Irreducible complexity and Evolution

Further evidence into the existence of preprogrammed information is the interaction of dna and each of your body's organs... Now although the full genome is present in all organs it only reads and follows the specific instructions for itself...
The same is true for all forms of life...
From the smallest bits and pieces to the largest also holds true...
That is intelligent design and irreducable complexity...

How did molecular hardware write it's own software?
It didn't... Thats as retarded as saying lifeless material became the first organism...

Now let's look at the fossil record the crap they say proves evolution...
What fossil record? We are supposed to have all these predecessors yet we don't have their bones...
But we have the frauds that the fossil record supposedly produced to portray the missing species...
I believe it was the piltdown man who was a contrived model from a single tooth...
That tooth ended up being a pig's tooth...
Well what about Neanderthal man? Yeah what about him? That does not fit evolution either because they were superior to modern man...
Neanderthal man supports quite the opposite of what evolution portrays...
There are no transitional forms apparent but there are fraudulent claims...
And what about the Cambrian explosion?
Why do we see species go extinct but do not witness the creation of new species?
There is no way to quantify evolution...

a reply to: 5StarOracle

If evolution is real why hasn't any species overcome decay and death?
There is no progression being made there...
I'll answer why...
Because it's all encoded in pre programming...
That is irreducable complexity...

a reply to: dragonridr

So sperm were once non functional?
How did things pro create?
Shut up...
Nice videos...

There is zero proof of evolution it's all faith based what a funny religion it is...

originally posted by: 5StarOracle
Further evidence into the existence of preprogrammed information is the interaction of dna and each of your body's organs... Now although the full genome is present in all organs it only reads and follows the specific instructions for itself...
The same is true for all forms of life...
From the smallest bits and pieces to the largest also holds true...
That is intelligent design and irreducable complexity...

Why is that "intelligent design"?

Your argument is incomplete.

originally posted by: 5StarOracle
How did molecular hardware write it's own software?
It didn't... Thats as retarded as saying lifeless material became the first organism...

You are drawing a comparison which just does not fit. DNA, RNA, what is the hardware, what is the software?

This argument is incomplete, too. Because "Thats as retarded as saying lifeless material became the first organism" is not comprehendable.

a reply to: ManFromEurope

Because the information didn't design or write itself intelligence was needed to pre program it it's not random and is impossible for it to happen by chance...
The argument is not incomplete but your thought process is...

a reply to: ManFromEurope

I was talking about molecular flagellar motors...
You are just assuming you understand what I said instead of actually understanding it...
So I guess you are mistaken or just wrong...

originally posted by: 5StarOracle
Now let's look at the fossil record the crap they say proves evolution...
What fossil record? We are supposed to have all these predecessors yet we don't have their bones...

What bones do you need? There are millions of fossils.

But we have the frauds that the fossil record supposedly produced to portray the missing species...
I believe it was the piltdown man who was a contrived model from a single tooth...
That tooth ended up being a pig's tooth...

Science is a place where good arguments are replaced with better arguments. Sometimes explorers get a little over-excited. Remember that the "piltdown man" was discovered 1913 and refuted 1953. That is about 6 generations of science ago.

Well what about Neanderthal man? Yeah what about him? That does not fit evolution either because they were superior to modern man...

How was the Neanderthal man superior? By being stronger? By having a larger brain? Or do you have any examples of what he DID that was superior to anything homo sapiens did?

Neanderthal man supports quite the opposite of what evolution portrays...

Not really.

There are no transitional forms apparent but there are fraudulent claims...
And what about the Cambrian explosion?

Besides it was 500.000.000 years ago and we found a fascinating number of different species appearing in only some ten millions of years? Still a long timespan.

Why do we see species go extinct but do not witness the creation of new species?

What kind of example would you accept? Darwin's finches? Or are they bad, because Darwin wrote about them? Poor birds..

There is no way to quantify evolution...

There sure is no way to quantify anything anti-evolutionistic...

originally posted by: 5StarOracle
If evolution is real why hasn't any species overcome decay and death?
There is no progression being made there...
I'll answer why...
Because it's all encoded in pre programming...
That is irreducable complexity...

Algae, virae, human cancer cells have figured their way around decay and death. It is more difficult for bigger species, it seems. It has nothing to do with "irreducable complexity", just things like telomeres which can't be refreshed, etc.

originally posted by: 5StarOracle
There is zero proof of evolution it's all faith based what a funny religion it is...

There is a ton more proof to that than to anything else. You do know about Mendel and his experiments on peas? Or why children have a predeterminable chance of getting the eye-color of one of their parents?

And that there is a chance that blond hair might disappear about the year 2100? Thats all evolution in progress. Nothing intelligent around there.

originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: ManFromEurope

Because the information didn't design or write itself intelligence was needed to pre program it it's not random and is impossible for it to happen by chance...
The argument is not incomplete but your thought process is...

The information is a result of "try a new mutation and then die early or breed a lot of children". Thats evolution.

And you do not need to resolve to ad hominem, thanks.

a reply to: ManFromEurope

All cells die even stem cells

a reply to: 5StarOracle

The better the "hardware" in an organism works the better are the chances to breed a lot of children and give it to them, too.

The difference between hard- and software at size-levels of flagella and dna is irrelevant.

a reply to: ManFromEurope

Irrelevant how?
You have addressed nothing I stated...
But you are right about size not mattering because they follow the directions laid out for them all the same...

a reply to: ManFromEurope

And you do not need to resolve to ad hominem, thanks.

Sure he does... they all do

thats basically all they have...

Ignore.. restate whats already been resolved... insult, repeat

nothing new here

originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: ManFromEurope

All cells die even stem cells

Look up HeLa-cells.

Oh, you mean a SINGLE cell? What is a single cell which just divided itself into two cells? Did the old one die? Or does it still exists? Because thats what cancer-cells are doing. They can live forever (in a sustainable environment). Look up Schwann-cells, too.