not suit the West's Military Industrial Complex.
Truth is truth.
2. Your figure of "estimated killed" has been plucked out from the air. - The direct toll from the Korean War (started by the North) was c. 2.5 million civilians killed and wounded, with the killed being around a million. That was both sides. -
Combatants on both sides amounted to c. 400K to 800K killed. Getting actual statistics is difficult as the North and Chinese have never revealed the body count, however as the Chinese deployed over a million troops and their tactics were quite blunt, we can speculate that lots of Chinese died.
originally posted by: pheonix358
In 1945 the world declared Korea a free country again.
In 1946, the US Government drew a line and split Korea in twain, taking most of the food production land for the South
Grow up. Its a nasty world out there and it isn't unreasonable at all to think in such terms.
originally posted by: Raxoxane
a reply to: Involutionist
Ya i saw that comment about the ant under the boot and i could just shake my head..